Advertisement


Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Deer Hunting / Re: Crazy looking Deer
« Last post by teanawayslayer on Today at 11:20:59 AM »
Used to see quite a few with that coloring in Cle Elum. None of them had tails like that
2
Deer Hunting / Re: Crazy looking Deer
« Last post by Kingofthemountain83 on Today at 11:06:23 AM »
Yeah she is really short up front... Didn't really notice that at first look... There is a lot going on with her... Think it's a dwarf benchleg cause how bushy the tail is? BT do flag like a WT... Or farther east and a WT cross? I don't know what area you were in...
3
Scopes and Optics / Re: MOA or MRAD, & Why?
« Last post by Antlershed on Today at 10:49:02 AM »
The only “MRAD is easier” argument I’ve heard is that it’s easier to do calculations on the fly. I use a Sig 8k rangefinder that’s giving me my adjustments, so I’m not trying to solve complex math equations on the fly.  :chuckle: I’ve always shot MOA scopes, so that’s what I continue to use. It’s easy for me to see 4.86 MOA from the Sig and decide if I want to dial 4.75 or 5. 🤷🏻‍♂️
4
Scopes and Optics / Re: MOA or MRAD, & Why?
« Last post by pickardjw on Today at 10:47:08 AM »
I switched from MOA to MILS and have been liking it. Dialing 3.2 is harder to mess up than 14.25. And no one is shooting the difference in precision of 0.1 MIL adjustments vs 0.25 MOA adjustments so that isn't a factor.

I use wind brackets but don't use quick drop. Rifle is too fast for it and I'm getting a solution from my rangefinder anyway.

I was MIL curious but never fully grasped why others preferred it until I listened to this.

5
Scopes and Optics / Re: MOA or MRAD, & Why?
« Last post by jrebel on Today at 10:37:27 AM »
I’m a MOA guy and I have to many scopes to change at this point.  To me it is super easy, but that’s because that’s what I’ve learned in.   MRAD guys will tell the MRAD is the only way to go.  When I have ask them why????  It’s the same answer, because it’s easier??    :dunno: :dunno: :chuckle:

Pick your poison and learn it well….either will work. 
6
Elk Hunting / Re: Found after 2 days, meat worth anything?
« Last post by HntnFsh on Today at 10:22:49 AM »
I was trying like heck to be optimistic. Guess it didnt work. :(
7
Scopes and Optics / Re: MOA or MRAD, & Why?
« Last post by bowman on Today at 10:21:16 AM »
Mil is a lot easier for wind brackets and there is a pretty cool quick drop method with mils that works for a lot of cartridges to mid distances.
8
Taxidermy & Scoring / Re: Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors
« Last post by 253CritterGetter on Today at 10:14:43 AM »
I dropped off a bear on Nov 15 this year and picked up a euro mount. He apologized for the lack of communication and emphasized on how busy they are, he never mentioned anything about closing the business down.
As the post above says we have bigger issues with this flood now, all of our stuff might be completely ruined. Hopefully they had time to move everything to a safe location.
9
Scopes and Optics / Re: MOA or MRAD, & Why?
« Last post by HUNT JR on Today at 10:01:46 AM »
In my mind it really does not matter if you are using a rangefinder that provides ballistics. I use MOA and it works for me. I can convert the MOA numbers pretty quickly and have no issues.

I think Mil's is technically fewer "clicks" as .1 mil is .36 or whatever inches at 100 and most scopes are 1/4 moa so about .25 inches at 100 so when you dial out you spin the turret a little less.

I think you pick a system and learn it as they both can be effective.
10
Contests, Events, Organizations, Charity / Re: Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle
« Last post by pianoman9701 on Today at 09:18:38 AM »
I have to go get the tickets at the post. I'll be texting all of you with pictures. @HntnFsh - please PM me with your phone and full name.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal