Flooded Corn: Senator Calls USFW To Conduct Formal Study

[hunterednate]

https://www.wildfowlmag.com/editorial/Louisiana-senator-calls-for-formal-study-of-flooded-corn-and-mallard-habits/543551

[hunterednate]

"On January 6, 2025, Louisiana Senator John Kennedy (R-La.) penned a letter to the USFWS Director Brian Nesvik, calling the flooding of corn to attract waterfowl “legal baiting” and asking for the practice to be reviewed, saying that the practice of hunting over flooded corn has been the cause for such a steep decline in duck numbers.

Kennedy shared his concerns about the practice, stating that the practice of hunting over flooded corn “undermines the foundational standards of wildlife conservation.”

This topic has been one of the most heated, vitriol-filled debates among waterfowlers for years. Mostly in the Mississippi and Central flyways. Multiple guides, outfitters, and even legal officials have been outspoken about their opinions on hunting over flooded corn. While many hunters point to changing weather patterns and migration shifts, others state that the flooding of corn fields and other similar crops is to blame for the poor duck harvest numbers.

The letter further reads:

“Mallard harvest in the state of Louisiana dropped 95% from 1999-2021, more than any other state in the Mississippi Flyway. In Missouri, the mallard count rose from 280,000 in 1999 to 550,000 in 2016. This discrepancy is not the result of a growing overall population shifting away their traditional wintering grounds in the southern portions of the Mississippi Flyway. Instead, the data indicates that mallards are concentrating and stopping in regions where the manual flooding of corn has become widespread. Unlike rice, which requires flooding as part of its natural growth cycle, there is no agronomical justification for flooding corn. Put simply, the intentional flooding of standing crops has enabled an unsportsmanlike practice, weakened long-standing protections for migratory birds, and adversely impacted waterfowl populations in Louisiana.”

While the idea that flooding corn is the culprit to the lack of mallards at the bottom of the Mississippi Flyway has its fans, an interview done by WILDFOWL Magazine with Dr. Steve Adair of Ducks Unlimited suggests that there are more factors at play.

“I would say that waterfowl migration patterns have definitely seen some changes,” said Dr. Steve Adair, the Bismarck, North Dakota based chief scientist for Ducks Unlimited. “But there are a number of factors in play, including changing climate conditions, food resources, and changes in disturbances for waterfowl. And depending on the particular year, and how those various factors come together, all of those changes can be different, at least in how they impact ducks and how they move about through the flyways.” (WILDFOWL Magazine, 2023)

That article further explains that weather and climate are the main factors as to why birds aren’t moving south.

‘“There is certainly mounting evidence of ducks wintering further north, and waterfowl that are arriving in southern areas of the country later than they once did and leaving southern places earlier than they used to,” Adair said, noting a recent study of 16 common duck species that winter in the southeastern U.S.
That study, which was reported in the spring of 2021, was a joint effort between the National Audubon Societyand Clemson University’s James C. Kennedy Waterfowl and Wetlands Conservation Center. The resulting work showed that as temperatures have changed in the past 50 years, so have the wintering duck populations noted above, which have shifted northward over time, even if their numbers have remained somewhat steady. (WILDFOWL Magazine, 2023.)

Continued in the letter, Senator Kennedy urges the USFWS to conduct a formal study to evaluate the impact of flooded corn on migratory waterfowl and their behavior.

Kennedy writes:

“Continued declines in southward waterfowl migration will only accelerate this negative trend, further reducing revenues from duck stamps, Pittman-Robertson funding, and other mechanisms vital to waterfowl habitat conservation programs partially reliant on Louisiana hunters with a vested interest in waterfowl. Duck migrations have always been based on a multitude of factors, including varying winter weather patterns, wetland health, hunting pressure, and breeding trends. Recognizing the importance of preventing further habitat degradation in vital breeding grounds like the Prairie Pothole Region is essential to ensuring the future of North American waterfowl. But failing to address the evident change in migratory behavior of a waterfowl population already in serious decline would fall short of the stewardship the resource desperately requires.”

While there is no immediate evidence indicating that flooded corn is the cause of a lack of ducks in the southern part of the Mississippi Flyway, it is worth noting that the states where flooding corn is more prominent have noticed in upward trend in mallard harvest compared to other states (according to USFWS harvest data.)

Some hunters applaud Senator Kennedy’s letter, others wonder if it will make any difference at all.

WILDFOWL Magazine will provide more information as it becomes available.

[BigCutty3]

I hope he’s successful.  Flooded corn plantations have been the end of a lot of areas that used to be good duck hunting.  So much of our state has become barren while outfits like Eagle Lakes brag about shooting “50 limits a day”.  Heck of a use of a public resource.  All they need to do is make it illegal to artificially flood it or hunt over artificially flooded. Birds would still use dry corn like they used to and things would spread out.  So much Public is barren of ducks.  I don’t want to sound like hdshot but imo something needs to be done.

[BigCutty3]

Not to mention the practice condenses birds and likely exposes them to avian influenza.  I mean, we can’t bait deer or elk but it’s ok to bait waterfowl and highly concentrate them? Not consistent logic at all. 

[hunterednate]

I hope he’s successful.  Flooded corn plantations have been the end of a lot of areas that used to be good duck hunting.  So much of our state has become barren while outfits like Eagle Lakes brag about shooting “50 limits a day”.  Heck of a use of a public resource.  All they need to do is make it illegal to artificially flood it or hunt over artificially flooded. Birds would still use dry corn like they used to and things would spread out.  So much Public is barren of ducks.  I don’t want to sound like hdshot but imo something needs to be done.

100% agree

[PsoasHunter]

 

[HikerHunter]

I sure hope that gains traction here as well!

[Fromm]

We all need to write letters to Mr Kennedy and let him know it’s not just a regional problem and keep the ball rolling. We finally have a voice in this matter.

[HUNTINCOUPLE]

Very interesting theories.  This is a humanism problem.  To many humans utilizing the resources.  From fish, big game , small game, and the  waterfowl. There's also the predator pit America is in as well. But always remember the human is the dominant predator good and bad.

[hunterednate]

We all need to write letters to Mr Kennedy and let him know it’s not just a regional problem and keep the ball rolling. We finally have a voice in this matter.

Great idea.

[johnsc6]

Hopefully you know if this gets traction in will most likely end all dry land field hunting.... We don't have corn compound problems here on the west side and we still have 1/2 the mallards of 10 years ago.. They are dead, and the only reason USFW or WDFW doesnt do anything about it is Revenue  $$$

[full choke]

Hopefully you know if this gets traction in will most likely end all dry land field hunting.... We don't have corn compound problems here on the west side and we still have 1/2 the mallards of 10 years ago.. They are dead, and the only reason USFW or WDFW doesnt do anything about it is Revenue  $$$

It doesn’t have to end dry land field hunting.

The issue is growing corn, NOT harvesting it, and ARTIFICIALLY flooding it.

Shouldn’t have any bearing on any other crop (rice, wheat, barley, etc).

[hunterednate]

Hopefully you know if this gets traction in will most likely end all dry land field hunting.... We don't have corn compound problems here on the west side and we still have 1/2 the mallards of 10 years ago.. They are dead, and the only reason USFW or WDFW doesnt do anything about it is Revenue  $$$

A ban on flooded corn would have zero effect on dry field hunting...except to improve it dramatically. This would simply close a loophole in current baiting regulations. Already illegal to dump corn in water - this would make it illegal to artificially dump water in unharvested corn. Ducks feeding in dry corn would then need to fly to water, much of which is accessible to public hunting. It's the corn+water combo that's the problem.

[92xj]

The ban will not be on flooding a corn field, it will be on hunting a flooded corn field. 
You folks think a ban on hunting over “bait” will stop water from touching corn are nuts.   

Corn fields will still be flooded, blinds will be moved accordingly and the public land hunter will still be bitching. 
We might even see some rice fields pop up and blinds over looking them.   Some rice should grown decently on the east side.   

[hdshot]

Unfortunately Louisiana didn’t read the news all states are suffering in steep declines in their mallard harvest.  Most say I’m wrong because they believe every thing is good then their beliefs should be the same nothing wrong with corn ponds. Even got thrown under the bus from a former hunting partner for basically talking about what Louisiana is considered with. 

[Fromm]

The ban will not be on flooding a corn field, it will be on hunting a flooded corn field. 
You folks think a ban on hunting over “bait” will stop water from touching corn are nuts.   

Corn fields will still be flooded, blinds will be moved accordingly and the public land hunter will still be bitching. 
We might even see some rice fields pop up and blinds over looking them.   Some rice should grown decently on the east side.

Artificially flooding a properly harvested corn field is way different than flooding an unharvested field. Field corn produces 6 tons per acre.

[92xj]

The ban will not be on flooding a corn field, it will be on hunting a flooded corn field. 
You folks think a ban on hunting over “bait” will stop water from touching corn are nuts.   

Corn fields will still be flooded, blinds will be moved accordingly and the public land hunter will still be bitching. 
We might even see some rice fields pop up and blinds over looking them.   Some rice should grown decently on the east side.

Artificially flooding a properly harvested corn field is way different than flooding an unharvested field. Field corn produces 6 tons per acre.

Flooding of unharvested corn fields will still take place.    Hunting those fields will “stop”, and shift to other places on the property, but the flooding of standing corn will continue to happen to keep the birds around.   

[Fromm]

If it were made illegal to hunt over unharvested intentionally flooded corn you then would not be able to plant and flood due to it influencing the ducks. A prime example of this is hunters are not allowed to hunt in close proximity to the grain elevators on the Columbia and snake rivers because of the influence they have on them

[92xj]

You’re not getting it.  But that’s ok. 
When or if this ever happens, we’ll revisit this thread and I guarantee you, there will be standing corn fields with water in them.   Not saying they will be hunted, but there will be water filled fields.   

[Fromm]

You’re not getting it.  But that’s ok. 
When or if this ever happens, we’ll revisit this thread and I guarantee you, there will be standing corn fields with water in them.   Not saying they will be hunted, but there will be water filled fields.   

I do get it.  If flooded unharvested corn was outlawed then under current area of influence laws you would not be allowed to hunt around it. Look at the buffer fish and game put around the grain elevator at wallula.

[johnsc6]

Hopefully you know if this gets traction in will most likely end all dry land field hunting.... We don't have corn compound problems here on the west side and we still have 1/2 the mallards of 10 years ago.. They are dead, and the only reason USFW or WDFW doesnt do anything about it is Revenue  $$$

A ban on flooded corn would have zero effect on dry field hunting...except to improve it dramatically. This would simply close a loophole in current baiting regulations. Already illegal to dump corn in water - this would make it illegal to artificially dump water in unharvested corn. Ducks feeding in dry corn would then need to fly to water, much of which is accessible to public hunting. It's the corn+water combo that's the problem.

And you have faith that when the government gets done changing the rules it will only be artificially flooded fields?  If so you have more faith there ability to manage than I do... I dont hunt artificially flooded corn, but Im not for giving the government any reason to target any hunting methods. Bear baiting, hound hunting, bow hunting any of it, Seems slippery to me