collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW Enforcement Study  (Read 2017 times)

Offline dbllunger

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 1072
  • Those who can do. Those who can't complain.
WDFW Enforcement Study
« on: September 30, 2009, 10:53:32 AM »
http://wdfw.wa.gov/enforcement/iacp_staffing_study.html

Found this on the web sight.  Probably biased a little, but it appears that the enforcement division is substantially understaffed on the guy working in the field side. 

Offline Okano-gun

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 99
  • Location: Twisp
Re: WDFW Enforcement Study
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2009, 10:36:52 AM »
148 officers for the whole state, including the marine division. plus a court system that does not take fish and wildlife crimes seriously. no wonder theres so much poaching

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: WDFW Enforcement Study
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2009, 02:49:37 PM »
This demonstrates a big prioritization problem in WDFW; 1500+ employees, over half in Olympia.  I don't begrudge Olympia 800+ employees, except when it constrains having adequate resources deployed statewide.  This is an outcome of Czar Koenings' perception that WDFW should provide the Director's office unlimited support, and whatever was left over could be deployed to the field.  I hope Director Anderson takes a really hard look at the Department's resources and priorities from a core mission, rather than bureaucratic, perspective.  The state office should be supporting core mission functions in the field, rather than perpetuating state government.
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline PolarBear

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 10468
  • Location: Tatooine
Re: WDFW Enforcement Study
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2009, 02:55:37 PM »
I talked to my buddy at the Vail check station today and he was telling me about all of the violations that come through every day.  He said that they could pay to have 2 officers up there just in fines but they have only volunteers and no way to enforce the law. 

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: WDFW Enforcement Study
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2009, 03:15:58 PM »
This demonstrates a big prioritization problem in WDFW; 1500+ employees, over half in Olympia.  I don't begrudge Olympia 800+ employees, except when it constrains having adequate resources deployed statewide.  This is an outcome of Czar Koenings' perception that WDFW should provide the Director's office unlimited support, and whatever was left over could be deployed to the field.  I hope Director Anderson takes a really hard look at the Department's resources and priorities from a core mission, rather than bureaucratic, perspective.  The state office should be supporting core mission functions in the field, rather than perpetuating state government.

Too many administrative positions, including Regional offices...........always has been, probably always will be.  Don't expect anything to change. 
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

How I Cape for a Shoulder Mount by ASHQUACK
[Today at 08:06:40 AM]


Bear Paw Outfitters Idaho Elk and Deer Hunt Units 77,78,79 by Pathfinder101
[Today at 07:49:42 AM]


Going to try my hand at calling. by Pathfinder101
[Today at 07:33:42 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by westside bull
[Today at 07:30:38 AM]


Trapline Taxidermy - wholehearted endorsement by Pathfinder101
[Today at 07:27:38 AM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by Troutfins
[Today at 01:46:06 AM]


Colville lodging, any recommendations? by duckboy23
[Yesterday at 10:42:59 PM]


No upland with dog during deer and elk season? by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 09:51:23 PM]


Rabbits looking good so far! by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 09:48:30 PM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 08:05:21 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by highside74
[Yesterday at 08:03:35 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Sakko300wsm
[Yesterday at 07:53:45 PM]


Whats your play by Mfowl
[Yesterday at 07:38:41 PM]


The 33 year quest by blackveltbowhunter
[Yesterday at 07:09:47 PM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 06:20:25 PM]


F150 Ecoboost Guys by IdeehoT
[Yesterday at 05:59:07 PM]


Duck Hunting Land Trust by metlhead
[Yesterday at 05:46:37 PM]


It was a great year by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 05:26:16 PM]


Harlequin in weird places? by Itsintheblood
[Yesterday at 05:01:08 PM]


Anti-fog for glass by wadu1
[Yesterday at 02:09:42 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal