collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: A bit of good news out of California  (Read 2159 times)

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 8823
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
A bit of good news out of California
« on: April 03, 2013, 08:47:29 PM »
http://www.vcstar.com/news/2013/apr/02/bill-to-protect-pets-from-traps-advances-but-ban/


Bill to protect pets from traps advances, but ban on bobcat trapping stalls



SACRAMENTO — A bill that seeks to reduce the unintended deaths of domestic pets in traps designed to catch and kill small wild animals received unanimous approval, but a more controversial measure to ban trapping bobcats in California stalled before an Assembly committee on Tuesday.

Without debate, the Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife committee gave bipartisan approval to a measure by Assemblyman Das Williams, D-Santa Barbara, that would limit the allowable size of so-called body-crushing traps used to kill animals such as skunks and raccoons that create nuisances in developed areas.

The bill, AB 789, would also require trappers to humanely kill animals that are injured when caught in conibear traps by prohibiting the use of chemicals other than those specifically designed for animal euthanasia. In addition, it requires the posting of signs notifying pet owners of the existence of traps in publicly accessible areas.

The panel, however, balked at taking up a measure to ban the trapping of bobcats, a practice that the bill’s supporters say has soared in recent years as the price of bobcat pelts on the international market has increased tenfold since 2009. AB 1213 by Assemblyman Richard Bloom, D-Santa Monica, was inspired by outrage in the communities surrounding Joshua Tree National Park, where an out-of-area trapper recently killed several bobcats on private land just outside the national park. Those bobcats had become such a fixture in the community that local residents had given some of them names.

The trapping of bobcats is permitted during hunting season, and last year trappers harvested about 1,500 of the predators in California — significantly more than the average take in recent years, but still well below the 6,000 to 7,000 that had been killed annually during the late 1970s and early ’80s.

Bloom argued that because no one knows how many of the secretive, difficult-to-count animals exist in the state it is impossible for state wildlife regulators to set a sustainable limit on how many can be killed.

UC Davis Ecology Professor Fraser Schilling testified that bobcats are, along with coyotes and mountain lions, one of only three remaining predators in the California wilds. Adult bobcats, which stand about 15 inches high, typically prey on rodents, rabbits, skunks, foxes and small deer.

“When you take away any predator, the ecosystem unravels,” he said.

Los Angeles furrier Michael Pappas said bobcat pelts are used to make luxury apparel that is sold largely in North America and Europe. The California harvest, he said, has been sustainable for decades. “There is no shortage of bobcats, I can assure you that,” he told the committee.

Lobbyist Gerald Upholt, representing the California Trappers Association, asserted there is “no science-based need” to enact a ban on bobcat trapping. “Anything that occurs relative to the regulation of trapping should be based on science,” he said.

Upholt and others in the industry urged lawmakers to defer to the state Fish and Game Commission to develop a bobcat management plan to determine what, if any, limits should be placed on the annual take.

Bloom asserted that while such a plan would be desirable, the cost of conducting a scientifically valid, region by region count of bobcats would be prohibitive.

“I don’t think anyone disputes that it would be nice to have more science,” he said. “The available evidence we have is that numbers of bobcats is decreasing, the take is increasing and the cost of pelts is going up.”

Committee members put the measure on hold, and several urged Bloom to meet with opponents and consider modifying the bill before bringing it back for a vote later this year.

Bruce Vandervort

Offline trapperguy22

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 421
  • Location: napavine wa.
Re: A bit of good news out of California
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2013, 10:49:28 PM »
that is some good news!!!

Offline NoImpactNoIdea

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 298
  • Location: King County
Re: A bit of good news out of California
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2013, 10:50:37 PM »
That is great news.  We all know how the California mindset tends to drift North.

Offline UrbanTrapper

  • Life Member: NRA, SCI, DSC, NTA, WSTA, ITA, ATA
  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 383
  • Location: Seattle or Kittitas County
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, WWC, HHC, NTA, WSTA
Re: A bit of good news out of California
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2013, 05:26:35 PM »
This is great news!

Funny that Bloom said the cost of conducting a bobcat population survey would be prohibitive.  That is only because they plan to use all the hunting and trapping license dollars to fund non-hunting related studies.  Publicize the list of the animals and plants they ARE studying and watch their embarrassment.  I bought three CA hunting licenses in 2011 so that my sons and I could hunt coyotes in the Palm Springs area while we were there for Thanksgiving with Grandpa.  I went into the local Fish and Wildlife office to get clarification on what BLM land was still huntable.  There were eight CADFW employees in there and none of them could answer my question because all of them were only working on endangered species, none on any GAME animals.  There weren't even any former Game Wardens or anyone who was knowledgeable on hunting issues.  They said there was NO Game Warden assigned to the whole Coachella Valley and they couldn't give me a phone number to ANY Game Warden at first.  When they got back to me with a phone number for a Game Warden, I called him, he laughed and said, "Is that the BEST they could do?  I'm not even in the desert. I'm in the San Fernando Valley."  Fish and Game Departments should be using Hunting, Trapping, and Fishing License revenues PRIMARLIY to study Game animals and Game Fish and furbearers.  Claiming you can't afford to conduct a needed study on a Game Animal or Furbearer when you are studying a whole heap of non-game animals is a ridiculous.  I had trouble finding a place to hunt coyotes because the BLM lands were all overlaid with preserves (BLM land is SUPPOSED to be 'multi-use').  One of them was the "Fringe-toed Lizard Preserve," I S@#$ you not! Ironic, because I would be willing to bet that one of the major causes of Fringe-toed Lizard mortality is coyotes.  Is our WDFW headed the way of the CADFW?
« Last Edit: April 05, 2013, 05:36:03 PM by WAUrbanTrapper »

Offline dbfalls

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 31
  • Location: Sumner Washington
Re: A bit of good news out of California
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2013, 05:47:11 PM »
 You know they are because it's not california fish and game it's fish and wildlife big difference. Becaue Fishand Game are interested in managing big game where the other is only interested in the politics. That why Idaho will never have washingtons problems with greenies.

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 8823
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: A bit of good news out of California
« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2013, 08:35:15 PM »
This is far from over. Take a look at what the other side is saying.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/120/894/366/ab-1213-the-bobcat-protection-act-update-action-needed/
Bruce Vandervort

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: A bit of good news out of California
« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2013, 08:49:27 PM »
Did you see 'where' a lot of their signers for that petition were from?  Looked like mostly outside the US.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal