collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: tribal question  (Read 6212 times)

Offline heavy hauler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1366
  • Location: t90
tribal question
« on: January 10, 2012, 11:42:54 AM »
can members of tribes in washington kill wolves?
you cant eat the horns, but backstraps look like crap on my wall!!!!

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14537
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: tribal question
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2012, 11:45:49 AM »
I think they can, but only in the eastern 1/3 of the state--for now.

Offline Fowlweather25

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 1622
  • Location: Rochester, wa
Re: tribal question
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2012, 11:46:39 AM »
Probably :bash: actually I'm not sure :dunno:
What would life be without the thrill of the hunt?

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25032
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: tribal question
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2012, 12:09:10 PM »
NO... Tribes are only exempt from state laws not Federal laws. Other animals they cannot kill without the proper permit are sealions, cornmerants, and other federally protected animals.  :twocents:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline jackmaster

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 7011
  • Location: graham
Re: tribal question
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2012, 12:14:33 PM »
well i know that wolves meant alot to natives back in the day so they can probabl;y kill them for ceremonial reasons, well atleast i hope they can
my grandpa always said "if it aint broke dont fix it"

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25032
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: tribal question
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2012, 12:17:37 PM »
its actually been illegal to kill a wolf on the Quinault forever... somethimes they can get special use permits, however they still have to petition the feds.  :twocents:  Its not like thier ablity to hunt deer or elk...
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline FC

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3954
  • Location: Wa
Re: tribal question
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2012, 12:19:10 PM »
NO... Tribes are only exempt from state laws not Federal laws. Other animals they cannot kill without the proper permit are sealions, cornmerants, and other federally protected animals.  :twocents:

I watched a guy shoot sea lions next to the indian hatchery south of Hoodsport, if he had a permit it must have given pretty broad permission! The beach already had over a dozen dead sea lions on it and he was banging away at more that were out in the water from the beach with his 30-30.
The reason there are so many Ruger upgrades is because they're necessary.

Offline jackmaster

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 7011
  • Location: graham
Re: tribal question
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2012, 12:19:17 PM »
well i know this, the tribes might be are only way to keeping these damn wolves in check, i hope they petition the feds and are granted the rights to kill all they want  :twocents:
my grandpa always said "if it aint broke dont fix it"

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25032
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: tribal question
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2012, 12:22:46 PM »
Because of lax or difficult to enforce laws tribal members are much harder to enforce/convivt on game violations. Just because its been done doesn't mean its legal... I've heard of lots of people doing illegal stuff and not getting caught, however that does not mean they have carte blanche.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline sled

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 3559
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: tribal question
« Reply #9 on: January 10, 2012, 12:41:23 PM »
  This could get interesting.

Offline heavy hauler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1366
  • Location: t90
Re: tribal question
« Reply #10 on: January 10, 2012, 12:44:02 PM »
i dont think the wolves are federally protected. if they were , you couldnt hunt them in idaho
you cant eat the horns, but backstraps look like crap on my wall!!!!

Offline Huntboy

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 1740
  • Location: Spanaway, Wa
Re: tribal question
« Reply #11 on: January 10, 2012, 01:02:31 PM »
The wolves in Idaho have been turned over to the state for management. For the wolves in Wash. they have to meet their proposed plan before the Feds with
lift endangered status. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM.

Offline Fowlweather25

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 1622
  • Location: Rochester, wa
Re: tribal question
« Reply #12 on: January 10, 2012, 01:09:34 PM »
I thought they came off the endangered list in the eastern 3rd of the state?
What would life be without the thrill of the hunt?

Offline Pathfinder101

  • The Chosen YAR
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 11919
  • Location: Southeast WA
  • Semper Primus
Re: tribal question
« Reply #13 on: January 10, 2012, 01:24:27 PM »
I could be wrong here too, but I am pretty sure that the law passed on 10 May this year Federally delisted them.  That is what allows each state (notably Montana and Idaho-at this point) to formulate and implement it's "own" management plan.  If that is the case, then I would think that the tribes are OK to hunt wolves.   :dunno:
..again, I may be off-base here...
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.  That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50473
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: tribal question
« Reply #14 on: January 10, 2012, 01:30:01 PM »
NO....it is written DIRECTLY in their game laws, they cannot shoot wolves.   That is for Colville and for the Yakima confederated tribes.


That being said, I know the tribal guys will shoot on site with little fear of reprucussions.  (tribal guys I am referring too are Colville and have told me in person.) 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal