collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolves in WA  (Read 19241 times)

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #30 on: February 12, 2008, 04:26:22 PM »
My biggest problem with the wolf reintroduction is that it is not a "reintroduction".  It is a non native species to the lower 48 states.  The wolf that populated the lower 48 was smaller, weaker, and more succeptible to the elements and disease.  Nature could help control their numbers.  You may as well bring in Polar Bears.
You're right...that was a bonehead move!  I'm not sure where they were native to, but they are a bigger animal than the "original".

Offline Houndhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 3027
  • Location: Continental Divide
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #31 on: February 12, 2008, 04:39:03 PM »
my guess would be russia

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #32 on: February 12, 2008, 04:41:43 PM »
northern Canada, Yukon etc picture a 150lb chainsaw with legs that prefers the temperature at 40 below :o

There Packs will fit in perfect in the methow and Entiat wintering grounds.........
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #33 on: February 12, 2008, 05:01:22 PM »
This would be the daily show at oak creek for the wolf lovers.


[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrQbXJNj1vk[/youtube]
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline jake

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 151
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #34 on: February 12, 2008, 08:12:25 PM »
hound hunter i didnt mean to come off aggressive toward you,sorry about that, just a difference  of opinions , so no hard feelings? wolves no wolves us hunters got to stick together,

Offline Houndhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 3027
  • Location: Continental Divide
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #35 on: February 12, 2008, 08:35:23 PM »
no offense taken, just different opinions
and as the rest of the guys say on here, ill buy ya a round somtime :brew:

damnit, guna have to wait a few years till i can do that...... legally ;)

Offline MikeWalking

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 4667
  • Location: Woodinville
  • Patches Pal
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #36 on: February 13, 2008, 08:46:04 AM »
Quote
no offense taken, just different opinions
and as the rest of the guys say on here, ill buy ya a round somtime

damnit, guna have to wait a few years till i can do that...... legally 
 
 

?? I was legal at 17?  Oh yeah I was on Active Duty I forgot. :chuckle:

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #37 on: February 13, 2008, 12:30:38 PM »
http://www.saveourelk.com/

please watch the slide show.
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline whitey

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 1831
  • Location: Western Washington
  • thank a soldier
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #38 on: February 13, 2008, 01:48:38 PM »
My Brother lives up in Whitefish and He says these animals Do so much damage it cant be controlled using legal methods. The 3 S system is what he says the farmers use. Shoot, Shovel,Shut up. Wildlife has to be managed. Period. I Do not mean managed with illegal pratices either.

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #39 on: February 13, 2008, 01:52:43 PM »
I would love to be able to get a wolf tag and participate in a lower 48 wolf hunt, but i don't agree with the SSS rule.  It's not worth getting in BIG trouble for. 

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #40 on: February 13, 2008, 01:58:33 PM »
Poisoning, snaring and trapping are best bets for wolf control :dunno:
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #41 on: February 13, 2008, 02:17:29 PM »
I'd like to trap one also...
Poisoning is a bad idea because of the nontarget kill...birds, scavengers,...

Offline JoshT

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 738
  • Location: Sweeping the leg!
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #42 on: February 13, 2008, 02:27:50 PM »
I think he meant 'lead poisoning'.

Strike Hard...
Strike Fast...
No Mercy, SIR!

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #43 on: February 13, 2008, 02:31:37 PM »
Poisoning used to be a popular way to get rid of predators.   People would lace a carcass with poison and let the critters eat on it and then die.  The problem is you have NO way to know what's eating the poison.  I suspect lots of birds and other non target animals died that way.

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Wolves in WA
« Reply #44 on: February 13, 2008, 02:32:48 PM »
Poisoning used to be a popular way to get rid of predators.   People would lace a carcass with poison and let the critters eat on it and then die.  The problem is you have NO way to know what's eating the poison.  I suspect lots of birds and other non target animals died that way.

It worked well in eradicating the wolves the first time.......
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Meet Kumpel by metlhead
[Today at 09:18:52 PM]


East Side Quail Numbers? by metlhead
[Today at 09:12:09 PM]


Shooting someone else's injured buck - etiquette question by Gentrys
[Today at 08:50:06 PM]


Shotgun with a bulging barrel by Remnar
[Today at 08:30:06 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by pashok23
[Today at 08:28:17 PM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 07:55:47 PM]


Fishing the East Cape in Baja? by jamesfromseattle
[Today at 07:29:16 PM]


Pork belly burnt ends by Fidelk
[Today at 06:38:17 PM]


New Litter Sired by RainShadow Stud, "Ollie" by rainshadow1
[Today at 04:08:49 PM]


Late Season Elk Unit 672 by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 02:07:02 PM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by Birdguy
[Today at 01:33:34 PM]


Xlr element vs mdt hnt26 by jrebel
[Today at 11:08:15 AM]


Idaho youth Jr mentored hunter question. by teanawayslayer
[Today at 10:25:11 AM]


Wasted Bethel bull by firepin
[Today at 08:25:00 AM]


My daughters first deer. by pashok23
[Today at 08:23:28 AM]


117 moose Nov. tags! by bearpaw
[Today at 08:15:57 AM]


F150 Ecoboost Guys by CP
[Today at 08:15:11 AM]


Any MT deer updates? by mburrows
[Today at 08:13:04 AM]


Big old and heavy by hunter399
[Today at 08:01:37 AM]


As He Lay by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 09:01:46 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal