collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Tribal police on Roosevelt jurisdiction  (Read 1313 times)

Offline Henrydog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 1145
  • Location: Eastern Washington
  • Groups: NRA Life Member, RMEF, Phesants Forever
Tribal police on Roosevelt jurisdiction
« on: Yesterday at 07:28:19 AM »
Saturday we fished the Spokane Arm of Roosevelt.  Pretty good walleye day, decent weather all in all a good day.  My kid landed his personal best 9lbs wally.  But soon our main discussion in the boat was we watched a Spokane Tribel Police boat, a green North River, cruise up and down the river.  They went into a couple of beaches.  They did not check anyone but pulled to shore a couple of times.  No one was on the beach fishing.  I understand they patrol their land (north side of the river) but am I incorrect in thinking they have no jurisdiction to stop anyone on the water since it is a federal waterway?

Offline dwils233

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 623
  • Location: Spokane County
Re: Tribal police on Roosevelt jurisdiction
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 08:47:39 AM »
I think there's a couple ways they could have jurisdiction, but I have no idea if they do?

-A Formal MOU or joint enforcement agreement with the NPS

-Sovereignty agreement/reservation borders that extend to the middle of the lake

-Something written into the Lake Roosevelt designation agreement

Not an exhaustive list and not definitive, but it's definitely possible. Honestly, from what I understand of both Lake Roosevelt enforcement staff levels and current WDFW game warden staff levels....probably not a bad thing to have them out there. Even just for safety and on-water response these days.
A promise made is a debt unpaid, and the trail has its own stern code

Offline Henrydog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 1145
  • Location: Eastern Washington
  • Groups: NRA Life Member, RMEF, Phesants Forever
Re: Tribal police on Roosevelt jurisdiction
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 08:52:46 AM »
Agree...not a bad thing to have them out on the water.  Kid and I just discussed for hours IF they could do anything on the water to a non member?

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13136
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Tribal police on Roosevelt jurisdiction
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 08:56:13 AM »
I have had similar thoughts about the City of Everett PD patrolling out in MA 8 & 9, I assumed the situation was there was an additional agreement in place beyond their normal jurisdictional boundaries.

Offline baldopepper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 2748
Re: Tribal police on Roosevelt jurisdiction
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 09:40:43 AM »
Possible they weren't doing enforcement at all.  Last year about this time one of their boats pulled into the cove by my place and the guys said they were doing a little pre scouting for net placement. About a month later they did put one out.

Offline ASHQUACK

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 1041
Re: Tribal police on Roosevelt jurisdiction
« Reply #5 on: Today at 08:58:53 AM »
Some tribal police have cross commission with their areas agency giving them jurisdiction outside the actual reservation. Say, Squaxin police carry a Mason County commission they are able to commit law enforcement activities outside their jurisdictional boundaries.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2026 Sheds “Found one” by Ridge Roamer
[Today at 12:29:02 PM]


Interested in speaking at the April meeting? CCW has you covered. by Firstgenhunter
[Today at 11:56:10 AM]


Coyote broke my cage by pashok23
[Today at 11:14:20 AM]


Idaho Non-Res draw results by Mtnwalker
[Today at 10:48:39 AM]


Tribal police on Roosevelt jurisdiction by ASHQUACK
[Today at 08:58:53 AM]


Almost a wrap #1 by Loup Loup
[Today at 08:17:17 AM]


Inter Mountain Furharvesters 3/14/26 sale by Machias
[Today at 07:13:53 AM]


Almost a wrap #4 by Machias
[Today at 07:11:34 AM]


Almost a wrap #3 by Machias
[Today at 07:10:14 AM]


Almost a wrap #2 by Machias
[Today at 07:08:27 AM]


Montana Big Game Combo Draw chances by ganghis
[Today at 06:40:51 AM]


HIGH HUNT DUMB QUESTION by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 11:51:52 PM]


Internal WDFW memo triggering investigation into commission now public. by highcountry_hunter
[Yesterday at 06:30:42 PM]


Free Speech and standing up for WA hunters and Sportsmen by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 06:20:50 PM]


Unable to get kids' hunter-ed certificates into WDFW system by 762Gunner
[Yesterday at 04:44:26 PM]


What to do?? by hookr88
[Yesterday at 04:25:07 PM]


2026 Coyotes by redi
[Yesterday at 04:08:39 PM]


Spring bear 2026 by Machias
[Yesterday at 12:23:42 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by Scvette
[Yesterday at 08:49:53 AM]


.45-70 Loads and Twist Rate by birddogdad
[Yesterday at 08:38:12 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal