collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?  (Read 11489 times)

Offline Bearhunter

  • Go in Lite come out Heavy!
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1994
  • Location: Sedro-Woolley
Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« on: June 21, 2010, 12:08:13 PM »
Ok guys what in your opinions is the most accurate, mid budget or top end budget muzzleloader out there.  Up until last year I had a Knight Bighorn 50cal which seemed to be a good gun.  I am in the market for a new one this week and am looking for suggestions.  Thanks James
Go in Lite come out Heavy!

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31541
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2010, 12:15:31 PM »
the most popular guns out there from what i have seen is the t/c blackdiamond not made anymore,bighorn which you have, cva elk horn, and white rifles. i have the blackdiamond xr and the elkhorn and the elk horn is a inline bolt action muzzle loader and is my go to gun. they run black on black about 290.00 and black and cam 340.00 you will not be disapointed with this gun it is a great gun check them out wholesale sports is where i have bought mine.
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2010, 12:25:13 PM »
You want the top of the line...  Look at Savage 10ML-II .50 caliber.  Many very good writeup's and it is also modern powder capable as well (which is illegal in Washington today).  It is also capable of 1 inch groups at 100 yards as well. 
275 down 2

Offline Bearhunter

  • Go in Lite come out Heavy!
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1994
  • Location: Sedro-Woolley
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2010, 01:03:48 PM »
I no longer have the bighorn so Im in the market for a new one.
Go in Lite come out Heavy!

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31541
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2010, 02:34:26 PM »
yeah i ment which you had i figured you sold it from your post. looks at the elkhorn and see what you think.
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2010, 02:38:02 PM »
The Savage is not legal for hunting in this state, no matter which powder you use in it.

Offline whacker1

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 5816
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2010, 02:39:23 PM »
look used as there aren't many options in brand new in-lines.

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31541
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2010, 02:55:41 PM »
The Savage is not legal for hunting in this state, no matter which powder you use in it.

that is right i just talked to there factory today and they said they do not make any conversions to make the gun shoot 11 or musket caps because it got me thinking. so it is not a legal gun here from what i have talked to them from and seen online don't drop 600-800 on one you can;t use here :chuckle:
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline beagledog

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 265
  • Location: Tri-Citys
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2010, 06:15:00 PM »
CVA makes a desent mid range gun as they also make winchester muzzys . I had a winchester X 150 and got rid of it because I thought it was to heavy to pack all day in the hills but it was a sweet shooter. I too would keep an eye out for a used Knight or tompson if your not in a real big hurry.

Offline OneShot4x4

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 29
  • Location: Puyallup, WA
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2010, 06:24:41 PM »
CVA Buckhorn 50 cal. @ Cabelas for $149 after $20 coupon.  You need to spend another $11 for the WA legal conversion.
IAFF Local 31

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2010, 06:34:56 PM »
The Savage is not legal for hunting in this state, no matter which powder you use in it.

that is right i just talked to there factory today and they said they do not make any conversions to make the gun shoot 11 or musket caps because it got me thinking. so it is not a legal gun here from what i have talked to them from and seen online don't drop 600-800 on one you can;t use here :chuckle:

So if it did use a nipple it would be legal.   I am sure there must be an after market nipple for the rifle.  Either way... Many states allow the 209 primer. 
275 down 2

Offline beagledog

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 265
  • Location: Tri-Citys
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2010, 06:41:31 PM »

So if it did use a nipple it would be legal.   I am sure there must be an after market nipple for the rifle.  Either way... Many states allow the 209 primer. 
[/quote]

Not many of the western states allow 209 primers
Oregon doesnt even allow fiber optic sights

Offline Bofire

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 5524
  • Location: Yelm
  • Harley YAR YAR YAR!
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2010, 06:43:05 PM »
 :)I do not think the Thompson pro hunter(etc) is legal either
Carl
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!

I do not shop at Amazon

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31541
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #13 on: June 21, 2010, 06:49:08 PM »
So if it did use a nipple it would be legal.   I am sure there must be an after market nipple for the rifle.  Either way... Many states allow the 209 primer. 
[/quote]

there is very few states that have the restricitons that we do thepro hunter is not legal here either. and i talked to them and i am sure i posted that i talked to them today and they said they did not make one. there is a few things to make them legal here that gun is not.
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Inline Muzzleloader opinions?
« Reply #14 on: June 21, 2010, 07:26:19 PM »
The Savage is not legal for hunting in this state, no matter which powder you use in it.

that is right i just talked to there factory today and they said they do not make any conversions to make the gun shoot 11 or musket caps because it got me thinking. so it is not a legal gun here from what i have talked to them from and seen online don't drop 600-800 on one you can;t use here :chuckle:

So if it did use a nipple it would be legal.   I am sure there must be an after market nipple for the rifle.  Either way... Many states allow the 209 primer. 

It still wouldn't be legal because it wouldn't be "exposed to the elements."

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

My Entiat Late tag thread by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 10:15:40 PM]


Stevens double barrel 410 by scotsman
[Yesterday at 09:39:58 PM]


Xlr element vs mdt hnt26 by dmoua
[Yesterday at 09:30:35 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by Harbor_hunter
[Yesterday at 09:09:52 PM]


My Wenaha bull by clearwater
[Yesterday at 09:06:15 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:55:39 PM]


East Side Quail Numbers? by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 08:55:20 PM]


Hunting late season, where would you go? by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 07:43:16 PM]


BNSF Land Access by ducksdogsdownriggers
[Yesterday at 07:07:38 PM]


Late Season archery elk by jason stevens
[Yesterday at 06:26:12 PM]


Upland bird carry options by GWP
[Yesterday at 05:28:01 PM]


3 pintails by hdshot
[Yesterday at 05:23:19 PM]


Game Warden Channel featuring my nephew on Nevada Wild by danderson
[Yesterday at 03:51:08 PM]


Hunting DNR Natural Area Preserves by avidnwoutdoorsman
[Yesterday at 03:26:14 PM]


Flynn’s Hunts!!! by Tafinder
[Yesterday at 12:37:35 PM]


Dash cams by jrebel
[Yesterday at 12:25:23 PM]


Mechanic help 4.0 ford by Woodchuck
[Yesterday at 11:50:39 AM]


Slide Ridge Quality tag holders by throttlejocky20
[Yesterday at 11:41:05 AM]


F150 Ecoboost Guys by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 11:25:53 AM]


Buck to Doe Ratio by OutHouse
[Yesterday at 11:11:15 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal