collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Interstate hunting regulations???  (Read 1793 times)

Online CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7247
  • Location: Mukilteo
Interstate hunting regulations???
« on: July 31, 2012, 07:05:50 AM »
Say I take a road trip to North Dakota and shoot my possession limit of pheasants there.  Can I stop in Montana and hunt there if I still have the ND pheasants?  How about WA?

Anyone ever make such as trip?


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25063
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 07:26:11 AM »
Thats a good question that i'd like to know the answer to as well... I would guess that since you have Lic for both and as long as your Phesants from ND are processed then you would be ok.  :dunno:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21866
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 07:11:45 PM »
That is an interesting question.  I will do some research. My initial thought: for big game such as deer there is no "possession limit": if you can legally kill a deer in 10 states, you could legally possess 10 deer.  For waterfowl which is federally managed, most interpretations would conclude that one "aggregate possession limit" does indeed add all U.S. kills together.  See page 6: http://www.fws.gov/le/pdffiles/50_CFR_20.pdf

Upland birds are probably more like big game, in that each state's limit would not be counted toward another state's possession limit.  This assumes, of course, that it could be clearly demonstated from which state the species in one's possession were legally killed.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Shotgun Sight help by wadu1
[Today at 04:58:58 PM]


"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by Dark2Dark
[Today at 04:52:05 PM]


Reinforcing stock for bipod by 7mmfan
[Today at 03:36:10 PM]


Crazy looking Deer by Fletch
[Today at 02:18:02 PM]


Seekins SALE by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 01:42:40 PM]


Big J's Barn sale / Drawing by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 01:37:21 PM]


Smelt ? by AL WORRELLS KID
[Today at 01:22:16 PM]


MOA or MRAD, & Why? by Antlershed
[Today at 10:49:02 AM]


Found after 2 days, meat worth anything? by HntnFsh
[Today at 10:22:49 AM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by 253CritterGetter
[Today at 10:14:43 AM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by pianoman9701
[Today at 09:18:38 AM]


Is it a conflict of interest by pianoman9701
[Today at 08:55:13 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by bearpaw
[Today at 08:37:03 AM]


4 days left by dreadi
[Yesterday at 11:05:45 PM]


Update repair complete Who knows Stihl messed up and cooked my 044 by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 08:54:03 PM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 07:37:34 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by Turner89
[Yesterday at 07:18:14 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by BlackBellyHumpBack
[Yesterday at 06:34:30 PM]


Tease 'l' by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 06:20:29 PM]


Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 05:59:34 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal