collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Thoughts on all copper shot.  (Read 2893 times)

Offline Hilltop123

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 2100
  • Location: Up on the Ump
Thoughts on all copper shot.
« on: September 22, 2025, 10:23:15 AM »
I am not going to get into the market conditions, that is shifting some to go all copper for a non toxic shot alternative. But, copper is toxic, to aquatic environments. Doubt me, throw a penny into an aquarium. It wont happen instantly, but it will kill any fish and other critters, eventually. So I figure it is just a matter of time, before copper is banned for at least waterfowl applications. Thoughts? 

Offline O. Nerka

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2018
  • Posts: 96
  • Location: Winthrop, WA
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2025, 11:54:28 AM »
I've never seen copper shotgun loads. Is that a thing?

Offline hunterednate

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2017
  • Posts: 543
  • Location: Tacoma
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2025, 12:28:19 PM »
Yes, Boss is switching to all-copper shot.

Interesting angle on this. I had not considered environmental concerns with a copper load.

The Boss loads are still out of my price range for waterfowl loads. If any of you spring for them this year, I'll be curious to get your in-field performance reviews. I've hunted with the legacy Boss loads (bismuth) in the past and was more "meh" than "wow" for me. I know others who are big fans.

Offline JBG

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 311
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2025, 12:36:42 PM »
Apparently the BOSS copper loads are a copper alloy that is non-toxic even in water.  They are waiting for final non-tox approval according to their FB posts. There is another ammo loader that does have copper shot and a nontoxic bill of health.  Looks like $415/ case or 200 shells.  I'll stick to my hand loaded TSS/steel duplex at that price. 

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8851
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2025, 02:45:52 PM »
I am not going to get into the market conditions, that is shifting some to go all copper for a non toxic shot alternative. But, copper is toxic, to aquatic environments. Doubt me, throw a penny into an aquarium. It wont happen instantly, but it will kill any fish and other critters, eventually. So I figure it is just a matter of time, before copper is banned for at least waterfowl applications. Thoughts?

Hang on there. Everything I can find about aqueous copper toxicity refers to copper sufates, chelated copper compounds Cu(XYZ..)*n, and copper zinc solid solution compounds. I haven’t found anything about metal copper toxicity except in limestone lakes where the carbonic acid can dissolve the copper metal.

Offline metlhead

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 1723
  • Location: sw wa
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2025, 02:56:35 PM »
Biz loads do shoot well and hit hard but for $415 I can get 610 steel loads. I shoot about 50%. My money math says copper is a gimmick.

Offline metlhead

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 1723
  • Location: sw wa
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2025, 03:08:27 PM »
Did a bit of reading and see that tungsten is not difficult to alloy with iron and so much cheaper than toxic copper. Why not just invest effort into a lead equivalent tung/iron shot?

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8851
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2025, 03:11:59 PM »
Tungsten metals are hard

Online HikerHunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2018
  • Posts: 776
  • Location: Federal Way
  • Groups: DU, NWTF, NRA, WHEIA
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2025, 08:52:48 AM »
I think sourcing is component of this too. I thought I heard that they were able to find a domestic source of copper which isn't subject to tariffs.

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38775
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2025, 09:37:09 AM »
One look at this chart and the weight of tungsten compared with other metals and it explains why TSS (tungsten super shot) is so effective.

Copper is a lot cheaper than heavier metals, has less weight than lead but considerably more weight than steel, and copper isn’t nearly as toxic as lead, so copper may be a fairly good alternative to steel shot?

Looks like irridium would be killer!  :chuckle:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Online HikerHunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2018
  • Posts: 776
  • Location: Federal Way
  • Groups: DU, NWTF, NRA, WHEIA
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2025, 10:18:05 AM »
According to that chart, uranium has similar density to tungsten but costs less, could be a good option!

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13131
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2025, 01:55:00 PM »
According to that chart, uranium has similar density to tungsten but costs less, could be a good option!

You can also get one of those hand-held devices to make finding lost birds much easier.   :chuckle:

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13131
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #12 on: September 23, 2025, 01:57:35 PM »
Many, many boats have some sort of copper bottom paint, but that is spread throught the worlds oceans.  I can think of a few public places where there I wouldn't be surprised if there was a ton of shot deposited every season.

You never know, if they ban copper the manufacturers will switch to something else.  I would't buy 10 pallets of copper shot, but I wouldn't be worried for the average waterfowler.  Regulations take time.

Offline BTStewart

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Posts: 42
  • Location: North Idaho
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #13 on: September 23, 2025, 05:33:52 PM »
So far as I know USFWS has only approved pure copper shot with a protective anti-corrosion coating on it so far (which I believe is because it is toxic to aquatic life):

https://www.fws.gov/story/2022-04/nontoxic-shot-regulations-hunting-waterfowl-and-coots-us

Corrosion-inhibited copper - ≥99.9 copper with benzotriazole and thermoplastic fluorescent powder coatings

Offline GWP

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+27)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1797
  • Location: Big Sandy-By Westport
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #14 on: September 23, 2025, 07:27:20 PM »
According to that chart, uranium has similar density to tungsten but costs less, could be a good option!

You can also get one of those hand-held devices to make finding lost birds much easier.   :chuckle:

That got a chuckle! Thanks!
Cuterebra are NOT cute!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Class A Diesel Motorhomes. by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 12:39:49 PM]


GMU 111 Aladdin Moose Hunt 2025! by zwickeyman
[Today at 12:35:06 PM]


Observatory quality bull rifle by Pathfinder101
[Today at 12:20:26 PM]


yakima north youth muzzy cow by Lokaybinnity
[Today at 11:41:00 AM]


Wanted: Deer hide. Mule deer or whitetail that's already tanned by elkboy
[Today at 11:31:58 AM]


Shadypass road / fs5900 closed by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 11:31:09 AM]


Car Covers, good idea or paint hazard? by Alchase
[Today at 11:26:17 AM]


High Hunt by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 11:20:27 AM]


Lolo Elk zone intel by Naches Sportsman
[Today at 09:09:53 AM]


2025 Mt. St. Helens success? by bowhuntersd
[Today at 08:36:59 AM]


Roadless Rule Public Comment by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 11:36:01 PM]


Manson unit - tips, tricks and honey holes! by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 09:22:08 PM]


20Ga Load Testing - Need different shells by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 09:17:53 PM]


Grouse/kids outdoors by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:13:16 PM]


Pack Llamas vs Pack Goats by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 09:11:11 PM]


Bow shows in Yakima area by Gobble Gobble
[Yesterday at 08:00:23 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal