collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 270 bullet weight  (Read 8926 times)

Offline toothfangclaw

  • newbe
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 1769
  • Location: Everett, WA
270 bullet weight
« on: March 01, 2011, 09:10:34 PM »
So, what would be a good bullet weight to hunt deer and elk with for the 270 win? I have a friend that is going to let me use his reloading equipment, so now I just need to get the bullets. I have my gun sighted in for 130, but I am wondering if 150 or higher would be better? How do I choose the right weight?

Offline JackOfAllTrades

  • Rasbo said I Ain't Right.
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 6509
  • Location: Lynden, WA.
  • Μολὼν λαβέ
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2011, 09:19:12 PM »
Ballistically the 150 will prevail until it starts loosing velocity. The 130 flies flatter/faster and carries it'e energy a bit farther, and is nearly reveared as the perfect 270 bullet. But a 130gn bullet for tough Elk is a bit on the light side. So, for medium to smaller game go lighter than the 150, but for Elk and Bear the 150 should perform better in most instances. (I'm sure there are plenty of Elk taken with the 130 by experienced hunter/shootes though.)

-Steve
The NRA says I'm a Master!
Colt's, Ruger's, Dan Wesson, & Kimber are my friends!
Proud to be a U.S. Navy Veteran.

If you never follow your dreams, you'll never go anywhere.

Critical thinking keeps people from freaking the hell out every time some half baked blogger forgets his meds. Unlike some of you, I do not have TawkethOutOfAnus© syndrome.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21747
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2011, 09:28:00 PM »
A good 130 grain bullet will be more than adequate for anything up to and including elk.  People have been killing animals with 130 grains for many, many years and today's bullets are better than ever.  Find a good bullet that your guns likes and go hunting: 130, 140, or 150 will all work.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39198
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2011, 09:42:35 PM »
There's really not a whole lot of difference in performance from 130 to 150 grains. The lighter bullet will, of course, start out faster but they also lose their velocity faster. So in the end, the trajectories are virtually the same. Sure the higher muzzle velocity of the 130 gives it slightly less drop out at 400 yards, but it's only a few inches less than the 150 grain bullet. The 150 grain bullet will do better in the wind drift category, but again, it's only a few inches difference at 400 yards.

So, it's not so much the weight of the bullet that matters. It's more the construction of the bullet and how well it will stay together, or if long range performance matters to you, then you'll want a bullet with the highest ballistic coefficient available. If you want to use a good bullet that will work well for both deer and elk, try a 130 grain Barnes. I also think the Nosler Accubond is worth a try, and with that bullet I would consider going with at least the 140 grain weight, if not the 150.


Offline boots

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 339
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2011, 09:50:47 PM »
Ttry a 130 grain Barnes.

I am shooting these out of my 270 for deer. If i were targeting elk I would consider going with a 150gr but im not sure it would be absolutely necessary

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39198
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2011, 09:54:49 PM »
Ttry a 130 grain Barnes.

I am shooting these out of my 270 for deer. If i were targeting elk I would consider going with a 150gr but im not sure it would be absolutely necessary

I think with the Barnes the 130 is plenty good for elk because they retain 90% of their weight. A bullet such as the Accubond will only retain about 2/3 of its weight, so that's why I would tend to go with a heavier weight with the Accubond. Besides the 150 grain Accubond has a really high ballistic coefficient so it may start out a little slower but it will still be a very flat shooter.


Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21747
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2011, 09:55:33 PM »
There's really not a whole lot of difference in performance from 130 to 150 grains. The lighter bullet will, of course, start out faster but they also lose their velocity faster. So in the end, the trajectories are virtually the same.
That is true, but only if the ballistic coefficient of of the 150 grain is higher than the ballistic coefficient of a 130 grain bullet.

In general, heavier bullets have a higher ballistic coefficient than a lighter bullet of the same type.

However, if the ballistic coefficient of the 130 grain bullet is higher, it will start with a velocity advantage and gain a velocity advantage.

In the end, it makes little difference.  If hunters spent 1/100th of the time they spend talking about bullets on actual shooting practice, they'd be a lot more effective.  But what fun is that? :chuckle:
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39198
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #7 on: March 01, 2011, 10:13:34 PM »
There's really not a whole lot of difference in performance from 130 to 150 grains. The lighter bullet will, of course, start out faster but they also lose their velocity faster. So in the end, the trajectories are virtually the same.
That is true, but only if the ballistic coefficient of of the 150 grain is higher than the ballistic coefficient of a 130 grain bullet.

In general, heavier bullets have a higher ballistic coefficient than a lighter bullet of the same type.

However, if the ballistic coefficient of the 130 grain bullet is higher, it will start with a velocity advantage and gain a velocity advantage.

In the end, it makes little difference.  If hunters spent 1/100th of the time they spend talking about bullets on actual shooting practice, they'd be a lot more effective.  But what fun is that? :chuckle:


Yes, I was assuming the same bullet in differing weights. The heavier bullet always has a higher BC if that is the case. One thing I forgot to mention though is that the 130 does have another advantage in that it will recoil less than a 150.


Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21747
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #8 on: March 01, 2011, 10:15:17 PM »
My favorite 270 bullets are the 130 grain Barnes TSX and the 140 grain Nosler Accubond.  If your guns like either one of them, you're all set.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline jeepasaurusrex

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 4368
  • Location: Marysville, WA
  • Animal Population Control Specialist
    • https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000828401887
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #9 on: March 01, 2011, 10:33:51 PM »
We shoot 130gr Berger VLD pushed by 56gr of Hodgon 4831. Great accuracy and awesome knock down power.
Howa 1500 in .270 Winchester Shootin handloads.

"Vegetarian is an old Indian word for "Bad Hunter"


"If the women don't find you hansom, they should at least find you handy" -Red Green

Offline C-Money

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 10936
  • Location: Grant County
  • Self proclaimed 3pt master
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #10 on: March 02, 2011, 08:15:43 AM »
I have killed I think 7 deer with the 140gr Nosler accubond from a 270win. Great combo. I had a chance to kill an elk with this combo last year but let him walk.  I had just butchered a beef. I have all the confidence that the 140 accubond will work fine on elk.
I felt like a one legged cat trying to bury a terd on a frozen pond!

Offline KimberRich

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 1278
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #11 on: March 02, 2011, 11:52:47 AM »
We shoot 130gr Berger VLD pushed by 56gr of Hodgon 4831. Great accuracy and awesome knock down power.


Pretty close to what I shoot and it works great. 

130 Gr. Speer Grand Slam, 55 gr. of 4831.  Very accurate in my gun and has killed Deer, Elk, Goats, and many other things.. 

Offline C-Money

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 10936
  • Location: Grant County
  • Self proclaimed 3pt master
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #12 on: March 02, 2011, 01:08:23 PM »
I will need to check my book,  but I think I am loading 55gr of RL-19 with the 140 accubond. I worked up to this in the Nosler book.
I felt like a one legged cat trying to bury a terd on a frozen pond!

Offline toothfangclaw

  • newbe
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 1769
  • Location: Everett, WA
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #13 on: March 02, 2011, 09:27:27 PM »
Alright! looks like 130 it is! thanks gents! Now comes the fun of finding the bullets and etc.! I will check out all your recommendations too! Thanks!

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: 270 bullet weight
« Reply #14 on: March 03, 2011, 06:48:12 PM »
just pick one, any one that shoots well in your gun. the beauty of the 270win is all bullets made will perform well in its velocity window.....no need for fancy stuff, just plain ol' hot cor speers do amazingly well in this caliber. now were you to crank it up to wby speeds......

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Archery elk gear, 2025. by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 10:36:56 PM]


Herring anyone? by CastleRocker
[Yesterday at 09:42:53 PM]


Go kill some dogs! by fowl smacker
[Yesterday at 09:22:42 PM]


Leupold Display fade by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 08:17:29 PM]


38% increase in fishing and hunting licenses by bigtex
[Yesterday at 08:05:03 PM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by Buzzsaw461
[Yesterday at 07:52:24 PM]


E scouting for bears by Candcrods
[Yesterday at 07:32:06 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 07:22:02 PM]


Minimum post count needed to view classifieds by Hucci
[Yesterday at 06:43:35 PM]


Pocket Carry by Sakko300wsm
[Yesterday at 05:11:59 PM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Yesterday at 03:12:07 PM]


Encouraging on e side by hdshot
[Yesterday at 02:54:51 PM]


506 Willapa Hills Late Season Antlerless Tag by Fast Rider
[Yesterday at 12:48:55 PM]


Lund Fisherman 1800 info/advice by Stein
[Yesterday at 11:46:54 AM]


Knotty duck decoys by goosegunner
[Yesterday at 11:45:58 AM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by dwils233
[Yesterday at 11:36:36 AM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 09:21:15 AM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by geauxtigers
[Yesterday at 07:42:37 AM]


Any info on public land South Dakota pheasant hunts? by bornhunter
[Yesterday at 07:19:46 AM]


Can’t fish for pinks area 8-2? by blackpowderhunter
[Yesterday at 06:36:49 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal