Free: Contests & Raffles.
I bet we don't hear again from LRP
Mulehunter, that's a great story. But, someone asked for the other side of the story. Here it is. First, there were not 5 biologist, only one, the others as you know were houndsmen like Mulehunter, volunteers, and not paid. So, only 1 paid employee. Second, Mulehunter did turn his dogs out on that cougar, and the biologist, and volunteer left. He could have pursued that cat but didn't. I know, we all get worked up when we hear these things, but lets remain calm do the right things, not hurt our selves. Mulehunter had a great experience in Gods country and knows that. Only about 5% of the hunters in this state will ever experience that. Treasure those times. And remember, that biologist is working for you, so yes you need to comment on what the State does. But, hostility will not get you anywhere. His research does determine those quota's. This is the first time I have been to this site, saw the post, knew I had to comment, registered, made my comment, and that's the truth. Shoot straight my friends, and yes there is two sides to a story. My God be with you and take care of you in the field.LRP
OK Fred, some of us biologists are working for you...please dont generalize too broadly...
And PLEASE the bios are working for us, give me a break. You mean like the bios who planted lynx fur and have lied to us over and over through the years, is that what your referring to when you say they are working for us?
Quote from: Machias on December 14, 2010, 01:28:15 PMAnd PLEASE the bios are working for us, give me a break. You mean like the bios who planted lynx fur and have lied to us over and over through the years, is that what your referring to when you say they are working for us?Statements like that make me glad I'm not a state wildlife bio anymore. It gets old getting kicked in the teeth and called a liar by the people one works for, and can't deliver everything they want within a liberal democratic government. Being a fisheries or game biologist can be great work, but working within Washington state government is a formula for frustration.
As for the criticism of collaring/marking during an open season in general - careful what you wish for. The way to get around that is to close hunting or fishing in an area where marking is occuring. As an example, if fisherment wanted to protest having to release ad-clipped steelhead in the upper Columbia that have holes punched in their tails - the marking would not stop, the season would be closed or retention prohibited.
Yes as sportsmen of this state we should all just be thankful the WDFW allows us to even venture into the woods and onto the waterways. We should just shut the hell up and be thankful and no matter what they do we should thank them and go quietly away and allow them to do their most important work so as not to anger them lest we be on the receiving end of their fury.
I'm sorry fellas, got my panties in a twist, I apologize to those offended. I am using too broad of a brush when painting a picture and that is wrong, sorry.