collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: .45 or .50  (Read 7872 times)

Offline lamar_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 237
  • Location: Prescott, WA
.45 or .50
« on: May 14, 2009, 01:55:34 PM »
hey guys i have a winchester x150. it came with a .45 barrel and a .50. im comptemplating muzzleloading this year and wondered if any of you guys perfer a .45 caliber over the .50. I know the .50 is much more common. im thinking this is probably for a reason.
I tumbled him..

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 51012
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2009, 01:58:51 PM »
you have to use a .50 cal for elk by law.

45 is ok for deer, but it seems most still use a .50...maybe to eliminate the need for multiple guns.
 :dunno:


not true...i apologize
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 51012
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2009, 02:01:54 PM »
did they change the law?
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50686
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2009, 02:26:29 PM »
I chose .50  why...bigger IS better.

Offline lamar_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 237
  • Location: Prescott, WA
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2009, 06:13:37 PM »
yea i was planning on going with a 50 but just wondered what u guys thought
I tumbled him..

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2009, 08:02:10 PM »
50 forsure good luck

Offline lamar_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 237
  • Location: Prescott, WA
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2009, 08:28:04 PM »
50 forsure good luck

yea thanks rasbo. im not for sure if im doing muzzle yet. i talked to a buddy today and he asked me if i would be interested in packing back in the wenahas with mules and horses to deer hunt this year so i might have to do modern. i really wish i could do both!
I tumbled him..

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2009, 08:30:34 PM »
50 forsure good luck

yea thanks rasbo. im not for sure if im doing muzzle yet. i talked to a buddy today and he asked me if i would be interested in packing back in the wenahas with mules and horses to deer hunt this year so i might have to do modern. i really wish i could do both!
that would be a blast,I would go for it,go muzzy later

Offline lamar_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 237
  • Location: Prescott, WA
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2009, 09:52:34 PM »
50 forsure good luck

yea thanks rasbo. im not for sure if im doing muzzle yet. i talked to a buddy today and he asked me if i would be interested in packing back in the wenahas with mules and horses to deer hunt this year so i might have to do modern. i really wish i could do both!
that would be a blast,I would go for it,go muzzy later


yep i just bought my modern tag. im commited. thanks for the input anyways guys.
I tumbled him..

Offline hornhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 408
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #9 on: May 17, 2009, 08:16:04 AM »
The Big .54 for me  :)

Offline Pat/Rick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 363
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2009, 09:56:38 AM »
.54, hell yes its a sidelock. 8)

Offline Pathfinder101

  • The Chosen YAR
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 12262
  • Location: Southeast WA
  • Semper Primus
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2009, 10:09:02 AM »
I vote for .50.  Frankly though, I don't know much about the .45
All I do know is that when I was invited to muzzleoader elk camp for the first time, the guys told me that I had better show up with "no less than a .50 cal".
I own a .50 and a .54
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.  That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

Offline shoot-em-dead

  • non-yar
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2533
  • Location: yacolt
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #12 on: May 17, 2009, 10:13:27 AM »
I have a 50 and have killed one deer with it. Dropped in its tracks. I also have a 58 that shoots a 600 grain bullet  :yike: but the origional rear sight were never mounted and the one I put on is too low to sight the gun in.
This closet is taken- go find your own

Offline Smoke Pole

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 11
  • Location: Carnation
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #13 on: May 18, 2009, 09:18:40 AM »
I shot a bear with one of my 50s using a 50 cal. slug, she went down in a heap. I shot another bear with the same rifle using a 45 cal. sabot and he also went on the wall. I didn't notice a difference in the wound channel, and neither did they. My advice is to take both barrels to the range and see which one shoots best. Accuracy trumps bullet size any day.  Dry Powder :twocents:

Offline Pat/Rick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 363
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #14 on: May 19, 2009, 09:11:43 AM »
 :twocents: Larger is better because the wound channel/area will not be as large as it is with modern rifle/ammunition, less hydrostatic shock. You will still get bloodshot, but it will not be as much.The wound will be more of a ugly puncture.Whatever you decide,shot placement is still the decision maker.Have fun.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Bucket List Elk shed help wanted by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 05:48:32 AM]


Discretion !!! by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 05:43:22 AM]


Multi season draw odds by Mfowl
[Today at 03:27:12 AM]


Breaking news: Lorna Smith and WWF sue WDFW Director and Deputy Director by EnglishSetter
[Today at 01:40:23 AM]


Youth turkey season 2026 by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 11:23:14 PM]


2026 Sportsmen for Conservation Fund Banquet Hosted by SCI Northwest Chapter by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 10:45:45 PM]


.45-70 Loads and Twist Rate by jrebel
[Yesterday at 08:43:40 PM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:39:36 PM]


Your biggest spike elk by Brute
[Yesterday at 08:04:49 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by fishngamereaper
[Yesterday at 08:02:37 PM]


Razor Clams by Sitka_Blacktail
[Yesterday at 04:55:52 PM]


12th Annual - 2026 YOUTH TURKEY HUNT CONTEST (enter by Mar 15) by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 10:30:39 AM]


Cancellation Alaskan Bear Hunt by Dan-o
[April 03, 2026, 11:33:49 PM]


Chasing the kids by MADMAX
[April 03, 2026, 07:38:39 PM]


MA10 Blackmouth anyone? by CP
[April 03, 2026, 07:16:06 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by Mfowl
[April 03, 2026, 06:31:00 PM]


Questions regarding WDFW Commissioner use of taxpayer money by Jake Dogfish
[April 03, 2026, 06:29:24 PM]


Big game season proposals by Ghost Hunter
[April 03, 2026, 04:40:21 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal