collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 3 point or better units  (Read 19006 times)

Offline WAmuleyHunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 549
  • Location: East Wenatchee, Washington
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #30 on: December 22, 2009, 06:19:29 PM »
i am all for a few four point or better units.  I think are trophy units this would be a great thing.  I love the three point or better rule, i hope it never disappears.  I also would like to see a few tags for just those big two points for the youth or actually for anybody, november hunts, just for two points. anyone can put in for them. I am sure most people that would put in for this would be youth or disabled hunters but guess with only a couple points might as well.  I know i wouldn't mine drawing that tag and taking one of these smoker forked horns.

Garrett

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #31 on: December 22, 2009, 06:20:12 PM »
Andrew, your idea would work better if they limited it to one or maximium of two choices for special permits. For point restrictions I am mostly refering to muledeer.  Whitetails can have three points with milk on their lips.  I'll leave it up to the experts to tell me what blacktails should be.  

Offline Buckmark

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 5445
  • Location: GPS is searching
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #32 on: December 22, 2009, 06:28:27 PM »
For the guys that are saying "2 point only tag", are you saying for smooth 2 points, no eye guards or even small stickers? So we would have people that would be looking for and have to field judge if the buck is a solid 2 only?
Heck there are guys who cant count to 3 or tell what an inch looks like right now with the 3pt or better rule so i dont think a smooth 2 only rule would work at all, whoops didnt see the sticker/eye guard let it lay. That happens now with the 3pnt rule only backwards..
To hunt and butcher an animal is to recognize that meat is not some abstract form of protein that springs into existence tightly wrapped in cellophane and styrofoam.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #33 on: December 22, 2009, 06:30:09 PM »
Probably the same thing

Offline banannaclip

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 519
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #34 on: December 22, 2009, 07:22:46 PM »
i like the 3-point or better,some units have already for senoirs,and young hunters a any buck hunt  so if they see a whopper they can harvest it, but they also can harvest a spike,2-point.if you want bigger bucks push the season to november and have a 4-point minium.

Offline chad s.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 78
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #35 on: December 22, 2009, 07:23:55 PM »
Our deer camp has harvested a lot more deer since the 3 point min went into effect. I'd be all for a four point minimum, because I have no desire to shoot many 3 points I've seen.
cs

Offline fishunt247

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 896
  • Location: Yakima, WA
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #36 on: December 22, 2009, 08:01:53 PM »
Of everything I've read so far, I think there have been two great ideas proposed: 4pt minimum in areas traditionally known to have trophy potential (maybe Entiat, Swakane, Alta, Mission, Teanaway, and an open country unit like the Ritzville for guys like me) to attract those who are after something special, and two point only youth tags in every unit. But with the two point tags, as many small two points will get killed as mature stagnated two's.

Offline swanny

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1852
  • Location: Kent
    • 9to5active
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #37 on: December 22, 2009, 08:38:04 PM »
I imagine if it went to 4point or better you would see a decrease in tags purchased. Most people tend to only get a weekend to hunt and limiting them with what they can get even more would probably deter them from even going. People buying less tags means even less money for a department that is already hurting for funding.

Offline fly4fish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 266
  • Location: WA
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #38 on: December 22, 2009, 08:51:36 PM »
The 3 point minimum rule is a great rule for mule deer, but it needs to be revamped.  It should be 3 points above the ears.  No 1.5 year old deer should get punished for having the good genetics to produce an eye gaurd at such a young dumb age.  Its like having a death sentence to grow an eye gaurd.  It is unfortunate there can't be a rule that all bucks have to be atleast 3 of 4 years old to harvest.  Obviously this would be impossible to expect everyone to know how to judge deer age, but it would work well.  Every year there would be a new crop of nice bucks, kind of like a limitted entry unit.  To me age matters more than size, I wont shoot a deer that Im think is not atleast 4 years old, they provide the challenge I am looking for and I think they deserve to live to maturity.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32899
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #39 on: December 22, 2009, 09:56:20 PM »
Quote
I imagine if it went to 4point or better you would see a decrease in tags purchased. Most people tend to only get a weekend to hunt and limiting them with what they can get even more would probably deter them from even going.

Swanny, with the general hunt only 8 days long, how many weekends do they have to choose from anyway. :chuckle:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Kowsrule30

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 3044
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #40 on: December 22, 2009, 10:13:37 PM »
I like the 3 point min rule..... For Mule Deer.... I've passed up a lot of small 3's and have tried my damndest to put a 3rd on some huge 2's..... The unit I hunt has also been through some bad winters, cougars are running the place, and that deer lice thing hit hard.... Saw a bunch of balding deer..... So IMO the GMU of my choice should be closed to deer hunting for a year or two and cougs should be unlimited....  :twocents: I use to see a lot of nice bucks and a bunch more does.... Not so much any more....  :dunno:  I'm not the expert.... So take it or leave it....

Offline longstevo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1000
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #41 on: December 22, 2009, 10:17:32 PM »
I haven't seen a huge handful of four points in my hunting career, but I have seen many three points.  So if the four point rule went into effect, I don't know if I'd see a lot of shootable deer.  

But such is the rules.  My favorite hunting unit when from a two point min. to a three point min. about two years ago.  And while I haven't had a lot of time to devote to there, but I haven't seen a huge influx of big bucks, so I don't really know.  :dunno:
If you don't stand behind the troops, please feel free to stand in front of us.

Offline Crowns

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 148
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #42 on: December 22, 2009, 10:41:53 PM »
I can understand both the ideas of 3-point above the ears and 4-point minimums. I really dont think THAT many 2-points with eye guards are shot but they certainly would seem to have better genes if young. However, I would lean more towards the 4-point minimum. I would say that 85% of bucks 4-point or better, even with eyeguards, are 3 1/2+ so that would let them get a good jump start on getting to that mature age. I have read studies that say skeletal growth ends at the age of 3 1/2 and muscle growth is 5 1/2 (5 1/2-8 1/2 is generally peak antler growth). Just my  :twocents:.

Offline alecvg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 1832
  • Location: Whatcom County/Helena MT
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #43 on: December 22, 2009, 10:44:37 PM »
The problem that I have with any buck youth hunts is the same that I have with doe youth hunts, a lot of the Dads fill that tag and not the kids.  I personally know (but won't hunt with) folks who push their kids through hunters safety at a very young age just to get special youth permits and fill them themselves while Jr. is sleeping in the backseat of the rig.  (Like the guy who tried to fill his daughter's doe tag in my front yard)  It would be a great opportunity for kids but an equally great opportunity for bend the rules type of Dads, IMO.

That is true, and I have heard of that many times, but in my opinion, thats what happens.  We can't just take away youth tags because some dads break the rules.  Youth tags are what get kids into hunting, it did with me.  I think youth tags are necessary.   :twocents:
I would rather be a conservative nut job, than a liberal with no nuts, and no job!

Offline alecvg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 1832
  • Location: Whatcom County/Helena MT
Re: 3 point or better units
« Reply #44 on: December 22, 2009, 10:49:01 PM »
i like the 3-point or better,some units have already for senoirs,and young hunters a any buck hunt  so if they see a whopper they can harvest it, but they also can harvest a spike,2-point.if you want bigger bucks push the season to november and have a 4-point minium.

As fun as that would be, for a while, too many deer would die, hunting the rut with rifle, just about anyone can get a 4 point.  And alot of people would do it.
I would rather be a conservative nut job, than a liberal with no nuts, and no job!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 10:28:23 AM]


Utah cow elk hunt by kselkhunter
[Today at 09:03:55 AM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Today at 07:03:46 AM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by Sneaky
[Today at 04:09:53 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Yesterday at 11:25:17 PM]


THE ULTIMATE QUAD!!!! by Deer slayer
[Yesterday at 10:33:55 PM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 09:41:28 PM]


Oregon spring bear by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 04:40:38 PM]


Tree stand for Western Washingtn by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 04:37:01 PM]


Pocket Carry by BKMFR
[Yesterday at 03:34:12 PM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Yesterday at 01:15:11 PM]


Range finders & Angle Compensation by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 11:58:48 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Yesterday at 10:55:29 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 08:40:03 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal