collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??  (Read 9118 times)

Offline Jake Dogfish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2017
  • Posts: 3817
  • Location: Des Moines
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #45 on: June 08, 2022, 11:12:40 PM »
IMHO you shouldn't have to have a license to fish for invasive species...

Like bass and walleye?

You could say that even though they're not considered "invasive", but yeah them too, honestly.
I'd catch them by the dozens in the mid Columbia all the time so they're plentiful.
If WDFW wants to promote salmon recovery then i see no reason for them to put fishing for non-native species, that do in fact prey on salmon smolt, behind a paywall.
If your fishing with a pole you should have a license and provide it to a gamey.  Illegal immigrants should no be able to say they are fishing for invasive species and tell the officers to buzz off.
The only issue with the new rules would be bowhunters for carp as previously stated.   
Environmentalist Fundamentalist

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25038
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #46 on: June 08, 2022, 11:30:58 PM »
IMHO you shouldn't have to have a license to fish for invasive species...

Like bass and walleye?

You could say that even though they're not considered "invasive", but yeah them too, honestly.
I'd catch them by the dozens in the mid Columbia all the time so they're plentiful.
If WDFW wants to promote salmon recovery then i see no reason for them to put fishing for non-native species, that do in fact prey on salmon smolt, behind a paywall.
If your fishing with a pole you should have a license and provide it to a gamey.  Illegal immigrants should no be able to say they are fishing for invasive species and tell the officers to buzz off.
The only issue with the new rules would be bowhunters for carp as previously stated.

I personally think this is the main reason forth rule change.  I dont know but id bet this is an enforcement issue
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #47 on: June 09, 2022, 08:51:22 AM »
I don't really have a dog in the fight but I wouldn't mind them being added to a regular license without additional charge. It would mean more people getting licenses and paying into the WDFW.
  It looks like they want to remove the "exceptions" for smelt, carp and crayfish.  There was a big brush up over this in SW Washington years ago when they wanted to require a license for smelt.  Politicians got involved and screamed.  Now, with so many out-of-area abusers of the single day smelt season, I'm for making people get a fishing license--most people have one already.  Crayfish I'd say no.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12955
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #48 on: June 09, 2022, 08:54:12 AM »
I agree, fishing for any fish, yes.  Crayfish, no.  Are they going to go ticket all the kids at lakes and streams picking them up all summer even if they don't keep them?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #49 on: June 09, 2022, 09:03:55 AM »
I agree, fishing for any fish, yes.  Crayfish, no.  Are they going to go ticket all the kids at lakes and streams picking them up all summer even if they don't keep them?
Kids don't need fishing licenses

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #50 on: June 09, 2022, 09:07:45 AM »
I agree, fishing for any fish, yes.  Crayfish, no.  Are they going to go ticket all the kids at lakes and streams picking them up all summer even if they don't keep them?
Kids don't need fishing licenses

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  But at a certain age they do.  And then they have to prove their age.  Leave crawdads--the absolute key to a happy, healthy rural childhood experience, alone!  It's probably illegal for kids to "play" with them anyway on some technical grounds.

Offline Bullkllr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 4922
  • Location: Graham
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #51 on: June 09, 2022, 09:08:17 AM »
I'd support including them under the standard license. You need a license for all other forage fish and crustaceans that I'm aware of. The exceptions for smelt and crawdads seems pointless and must certainly create enforcement issues. I'd throw rod/reel angling for carp in there too.
A Man's Gotta Eat

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #52 on: June 09, 2022, 09:17:34 AM »
I'd support including them under the standard license. You need a license for all other forage fish and crustaceans that I'm aware of. The exceptions for smelt and crawdads seems pointless and must certainly create enforcement issues. I'd throw rod/reel angling for carp in there too.
That's what the proposal is. This is not creating a special license.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


Offline duckmen1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 2553
  • Location: outdoors
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #53 on: June 09, 2022, 09:22:37 AM »
I'd support including them under the standard license. You need a license for all other forage fish and crustaceans that I'm aware of. The exceptions for smelt and crawdads seems pointless and must certainly create enforcement issues. I'd throw rod/reel angling for carp in there too.
That's what the proposal is. This is not creating a special license.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


Yeah as far as rod reel angling for carp needed it under your same license why not. Just add carp into the fine print of species on a license. No harm. And of course they can manage the same as our management on walleye, bass, and catfish on our rivers with no management at all. No size restrictions and no limits and wreck our fisheries. Only with carp it won't matter as they are not going anywhere no matter how many get taken. Its one species that you just can't get rid of.
Maturity is when you have the power to destroy someone who did you wrong but instead you breathe, walk away, and let life take care of them.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12955
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #54 on: June 09, 2022, 09:29:20 AM »
I agree, fishing for any fish, yes.  Crayfish, no.  Are they going to go ticket all the kids at lakes and streams picking them up all summer even if they don't keep them?
Kids don't need fishing licenses

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Good point.  Hopefully they aren't thinking about crayfish punch cards. :chuckle:

Offline Angry Perch

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 12717
  • Location: Sammamish/ Sequim
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #55 on: June 09, 2022, 09:57:34 AM »
IMHO you shouldn't have to have a license to fish for invasive species...

Like bass and walleye?

You could say that even though they're not considered "invasive", but yeah them too, honestly.
I'd catch them by the dozens in the mid Columbia all the time so they're plentiful.
If WDFW wants to promote salmon recovery then i see no reason for them to put fishing for non-native species, that do in fact prey on salmon smolt, behind a paywall.
If your fishing with a pole you should have a license and provide it to a gamey.  Illegal immigrants should no be able to say they are fishing for invasive species and tell the officers to buzz off.
The only issue with the new rules would be bowhunters for carp as previously stated.

This. If I'm on at Potholes dragging around a Lindy Rig and a worm, am I fishing for carp? Perch? Walleyes? Bass?
Low T Beta Male
Domesticated simpy city dwelling male
Low T/ high estrogen = illogical thinking
You must have a learning disability
Low IQ mut [sic] faced bimbo.
You see it here with some of the less intelligent and stable types.
Leveler boy.

Offline Jamieb

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 1862
  • Location: Lacey,WA
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #56 on: June 09, 2022, 12:13:51 PM »
Smelt should require a license, (be covered under a freshwater license.) Crawdads no.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25038
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #57 on: June 09, 2022, 04:48:34 PM »
I'd support including them under the standard license. You need a license for all other forage fish and crustaceans that I'm aware of. The exceptions for smelt and crawdads seems pointless and must certainly create enforcement issues. I'd throw rod/reel angling for carp in there too.
That's what the proposal is. This is not creating a special license.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

It appears that this is some things that the WDFW may request for legislation. Do you have any insight o the Carp Bowfishing issue?
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline NRA4LIFE

  • Site Sponsor
  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 6057
  • Location: Maple Valley
  • Groups: NRA
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #58 on: June 10, 2022, 12:00:41 PM »
IMHO you shouldn't have to have a license to fish for invasive species...

Like bass and walleye?



You could say that even though they're not considered "invasive", but yeah them too, honestly.
I'd catch them by the dozens in the mid Columbia all the time so they're plentiful.
If WDFW wants to promote salmon recovery then i see no reason for them to put fishing for non-native species, that do in fact prey on salmon smolt, behind a paywall.
If your fishing with a pole you should have a license and provide it to a gamey.  Illegal immigrants should no be able to say they are fishing for invasive species and tell the officers to buzz off.
The only issue with the new rules would be bowhunters for carp as previously stated.

This. If I'm on at Potholes dragging around a Lindy Rig and a worm, am I fishing for carp? Perch? Walleyes? Bass?

A Lindy Rig.  That's funny.  If I didn't know already, I could narrow down your origin to probably 2 states.
Look man, some times you just gotta roll the dice

Offline Gobble Doc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 2680
  • Location: Snohomish, WA
Re: Do you support License for smelt and crawdads??
« Reply #59 on: June 10, 2022, 12:21:13 PM »
Could only support more regulation only if WDFW is going to actively enforce it. Otherwise it's purely red tape. If the added license revenue could go to hire an enforcement officer I could support just about anything. Especially if they just took your gear on the spot if anyone is blatantly abusing the resource. 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Today at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Today at 08:24:48 AM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by pcveen
[Today at 08:18:37 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Today at 06:35:57 AM]


In the background by nwwanderer
[Today at 05:33:06 AM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by addicted1
[Yesterday at 09:02:37 PM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 09:02:04 PM]


3 pintails by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 07:20:12 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Yesterday at 05:42:19 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Buckhunter24
[Yesterday at 12:43:12 PM]


2025 Crab! by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 11:09:27 AM]


erronulvin trail cam photos by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 10:19:35 AM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 09:55:24 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal