Free: Contests & Raffles.
With that said if there is a law against haveing a trail cam in NF useing 261.10 (e) wouldnt hold up as an argument in a court of law.
Quote from: christopheri on February 14, 2012, 10:43:47 AMWith that said if there is a law against haveing a trail cam in NF useing 261.10 (e) wouldnt hold up as an argument in a court of law. I don't think either of us have a high powered enough Law Degree to say that, do you councilor?
provivder you should be for all that is hunting related, the more we choose sides and dont stick together, the more the libs will take away till there is nothing left. just saying. Its not like the camera follows animals around then shoot them for you lol.
Quote from: CementFinisher on February 13, 2012, 09:00:11 PMprovivder you should be for all that is hunting related, the more we choose sides and dont stick together, the more the libs will take away till there is nothing left. just saying. Its not like the camera follows animals around then shoot them for you lol.It appears that provider isn't a hunter. I sent a PM requesting he address questions about his post and have received nothing. Any moderators on here? Maybe check into provider. Me thinks he's a plant.
Quote from: Elkaholic daWg on February 14, 2012, 09:10:31 AMQuote from: bigbucks1985 on February 13, 2012, 08:31:48 PMHad a gamie take down my game cams because he said they are not legal on nat. forest, anyone ever hear this?Quote from: Knocker of rocks on February 14, 2012, 08:49:40 AMI doubt that there is a blanket prohibition against trail cams per se'. What I think is being enforced is an individuals interpretation of abandoned property laws. Sounds like an agency LEO that needed to show you this law or statute, that if they could not should be cited for theft just like any of the rest of us would be. See 261.10(e). I believe, right or wrong, that the USFS could use this law to prohibit trail camshttp://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fsbdev3_054750.pdf
Quote from: bigbucks1985 on February 13, 2012, 08:31:48 PMHad a gamie take down my game cams because he said they are not legal on nat. forest, anyone ever hear this?Quote from: Knocker of rocks on February 14, 2012, 08:49:40 AMI doubt that there is a blanket prohibition against trail cams per se'. What I think is being enforced is an individuals interpretation of abandoned property laws. Sounds like an agency LEO that needed to show you this law or statute, that if they could not should be cited for theft just like any of the rest of us would be.
Had a gamie take down my game cams because he said they are not legal on nat. forest, anyone ever hear this?
I doubt that there is a blanket prohibition against trail cams per se'. What I think is being enforced is an individuals interpretation of abandoned property laws.
Quote from: Bob33 on February 13, 2012, 08:41:22 PMI think he had an agenda, or didn't like you. http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/specialuses/filming/This clearly states for commercial purposes. I wonder if all those DIY and other hunting shows get permits for filming?Maybe bait is considered a "prop"? If that was the case then it could very well be illegal according to this paragraph. Commercial photography is defined as the use of photographic equipment to capture still images on film, digital format, and other similar technologies found on National Forest System lands that: takes place at a location where members of the public are generally not allowed or where additional administrative costs are likely; or uses models, sets, or props that are not part of the site’s natural or cultural resources or administrative facilities (FSH 2709.11 2008-2 (CH 40)).Seems pretty petty though.
I think he had an agenda, or didn't like you. http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/specialuses/filming/
Quote from: pianoman9701 on February 14, 2012, 11:10:59 AMQuote from: CementFinisher on February 13, 2012, 09:00:11 PMprovivder you should be for all that is hunting related, the more we choose sides and dont stick together, the more the libs will take away till there is nothing left. just saying. Its not like the camera follows animals around then shoot them for you lol.It appears that provider isn't a hunter. I sent a PM requesting he address questions about his post and have received nothing. Any moderators on here? Maybe check into provider. Me thinks he's a plant.I looked at his posts, he seems to be a hunter to me. I guess he just hates trailcams for some reason.
FYI - Outfitters, guides, tv shows, or guys making cd's to sell, must all have Special-Use permits on USFS lands.
just want to follow
It is not illegal to leave trail cameras on public land (to include USFS, DFW, or DNR). Baiting for deer and elk is not illegal either. USFS can cite for state violations by using the federal venue as they have essentially incorporated our laws by reference (see 36 CFR 261.8a – State law violations occurring on Federal property……abbreviated title). Forest Service Law Enforcement Officers are also considered ex officio State Fish and Wildlife Officers and can address violations of state fish and wildlife regulations in a local venue. Generally, violations of state law are referred to our Officers. Hope this helps. – OG