collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Thoughts on all copper shot.  (Read 4061 times)

Online Hilltop123

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 2104
  • Location: Up on the Ump
Thoughts on all copper shot.
« on: September 22, 2025, 10:23:15 AM »
I am not going to get into the market conditions, that is shifting some to go all copper for a non toxic shot alternative. But, copper is toxic, to aquatic environments. Doubt me, throw a penny into an aquarium. It wont happen instantly, but it will kill any fish and other critters, eventually. So I figure it is just a matter of time, before copper is banned for at least waterfowl applications. Thoughts? 

Offline O. Nerka

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2018
  • Posts: 99
  • Location: Winthrop, WA
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2025, 11:54:28 AM »
I've never seen copper shotgun loads. Is that a thing?

Online hunterednate

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2017
  • Posts: 552
  • Location: Tacoma
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2025, 12:28:19 PM »
Yes, Boss is switching to all-copper shot.

Interesting angle on this. I had not considered environmental concerns with a copper load.

The Boss loads are still out of my price range for waterfowl loads. If any of you spring for them this year, I'll be curious to get your in-field performance reviews. I've hunted with the legacy Boss loads (bismuth) in the past and was more "meh" than "wow" for me. I know others who are big fans.

Offline JBG

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 315
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2025, 12:36:42 PM »
Apparently the BOSS copper loads are a copper alloy that is non-toxic even in water.  They are waiting for final non-tox approval according to their FB posts. There is another ammo loader that does have copper shot and a nontoxic bill of health.  Looks like $415/ case or 200 shells.  I'll stick to my hand loaded TSS/steel duplex at that price. 

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8880
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2025, 02:45:52 PM »
I am not going to get into the market conditions, that is shifting some to go all copper for a non toxic shot alternative. But, copper is toxic, to aquatic environments. Doubt me, throw a penny into an aquarium. It wont happen instantly, but it will kill any fish and other critters, eventually. So I figure it is just a matter of time, before copper is banned for at least waterfowl applications. Thoughts?

Hang on there. Everything I can find about aqueous copper toxicity refers to copper sufates, chelated copper compounds Cu(XYZ..)*n, and copper zinc solid solution compounds. I haven’t found anything about metal copper toxicity except in limestone lakes where the carbonic acid can dissolve the copper metal.

Online metlhead

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 1743
  • Location: sw wa
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2025, 02:56:35 PM »
Biz loads do shoot well and hit hard but for $415 I can get 610 steel loads. I shoot about 50%. My money math says copper is a gimmick.

Online metlhead

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 1743
  • Location: sw wa
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2025, 03:08:27 PM »
Did a bit of reading and see that tungsten is not difficult to alloy with iron and so much cheaper than toxic copper. Why not just invest effort into a lead equivalent tung/iron shot?

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8880
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2025, 03:11:59 PM »
Tungsten metals are hard

Offline HikerHunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2018
  • Posts: 783
  • Location: Federal Way
  • Groups: DU, NWTF, NRA, WHEIA
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2025, 08:52:48 AM »
I think sourcing is component of this too. I thought I heard that they were able to find a domestic source of copper which isn't subject to tariffs.

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38850
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2025, 09:37:09 AM »
One look at this chart and the weight of tungsten compared with other metals and it explains why TSS (tungsten super shot) is so effective.

Copper is a lot cheaper than heavier metals, has less weight than lead but considerably more weight than steel, and copper isn’t nearly as toxic as lead, so copper may be a fairly good alternative to steel shot?

Looks like irridium would be killer!  :chuckle:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline HikerHunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2018
  • Posts: 783
  • Location: Federal Way
  • Groups: DU, NWTF, NRA, WHEIA
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2025, 10:18:05 AM »
According to that chart, uranium has similar density to tungsten but costs less, could be a good option!

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13148
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2025, 01:55:00 PM »
According to that chart, uranium has similar density to tungsten but costs less, could be a good option!

You can also get one of those hand-held devices to make finding lost birds much easier.   :chuckle:

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13148
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #12 on: September 23, 2025, 01:57:35 PM »
Many, many boats have some sort of copper bottom paint, but that is spread throught the worlds oceans.  I can think of a few public places where there I wouldn't be surprised if there was a ton of shot deposited every season.

You never know, if they ban copper the manufacturers will switch to something else.  I would't buy 10 pallets of copper shot, but I wouldn't be worried for the average waterfowler.  Regulations take time.

Offline BTStewart

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Posts: 42
  • Location: North Idaho
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #13 on: September 23, 2025, 05:33:52 PM »
So far as I know USFWS has only approved pure copper shot with a protective anti-corrosion coating on it so far (which I believe is because it is toxic to aquatic life):

https://www.fws.gov/story/2022-04/nontoxic-shot-regulations-hunting-waterfowl-and-coots-us

Corrosion-inhibited copper - ≥99.9 copper with benzotriazole and thermoplastic fluorescent powder coatings

Offline GWP

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+27)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1814
  • Location: Big Sandy-By Westport
Re: Thoughts on all copper shot.
« Reply #14 on: September 23, 2025, 07:27:20 PM »
According to that chart, uranium has similar density to tungsten but costs less, could be a good option!

You can also get one of those hand-held devices to make finding lost birds much easier.   :chuckle:

That got a chuckle! Thanks!
Cuterebra are NOT cute!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 02:26:07 PM]


Now licensed in WA OR ID and GA by pianoman9701
[Today at 02:20:32 PM]


Bogachiel boat accident by 7mmfan
[Today at 02:15:58 PM]


CB Radio Hints and Tips, Installing guidance. by ghosthunter
[Today at 02:01:18 PM]


Youth cow tag success by HntnFsh
[Today at 01:58:56 PM]


Hunting with a suppressor - dumb idea? by pickardjw
[Today at 01:52:25 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by WSU
[Today at 01:12:21 PM]


2025 opener by hdshot
[Today at 12:57:52 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by lookingforbirds
[Today at 12:04:06 PM]


Duck Hunting Land Trust by JBG
[Today at 11:48:56 AM]


"Border Lands Conservation Act" courtesy of Mike Lee (R-UT) by kentrek
[Today at 11:09:06 AM]


Cerakote by duramax
[Today at 10:54:05 AM]


New hunter looking for some help by GWP
[Today at 08:06:31 AM]


328/329 reports by Gentrys
[Today at 07:34:05 AM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by hunter399
[Today at 07:20:48 AM]


Buck to Doe Ratio by hunter399
[Today at 05:03:34 AM]


GL Late Tag holders by JakeLand
[Today at 04:20:16 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by Broomd
[Yesterday at 10:27:45 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by fowl smacker
[Yesterday at 09:42:13 PM]


2024 Ford Edge Opinion by mountainman
[Yesterday at 09:28:11 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal