Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
Advertisement
Advertise Here
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Scanned Photo Resolution Question (Read 1019 times)
gramps
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
Location: SE Wa.
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
on:
December 02, 2009, 11:52:30 AM »
If I scan a 35mm negative at 6400 x 9600 or close to it, will this produce a reasonable quality printed photo size 8 x 10 or 11 x 14?? "Reasonable" does not mean pro-quality, just reasonably good.
thanks
Logged
It never changes, but it is always different.
Advertise Here
popeshawnpaul
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3583
Location: Bellevue, WA
Re: Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
Reply #1 on:
December 02, 2009, 01:25:27 PM »
You are fine all the way down to 120 dpi or dots per inch. I prefer 300 dpi if I can. If you are making an 8x10 that would be 2400x3000 pixels. You might want to scan at a higher resolution than that and then downsize it to make it look better. Scanning at more than the optical resolution would be a waste and would more than likely not look better. I think most scanners optically max out at 3000 or 4000 dpi. Avoid interpolated or digital resolution above the optical maximum.
Your print will look fine.
Logged
www.WSBowhunters.com
www.shawnmccully.com
gramps
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
Location: SE Wa.
Re: Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
Reply #2 on:
December 02, 2009, 06:40:52 PM »
Thanks Shawn. I am maybe looking at more scanner than I really need. You answer to a similar question a long time ago was to rent a photo scanner from an outfit in Seattle which was a great suggestion..but that option just won't work for me now.
Tks
Logged
It never changes, but it is always different.
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
What boots?
by
fishngamereaper
[
Today
at 03:42:32 PM]
Real world feedback needed: Rangefinder Binos
by
Atlas1993
[
Today
at 03:39:46 PM]
Late Alta Muzzy
by
Kingofthemountain83
[
Today
at 03:39:16 PM]
Pepper Jack tillimook
by
HUNTINCOUPLE
[
Today
at 03:25:04 PM]
Eastern Washington Late Archery
by
Pegasus
[
Today
at 02:49:37 PM]
Let's talk tags
by
elk_sniper
[
Today
at 02:43:26 PM]
Calling Bears
by
dilleytech
[
Today
at 01:46:49 PM]
Xlr element vs mdt hnt26
by
Camo
[
Today
at 01:04:21 PM]
Bow shop around tacoma-seattle area?
by
pianoman9701
[
Today
at 12:55:48 PM]
Muzzleloader scope options
by
bullfisher
[
Today
at 11:43:31 AM]
2025 Quality Chewuch Tag
by
Schmalzfam
[
Today
at 11:30:25 AM]
New world record mule?
by
elk_sniper
[
Today
at 11:20:50 AM]
East Oak smokers?
by
Sandberm
[
Today
at 09:52:22 AM]
Question about hunting wilderness areas
by
highcountry_hunter
[
Today
at 09:25:00 AM]
Drew Pogue Quality
by
rmadsen
[
Today
at 08:10:23 AM]
My Entiat Late tag thread
by
MerriamMagician
[
Today
at 07:50:39 AM]
Whos going out for late muzzy Elk?
by
HereDuckyDucky
[
Today
at 06:24:23 AM]
Nevada bull hunt 2025
by
BeerBugler
[
Today
at 05:41:12 AM]
Reloder 22 In Stock
by
HereDuckyDucky
[
Today
at 05:20:41 AM]
Wowzers
by
NOCK NOCK
[
Today
at 05:01:41 AM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal