Free: Contests & Raffles.
Hey guys and gals. I just joined the forum last week. Mostly just lurking and reading. You guys make some real good points. Saw this topic and just had to chime in. I fall into the group of old guys who wish they could still see the iron sights on their rifles. Accuracy has suffered horribly in the last 10 years. I would welcome the opportunity to put some sights on my Big Horn that would give me a better sight picture. I don't think it is the sights on a muzzy that attracts hunters to the season or distracts them from it. It's all about pouring powder and stuffing a bullet down the barrel. Peep sight, open sight, plain sight or 1x scope sight, is not what the muzzy is about. Pour the powder, keep it dry and then you get ONE shot. Modern hunters are not going to flock to the muzzy season because of a sight change. I am sure there will be less wounded animals with that ONE shot too. The funny part of all of this is nobody makes a 1x scope anymore. They have all been discontinued. Weaver, TC and Nikon all made one at one time. If WDFW approves this come March, the price of used 1x scopes will go up nicely if you have one.
I'm assuming Alot of muzzleloader scopes have drop reticle in them .So it's not just advantage of seeing better.But also shooting further. C'mon don't lie now ,it's not all about seeing better.
Ok, no scope for deer and elk. Let's have a year round season for bears and cougars with non-illuminated scopes on muzzleloaders. After a few years they can evaluate how much more lethal the scope is.
Quote from: Dan-o on January 01, 2021, 09:38:40 PMQuote from: nwhunter on January 01, 2021, 09:28:50 PMI used to argue against scopes on muzzies until I hit my mid 40's and eyes started going bad. Now open sights or a peep is blurry and with my readers on I can't see the target so I understand the reasoning behind it. I don't think it will suddenly get guys shooting 200 yards with them but it may keep some of the older guys in the game..That. So what I read is you want to hunt modern , with a modern rifle because of your eyesight ? And I can shoot 200 with my knight ultralight in a very decent group all day a scope would make it that much easier and yes it would make people flock to muzzleloding because we know we really do get the best seasons
Quote from: nwhunter on January 01, 2021, 09:28:50 PMI used to argue against scopes on muzzies until I hit my mid 40's and eyes started going bad. Now open sights or a peep is blurry and with my readers on I can't see the target so I understand the reasoning behind it. I don't think it will suddenly get guys shooting 200 yards with them but it may keep some of the older guys in the game..That.
I used to argue against scopes on muzzies until I hit my mid 40's and eyes started going bad. Now open sights or a peep is blurry and with my readers on I can't see the target so I understand the reasoning behind it. I don't think it will suddenly get guys shooting 200 yards with them but it may keep some of the older guys in the game..
Quote from: Cougartail on January 02, 2021, 08:14:34 AMOk, no scope for deer and elk. Let's have a year round season for bears and cougars with non-illuminated scopes on muzzleloaders. After a few years they can evaluate how much more lethal the scope is. Open spring bear with muzzy and scope? That would be awesome and super productive. Clearly more productive then the no year around season we have now..
Quote from: hunter399 on January 02, 2021, 07:32:25 AMI'm assuming Alot of muzzleloader scopes have drop reticle in them .So it's not just advantage of seeing better.But also shooting further. C'mon don't lie now ,it's not all about seeing better.Exactly
Quote from: millerwheeler on January 02, 2021, 07:34:34 AMQuote from: hunter399 on January 02, 2021, 07:32:25 AMI'm assuming Alot of muzzleloader scopes have drop reticle in them .So it's not just advantage of seeing better.But also shooting further. C'mon don't lie now ,it's not all about seeing better.ExactlyDo either of you know of a single 1X scope with a drop reticle, or are you just "assuming'?