collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: bullet performance discussions  (Read 9028 times)

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25038
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #15 on: October 24, 2016, 01:20:23 PM »
Cool post. I've been thinking about that round...
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline jay.sharkbait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 6507
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #16 on: October 24, 2016, 05:52:00 PM »
6.5 Carcano at 88 yards?

No one?

Nobody?

Geeze

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25038
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #17 on: October 24, 2016, 06:00:25 PM »
6.5 Carcano at 88 yards?

No one?

Nobody?

Geeze
I have no idea what that round is... what case is it based off?
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline jay.sharkbait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 6507
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #18 on: October 24, 2016, 06:25:40 PM »
6.5 Carcano at 88 yards?

No one?

Nobody?

Geeze
I have no idea what that round is... what case is it based off?

Old Italian military cartridge. Similar ballistics as the Grendel and similar terminal performance on 100-200 pound mammals.

Offline HawkCreek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 537
  • Location: Grant, Lincoln and Douglas
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #19 on: October 24, 2016, 06:28:47 PM »
It would be interesting to see more "tests" like this. Much more telling that ballistics gel and perfect conditions.



6.5 Carcano at 88 yards?

No one?

Nobody?

Geeze
I have no idea what that round is... what case is it based off?

He's referencing the rifle and distance of the JFK assassination...

Offline jay.sharkbait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 6507
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #20 on: October 24, 2016, 06:31:23 PM »
6.5 Carcano at 88 yards?

No one?

Nobody?

Geeze
I have no idea what that round is... what case is it based off?

He's referencing the rifle and distance of the JFK assassination...

Bingo. Actually the first shots were closer. The headshot was 88( maybe).

Offline yorketransport

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3310
  • Location: Yelm
  • Preferred pronouns: were/was
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #21 on: October 24, 2016, 09:24:07 PM »
6.5 Carcano at 88 yards?

No one?

Nobody?

Geeze
I have no idea what that round is... what case is it based off?

He's referencing the rifle and distance of the JFK assassination...

Bingo. Actually the first shots were closer. The headshot was 88( maybe).

Come on now, we all know it was one bullet fired from the Texas School book depository........ :stirthepot: :tinfoil:

I have the only documented case of a "magic bullet" here. :chuckle:

Offline jay.sharkbait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 6507
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #22 on: October 24, 2016, 09:35:59 PM »
6.5 Carcano at 88 yards?

No one?

Nobody?

Geeze
I have no idea what that round is... what case is it based off?

He's referencing the rifle and distance of the JFK assassination...

Bingo. Actually the first shots were closer. The headshot was 88( maybe).

Come on now, we all know it was one bullet fired from the Texas School book depository........ :stirthepot: :tinfoil:

I have the only documented case of a "magic bullet" here. :chuckle:

Uhhhhh, ok

Back and to the left

Offline jay.sharkbait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 6507
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #23 on: November 05, 2016, 07:39:58 PM »
6.5 Grendel

130 grain Accubond

Broke one rib near side one far side and destroyed heart.


Offline yorketransport

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3310
  • Location: Yelm
  • Preferred pronouns: were/was
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #24 on: November 05, 2016, 08:12:35 PM »
 Nice! How was the exit wound?

Offline jay.sharkbait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 6507
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #25 on: November 05, 2016, 08:30:54 PM »
Nice! How was the exit wound?

Good. It left a very short, but useable blood trail.

Heart definately wasn't working.

Offline 2labs

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 2299
  • Location: Graham
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #26 on: November 05, 2016, 08:31:59 PM »
Keep inventing the wheel?  6.5x55!
Dino was robbed
Habitual Rock Poacher
Do these "attack" pants make my ass look big?

Offline jay.sharkbait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 6507
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #27 on: November 05, 2016, 08:41:41 PM »
Keep inventing the wheel?  6.5x55!

Grendel allows you to use a much smaller platform.

Offline yorketransport

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3310
  • Location: Yelm
  • Preferred pronouns: were/was
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #28 on: November 06, 2016, 11:01:36 AM »
Keep inventing the wheel?  6.5x55!

Grendel allows you to use a much smaller platform.
:yeah:

The 6.5x55 is a very cool round, but it needs a medium-long action to function. The little Grendel works out of a mini action even smaller than a standard short action. The CZ 527 platform is built around 2.800" cartridges like the 223 and 7.62x39 so it's smaller in every dimension.

Offline 7mmstalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 128
  • Location: Anchorage Alaska-WA refugee from greedy politicians
Re: bullet performance discussions
« Reply #29 on: November 06, 2016, 12:14:58 PM »
My .02 worth...
Premium controlled expansion bullets are the magic to add versatility to  any cartridge. Medium sized can penetrate like an '06 or 270Win, 30-06 class will kill with authority of bigger magnums.
Excellent expansion and penetration .
Just returned from caribou hunting and used a 300 WSM with Accubond 165gr slugs. My son finished,after my less than perfect shot, with a 150gr X bullet out  a 7mm Rem mag.
 We didn't get to have our slugs to examine, both pass-throughs at 300 yards broadside. Although very little hydraulic damage usually found with high velocity.
 I used to complain about the cost of premium bullets, never again.

Not trying to hi-jack the the thread, the pics here  of Yorke's blacktail really show the beauty of a comfortable, accurate chambering at max potential from quality loads.
The popular european hunting loads bear this out, I am always reading that the 6.5 swede is a very common moose hunting round.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2016, 10:37:22 PM by 7mmstalker »
Hunting- 99% waiting walking listening and looking, 1% stalking and shooting.  Just do it!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 10:49:08 PM]


SE raffle tags holder by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 10:32:44 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 10:30:40 PM]


218 Chewuch Youth by NKAS
[Yesterday at 09:23:30 PM]


Looking for people to hunt with. by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 08:17:06 PM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by MikeC
[Yesterday at 06:53:45 PM]


2025-2026 Regs by CP
[Yesterday at 06:08:19 PM]


The Official: Hunting-Washington.Com Recipe Book by Brushcrawler
[Yesterday at 04:40:46 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by HighlandLofts
[Yesterday at 04:05:00 PM]


506 Willapa Hills Late Season Antlerless Tag by Tinmaniac
[Yesterday at 02:54:55 PM]


My Brothers First Blacktail by 3nails
[Yesterday at 02:22:32 PM]


Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 12:30:04 PM]


DR Brush Mower won't crank by jackelope
[Yesterday at 11:12:40 AM]


Tooth age on Quinault bull by jeffitz
[Yesterday at 10:16:48 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 09:50:13 AM]


Wyoming Antelope Unit 80 by tntklundt
[Yesterday at 07:51:23 AM]


Stillaguamish 448 QD rifle tag by Turner89
[Yesterday at 07:32:13 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal