Free: Contests & Raffles.
Ghost hunter, when you wake up and read this, please understand I'm not trying to bash you, I just don't think you've grasped the entire concept of all the math involved and the expense of shooting that far. There is only one way to shoot long distance. That one way is also the most expensive part of the entire equation. AMMO! And lots of it. TONS and TONS of it! Even if you handload it still won't be a good idea. Join a marksman club somewhere. I still talk to young joes in the army that think a sniper rifle is some gun with a massive scope on it. They can tell me the stats about every sniper system in call of duty, and when I start getting into the long range ballistics their go to response is to mumble something about the coriolis effect. Not a single one can tell me anything about moving turrets. They forget that bullets arc and they aren't laser beams.
Shooting a man sized target at 300 meters is enough of a b!tch for me to do consistantly, let alone something I may actually have a use for.
No confusion miles, I didn't say that I could even dream about making the long shots. That doesn't mean I don't try to be a better marksman. I don't school the younger guys, I just ask questions to make them wonder if it's as easy as a video game. I personally am still a better shot with iron sights than I am with a scope. I'm getting better though. Me not being able to physically do something well doesn't equate to me not understanding what is involved in doing it well.It took me 1500 rounds through my glock before I was good enough to hit a torso every time at 25 yards with only a second between each round in a magazine. I need more trigger time, and I'm finding out that that is the most expensive part of this whole process.
Is he talking about cleanly harvesting these animals " deer,elk,caribou,black bear,antelope,wolf,coyote,moose,sheep,goats" out to 800 yards ?
The reason there are so many Ruger upgrades is because they're necessary.