collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Interstate hunting regulations???  (Read 1695 times)

Online CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7099
  • Location: Mukilteo
Interstate hunting regulations???
« on: July 31, 2012, 07:05:50 AM »
Say I take a road trip to North Dakota and shoot my possession limit of pheasants there.  Can I stop in Montana and hunt there if I still have the ND pheasants?  How about WA?

Anyone ever make such as trip?


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25048
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 07:26:11 AM »
Thats a good question that i'd like to know the answer to as well... I would guess that since you have Lic for both and as long as your Phesants from ND are processed then you would be ok.  :dunno:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21770
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 07:11:45 PM »
That is an interesting question.  I will do some research. My initial thought: for big game such as deer there is no "possession limit": if you can legally kill a deer in 10 states, you could legally possess 10 deer.  For waterfowl which is federally managed, most interpretations would conclude that one "aggregate possession limit" does indeed add all U.S. kills together.  See page 6: http://www.fws.gov/le/pdffiles/50_CFR_20.pdf

Upland birds are probably more like big game, in that each state's limit would not be counted toward another state's possession limit.  This assumes, of course, that it could be clearly demonstated from which state the species in one's possession were legally killed.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Bear Season 2025 by bearhunter99
[Today at 11:26:20 AM]


Stone Glacier packs by 92xj
[Today at 11:02:40 AM]


1st bear of the season for us. by bearhunter99
[Today at 10:58:02 AM]


Scotty's Master Gunsmithing by bb76
[Today at 10:38:46 AM]


It's Starting by salmosalar
[Today at 10:20:42 AM]


Alpine Meadow Bear Hunting and Hikers by James
[Today at 08:47:35 AM]


Comstock Beaver Traps by JakeLand
[Today at 08:13:04 AM]


High buck hunt by OutHouse
[Today at 07:24:27 AM]


Bobcat Traps 4 Sale by Katalla
[Today at 07:10:02 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by OutHouse
[Today at 06:45:30 AM]


25*06 by lhrbull
[Today at 06:33:28 AM]


Please Comment on new Game management Plan, RE Furbearers by JakeLand
[Today at 04:29:19 AM]


AKC Australian Shepherd Puppies by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 09:18:01 PM]


Share your out of state experience by HighlandLofts
[Yesterday at 09:05:12 PM]


New property cams checked by finnman
[Yesterday at 08:35:42 PM]


Beaver Traps 4 Sale by Katalla
[Yesterday at 08:00:20 PM]


Still no bears by greenhead_killer
[Yesterday at 07:45:00 PM]


New 2025 CVA Optima ? by lonedave
[Yesterday at 06:38:59 PM]


Skyline by greenhead_killer
[Yesterday at 06:19:57 PM]


Opening morning by Dave Workman
[Yesterday at 05:56:23 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal