collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Another to shoot or not to shoot  (Read 1547 times)

Offline Bullkllr

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 4286
  • Location: Graham
Re: Another to shoot or not to shoot
« Reply #15 on: September 24, 2022, 08:58:29 AM »
40 yards? Nahh.
"WE THE PEOPLE..."

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 47788
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Another to shoot or not to shoot
« Reply #16 on: September 24, 2022, 09:09:04 AM »
Honesty is awesome PD and the willingness to talk about it.   

If I shot every bear that ever popped its jaws at me, YIKES   I think it was duckmen up above that made the comment, its a way of communication.   A doe or a cow stamping her foot etc.  Any animal can hand it to you at any time.     Its a mother defending her cubs, I doubt she wants to cuddle.   At least she is communicating.     

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 2711
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Another to shoot or not to shoot
« Reply #17 on: September 24, 2022, 11:15:45 AM »
Curious why your first two (only two) post are ethical shoot / no shoot scenarios about bear.  Are you trying to get hunters to admit or say they would shoot a sow with cubs.....or in the first scenario shoot a bear without observing long enough to see if their were cubs with that bear? 

I don't know a hunter that would shoot a sow knowing it had a cub.  I have property hat has an overabundance of bears that I would love to have gone....and I still won't shoot the sows with cubs.  Our state is jacked up in the fact that our spring bear season has been taken away, we can't bait and we can't run dogs.  Bears become opportunistic kills for most hunters and even then...most hunters pass on sows with known cubs.  If our state wanted to insure sows with cubs were not targeted, they would allow baiting / running dogs.  The fact that they don't, the sows that are shot with cubs (my guess anyway) is due to the opportunistic hunter shooting a bear that presents a very small window of opportunity. 

Now the talk of taking away trail cameras.....which would add that much more complexity to some bear hunters.  I know which sows have cubs long before hunting season.  We know if we see said bears (regardless of cubs being present) to not shoot.  Eliminate trail cameras and even more sows will get shot that have cubs. 

Sorry for the rant......you may be legit.....but your only two post make me suspicious of your intent.  I hope it is...what it is....and you are just trying to learn, thus inquiring about instances you have experienced this year.   Hunters already don't trust our Commissioners, WDFW officers, Governor, etc.....if your fishing for anything else.... :bash: :bash:
:yeah:
This is a great post jrebel. We have to be careful especially on the internet and communicate our reality and ethics. I had nearly an identical reaction when I read this. I didn't look at your post as a rant but rather a word of caution that is appreciated.  I do appreciate ingrained outdoors sharing an experience but the shoot out no shoot scenarios seemed odd to say the least. I have had dozens of similar scenarios where shooting has not only not happened it has not been considered including several false charges. Thank you for your thoughtful post jrebel and thank you for the clarification ingrained outdoors both are valuable IMHO.

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 39101
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • Apply for a loan
Re: Another to shoot or not to shoot
« Reply #18 on: September 24, 2022, 11:32:22 AM »
To the OP: Good post and good, ethical decision not to shoot. If there's anything to karma, you've got a nice boar in your future.  :tup:
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Can you hunt with a loaded gun while riding a horse? by KFhunter
[Today at 03:34:31 PM]


Legal/ethical opinion by Goshawk
[Today at 03:31:09 PM]


What's a nice whitetail like you doing here? by BR549
[Today at 03:26:40 PM]


This forum could use an upgrade .... by bearpaw
[Today at 03:20:35 PM]


Who reports to the game commission by nwwanderer
[Today at 03:20:24 PM]


Pay it Forward by Wild Bill
[Today at 02:57:03 PM]


Drew Chiwawa late tag by WildBear
[Today at 02:42:16 PM]


WTS Snowmobile Gear by huntandjeep
[Today at 02:11:07 PM]


Chiliwist Late Archery by WildBear
[Today at 02:04:11 PM]


Summer Sausage - Step by step by cooltimber
[Today at 01:57:55 PM]


Waterfowl Gear Sale! by DuckSlapper
[Today at 01:26:44 PM]


Mcnary Duck Hunting by DuckSlapper
[Today at 01:24:17 PM]


Garage Clean out by twolabs
[Today at 01:17:26 PM]


Daughter got it done in Montana this week by blackveltbowhunter
[Today at 12:44:01 PM]


Montana bound 11/18. (Deer Down) by bearhunter99
[Today at 12:28:56 PM]


A FEW NICE POKES WITH MY .223 by Thermal Predator Control
[Today at 12:11:07 PM]


My Grandpa’s 1938 Bench Leg Buck by pianoman9701
[Today at 11:59:17 AM]


WTS Tikka Roughtech by tgray
[Today at 11:05:48 AM]


North Cascades Grizzly Reintroduction by Fidelk
[Today at 09:35:07 AM]


Wolf? by Slenk
[Today at 08:52:58 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2022, SimplePortal