collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Oregon spray deal  (Read 1500 times)

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1132
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Oregon spray deal
« on: February 21, 2020, 10:32:43 AM »

Offline bbarnes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 478
  • Location: Mt Saint Helens
    • Mt Saint Helens Rescue .com
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2020, 10:56:04 AM »
Great news now let's get washinton to do the same HOOF ROT .

Offline 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 4373
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2020, 11:27:08 AM »
Every little bit helps, but it's not saying they won't spray, just where they will spray and how much notice is given. Good first step. Bring back slash burning, better for everything.
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline WSU

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 4936
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2020, 11:30:38 AM »
I don't understand the statements to bring back slash burning.  That still goes on and doesn't do the same thing as spraying.  Am I missing something?

Offline elkboy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1179
  • Location: Whitman County
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2020, 11:45:10 AM »
Every little bit helps, but it's not saying they won't spray, just where they will spray and how much notice is given. Good first step. Bring back slash burning, better for everything.

Fire can be very good for deer and elk forage! Fireweed, buckbrush (ceanothus), deervetch, and so much more. We have to ease up a little on smoke restrictions so more ground can be burned under good conditions.

Offline romaknows

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 344
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2020, 11:49:36 AM »
I don't understand the statements to bring back slash burning.  That still goes on and doesn't do the same thing as spraying.  Am I missing something?
[/
quote]

Purely just my observation, but hunting spayed units verses cleaned and burned units are night and day different when it comes to deer and elk numbers.
I also can hardly navigate a sprayed unit with 3 feet of limbs on the ground,makes me wonder if the animals have a tough time ......
high country rules!

Offline 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 4373
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2020, 11:59:26 AM »
All of that. Burning is a natural part of the landscape. Has been for millions of years. Our ecosystem is based on burning and regeneration. Many tree and plant species can't germinate new seeds without fire. When you burn slash and use fire to clean cuts, you clean up the junk that just rots, and actually put those nutrients back into the soil. The next group of seedlings have great soil to start in. And as others have said, the other foliage that comes back are deer/elk magnets. Those cuts are highly productive areas. Sprayed cuts are not.

You are right in the context that it doesn't do the same thing as spraying. Spraying reduces the foliage load in the cuts so that the seedlings can get a better shot at growing for the first year or two without being choked out. Somehow though, cuts were replanted successfully for a hundred years before herbicides became mainstream.
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline Mudman

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 5994
  • Location: Wetside rock garden.
  • Get R Done.
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2020, 11:59:54 AM »
Not good enough.  Full ban.  Burn only.
MAGA!  Again..

Offline cougforester

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 864
  • Location: Spokane
  • Groups: DU, RMEF
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2020, 12:47:10 PM »
Burning harvest units post logging would be great in a perfect world.

However, try doing widespread burns on all even aged harvests in todayís political and social climate with smoke management policies, liability and insurance issues, cost.... good luck. Todayís forest practice rules also require larger riparian buffers than they did a century ago (meaning any), all of which would need fire lines installed around them. The logistics donít work.

Iíd rather have some early seral habitat that gets sprayed at first than thousands of acres of late seral, closed canopy Forest Service habitat with no habitat or wildlife value at all.

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 3364
  • Location: PREDATOR PIT UNIT 121
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #9 on: February 21, 2020, 01:55:35 PM »
Call it what you want for what ever reasons.....its about increased yield that translates to increased profit.

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • Best Biggie Blogger
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 12312
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • DAN-O CAN'T TAKE BIGGIE PICS
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #10 on: February 21, 2020, 02:33:36 PM »
Burning harvest units post logging would be great in a perfect world.

However, try doing widespread burns on all even aged harvests in todayís political and social climate with smoke management policies, liability and insurance issues, cost.... good luck. Todayís forest practice rules also require larger riparian buffers than they did a century ago (meaning any), all of which would need fire lines installed around them. The logistics donít work.

Iíd rather have some early seral habitat that gets sprayed at first than thousands of acres of late seral, closed canopy Forest Service habitat with no habitat or wildlife value at all.

Unit burns had fire lines on them when they used to burn them, just put the fire lines back from the riparian areas.😉

Not rocket science.🤣

Burning is way better than spraying, I wouldnít doubt the chemical companies are the ones pushing burn bans. :twocents:
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc On!

Offline Mudman

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 5994
  • Location: Wetside rock garden.
  • Get R Done.
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #11 on: February 21, 2020, 04:37:12 PM »
This "spraying" is HUGE $$$ to Co.'s.   I understand the results produced in terms of yield/$ but it is very bad.   Gov Inslee( :bash:) is considering tearing down damns to help salmon to help Orcas yet Damns weren't the issue for decades until the 90's???   OR maybe all the chemicals in water could be a problem?  Is it coincidence that so many problems started at same time as this practice did?   How many are related?   Nobody seems to listen to "other" science unless it is paid for by corrupt Co profiting form it. :twocents:
MAGA!  Again..

Offline Buckhunter24

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 1327
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #12 on: February 21, 2020, 04:57:06 PM »
With no slash compliance like idaho theres no financial motivation. And like others have said, the smoke restrictions make burning damn near impossible depending on location. If they only let you get 100 tons at a time you might make 6 or 8 trips out just to do landing piles.

Theres some smaller timber companies successfuly using uneven age management, but even age is the go to for the larger reits and chemicals improve your seedling survival and rotation time. I would love to see broadcast burning come back but Im afraid it wont happen.

And yes putting a fireline along an rmz is great on operable ground but on a line strip you generally cant sidehill so you end up doing it by hand which is even more expensive and less reliable.

Offline konradcountry

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 762
  • Location: SouthWest
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #13 on: February 21, 2020, 06:08:04 PM »
The problem I have is that they can spray anything from the air.

Limit them to spraying 24d and Glyphosate on the ground. Would also be a job booster.

Offline Buckhunter24

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 1327
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #14 on: February 21, 2020, 06:20:28 PM »
Direct exposure is a lot lower aerial spray. Backpack spraying is an unpleasent job to put it mildly.

I am not a proponent of chemicals by any means but those pilots are really good in my experience.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

GFWs Western Bobcat marketing Program by Humptulips
[Today at 08:23:26 PM]


Looking to Rent/Borrow Canvas/Wall Tent by Wolf in the Mountains
[Today at 08:22:48 PM]


Alkali Muzzy Starting Tomorrow by Birdguy
[Today at 08:22:45 PM]


Primos Blind by SeatoSummit88
[Today at 08:22:14 PM]


WTS - MISC FIRSTLITE, STONE GLACIER, EDDIE BAUER GUIDE by Tjbarker
[Today at 08:21:48 PM]


Bullet Starter Advice by BigGoonTuna
[Today at 08:13:28 PM]


Called in a good one today. by WapitiTalk1
[Today at 08:10:24 PM]


WTB Left hand 12g Semi Auto by ridgefire
[Today at 07:57:36 PM]


NW Sportsman: Washington 2020 Buck Prospects by hunter100
[Today at 07:37:19 PM]


Looking at Work/Cargo Vans, by Lucky1
[Today at 06:53:01 PM]


Porcupines by Tiger1358
[Today at 06:40:37 PM]


Calling Cougars? by jasnt
[Today at 06:38:24 PM]


Cleaning out the closet, Reloading and Misc. For Sale by Rem14
[Today at 06:11:20 PM]


Strawberries as Cam Bait by h20hunter
[Today at 06:08:18 PM]


WTS PRIMERS by wapiti22
[Today at 05:47:39 PM]


Thompson Center Triumph??? by jrebel
[Today at 05:43:12 PM]


Wts- Youth Sitka by buckhunter
[Today at 05:19:49 PM]


Strange looking deer.... by WapitiTalk1
[Today at 05:19:47 PM]


Walkie talkie recommendations by vandeman17
[Today at 05:13:34 PM]


Stone Glacier De Havilland Pants by grimace
[Today at 05:08:55 PM]