collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Interstate hunting regulations???  (Read 1776 times)

Online CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7211
  • Location: Mukilteo
Interstate hunting regulations???
« on: July 31, 2012, 07:05:50 AM »
Say I take a road trip to North Dakota and shoot my possession limit of pheasants there.  Can I stop in Montana and hunt there if I still have the ND pheasants?  How about WA?

Anyone ever make such as trip?


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25062
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 07:26:11 AM »
Thats a good question that i'd like to know the answer to as well... I would guess that since you have Lic for both and as long as your Phesants from ND are processed then you would be ok.  :dunno:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21839
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 07:11:45 PM »
That is an interesting question.  I will do some research. My initial thought: for big game such as deer there is no "possession limit": if you can legally kill a deer in 10 states, you could legally possess 10 deer.  For waterfowl which is federally managed, most interpretations would conclude that one "aggregate possession limit" does indeed add all U.S. kills together.  See page 6: http://www.fws.gov/le/pdffiles/50_CFR_20.pdf

Upland birds are probably more like big game, in that each state's limit would not be counted toward another state's possession limit.  This assumes, of course, that it could be clearly demonstated from which state the species in one's possession were legally killed.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

King of the mountain caught sleeping by bigmacc
[Today at 02:13:50 PM]


Anti-fog for glass by wadu1
[Today at 02:09:42 PM]


Colville lodging, any recommendations? by C-Money
[Today at 02:04:53 PM]


It was a great year by bigmacc
[Today at 02:04:19 PM]


F150 Ecoboost Guys by dog
[Today at 01:34:00 PM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by bearpaw
[Today at 01:19:15 PM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by HntnFsh
[Today at 12:52:08 PM]


Sturgeon Set-ups by supagoose
[Today at 12:04:30 PM]


GMU 335/334 cow tag help by firefowl
[Today at 11:59:50 AM]


Another Mushroom we need ID on by Trapper John
[Today at 11:58:37 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by highside74
[Today at 11:54:54 AM]


Blood trailing in the rain by Dark2Dark
[Today at 11:30:30 AM]


Harlequin in weird places? by hunterednate
[Today at 11:03:47 AM]


NAVY BEAN SOUP by Oldguy
[Today at 09:31:54 AM]


The 33 year quest by HikerHunter
[Today at 08:25:05 AM]


Getting the hang of hanging on to mallards! by Goshawk
[Today at 07:58:06 AM]


A great stormy weekend for bucks, now don't forget to... by Goshawk
[Today at 07:56:19 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by 300rum
[Today at 07:23:58 AM]


Letter of Complaint to WDFW/CWD by HereDuckyDucky
[Today at 07:13:21 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by JDArms1240
[Today at 07:02:38 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal