collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Could be very bad for freedom?  (Read 7060 times)

Offline hdshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 814
  • Location: e wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #30 on: February 15, 2024, 06:33:39 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html
Don't read my post if facts hurt your feeling.

Offline ghosthunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 7481
  • Location: Mount Vernon WA
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #31 on: February 15, 2024, 09:42:22 PM »
Saw coverage tonight. Crime up 166% there. Huge gang problem. One of the firearms a long gun.

Had increasing crime past four years.
GHOST CAMP "We Came To Hunt"
Proud Parent of A United States Marine

We are all traveling from Birth to the Packing House. ( Broken Trail)

“I f he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.” ― Theodore Roosevelt

Online jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11221
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #32 on: February 15, 2024, 10:49:46 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability. 


Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32835
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #33 on: February 15, 2024, 10:56:26 PM »
 Amazing that parents can be held accountable for something like this, yet have zero say so when the schools teach their kids to have sex change procedures! :rolleyes:

 I wonder which political side is supportive of these measures!!! :rolleyes:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline metlhead

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 1572
  • Location: sw wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #34 on: February 16, 2024, 07:35:07 AM »
Nothing will change because of the shooting at thr Taylor Swift parade. Lots of finger pointing and blame directed towards anything with deep pockets then it'll be forgotten. Fortunately it'll be that much closer to waterfowl season and we can be happy smily again.

Online trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19181
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #35 on: February 16, 2024, 07:55:43 AM »
Amazing that parents can be held accountable for something like this, yet have zero say so when the schools teach their kids to have sex change procedures! :rolleyes:

 I wonder which political side is supportive of these measures!!! :rolleyes:
at this point, is there ANYTHING the dems do that is positive? So tired of them.
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline hdshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 814
  • Location: e wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #36 on: February 16, 2024, 04:11:15 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability.

If the parents had absolutely no involvement in the shooting even if the parents legally bought the guns you better hope the parents won’t be liable in any way because law abiding parents might never buy their kids a gun to hunt with again or even for themselves.  Only those responsible for their crime are responsible.  Laws could include everyone, even good people with no talking out both sides of your mouth.
Don't read my post if facts hurt your feeling.

Online jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11221
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #37 on: February 16, 2024, 07:09:02 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability.

If the parents had absolutely no involvement in the shooting even if the parents legally bought the guns you better hope the parents won’t be liable in any way because law abiding parents might never buy their kids a gun to hunt with again or even for themselves.  Only those responsible for their crime are responsible.  Laws could include everyone, even good people with no talking out both sides of your mouth.

That’s a very ignorant post.   I’m all for debates and discussion, but when you accuse people of talking out of both sides of their mouth…..I’ll bow out.   I could give you examples of where your wrong….but that wouldn’t help.   Good luck to you!! 

Offline hdshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 814
  • Location: e wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #38 on: February 20, 2024, 06:01:35 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability.

If the parents had absolutely no involvement in the shooting even if the parents legally bought the guns you better hope the parents won’t be liable in any way because law abiding parents might never buy their kids a gun to hunt with again or even for themselves.  Only those responsible for their crime are responsible.  Laws could include everyone, even good people with no talking out both sides of your mouth.

That’s a very ignorant post.   I’m all for debates and discussion, but when you accuse people of talking out of both sides of their mouth…..I’ll bow out.   I could give you examples of where your wrong….but that wouldn’t help.   Good luck to you!!

It is because you have no examples and never accused anybody of talking out both sides of their mouth but explained in clear English the law could not allow talking out both sides of your mouth. 
Don't read my post if facts hurt your feeling.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32835
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #39 on: February 21, 2024, 11:25:47 PM »
Amazing that parents can be held accountable for something like this, yet have zero say so when the schools teach their kids to have sex change procedures! :rolleyes:

 I wonder which political side is supportive of these measures!!! :rolleyes:

 Brought to you by the democrat party and their voters!
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline hdshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 814
  • Location: e wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #40 on: March 06, 2024, 04:07:47 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability.

If the parents had absolutely no involvement in the shooting even if the parents legally bought the guns you better hope the parents won’t be liable in any way because law abiding parents might never buy their kids a gun to hunt with again or even for themselves.  Only those responsible for their crime are responsible.  Laws could include everyone, even good people with no talking out both sides of your mouth.

That’s a very ignorant post.   I’m all for debates and discussion, but when you accuse people of talking out of both sides of their mouth…..I’ll bow out.   I could give you examples of where your wrong….but that wouldn’t help.   Good luck to you!!

Thumbing through here and you did give an example of what a blanket statement is like what my former hunting partner does to others.  Mainly gave time to digest and notice the words everyone and people, unless not human the words everyone and people includes myself.  Keep making those statements turning away with no conscience. 
Don't read my post if facts hurt your feeling.

Offline Platensek-po

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 1464
  • Location: Shelton, wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #41 on: March 06, 2024, 06:37:01 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability.

If the parents had absolutely no involvement in the shooting even if the parents legally bought the guns you better hope the parents won’t be liable in any way because law abiding parents might never buy their kids a gun to hunt with again or even for themselves.  Only those responsible for their crime are responsible.  Laws could include everyone, even good people with no talking out both sides of your mouth.

That’s a very ignorant post.   I’m all for debates and discussion, but when you accuse people of talking out of both sides of their mouth…..I’ll bow out.   I could give you examples of where your wrong….but that wouldn’t help.   Good luck to you!!

It is because you have no examples and never accused anybody of talking out both sides of their mouth but explained in clear English the law could not allow talking out both sides of your mouth.

In clear English???  :dunno:
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”

If you are not willing to die for freedom then take the word out of your vocabulary.

Online trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19181
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #42 on: March 07, 2024, 06:48:37 AM »
Not going to read this entire thread but, didn't the dad follow the law when it came to that states rules on gun storage?  And he separated the ammo, sounded like he tried?  And the argument is he should have done more?  If that's the case, and some of you want him to go to jail, wow.  I know good friends with kids that went through some bad years, hell, I thought he would shoot up a school some day.  Should I go to jail if he did?  Blaming parents for being bad parents is fine, there are a lot of bad parents out there. But putting them in jail for it, man that's a slope I don't want to be judged on.  I also wonder if this lady that was found guilty was black, would she had even ended up in court?  No way!
« Last Edit: March 07, 2024, 06:54:07 AM by trophyhunt »
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline hdshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 814
  • Location: e wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #43 on: March 07, 2024, 05:27:17 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability.

If the parents had absolutely no involvement in the shooting even if the parents legally bought the guns you better hope the parents won’t be liable in any way because law abiding parents might never buy their kids a gun to hunt with again or even for themselves.  Only those responsible for their crime are responsible.  Laws could include everyone, even good people with no talking out both sides of your mouth.

That’s a very ignorant post.   I’m all for debates and discussion, but when you accuse people of talking out of both sides of their mouth…..I’ll bow out.   I could give you examples of where your wrong….but that wouldn’t help.   Good luck to you!!

It is because you have no examples and never accused anybody of talking out both sides of their mouth but explained in clear English the law could not allow talking out both sides of your mouth.

In clear English???  :dunno:

Lol you found the joke similar dumb and dumber talking to each other.
Don't read my post if facts hurt your feeling.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho Non-Res Tag Advisory Group by Feathernfurr
[Today at 11:56:10 AM]


WDFW Land, No Decoys? by BD1
[Today at 11:30:57 AM]


Load development in cold weather question by JohnVH
[Today at 11:13:28 AM]


Oppose HB1504 by Dick in the Dirt
[Today at 11:03:28 AM]


Savage Model 110 338 Lapua Magnum with Vortex Razor Gen 2 by jrebel
[Today at 10:59:27 AM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by dvolmer
[Today at 10:46:26 AM]


Lil’ Titans youth hunt ram mounts by BlackRiverTaxidermy
[Today at 10:46:07 AM]


Silicon spray question by FWilliams
[Today at 09:28:20 AM]


Do cell cameras get stolen less? by trophyhunt
[Today at 09:26:24 AM]


Coyote #11 in a cage by redi
[Today at 09:17:08 AM]


Tikka T3X Lite Veil Wideland by Sscleo
[Today at 08:34:14 AM]


Pickled Brussel sprouts by Smokepole
[Today at 08:22:34 AM]


S&W 66 by 30.06
[Yesterday at 10:39:44 PM]


Moose Paddle by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 10:33:31 PM]


Western Washington Rabbit. by Danielaw
[Yesterday at 08:56:18 PM]


Any place to hunt squirrels??? by Danielaw
[Yesterday at 08:35:49 PM]


Anyone Reload for the 30-30 Win? by HighlandLofts
[Yesterday at 08:10:41 PM]


Walleye migration? by Jonathan_S
[Yesterday at 07:20:26 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal