collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Interstate hunting regulations???  (Read 1790 times)

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7245
  • Location: Mukilteo
Interstate hunting regulations???
« on: July 31, 2012, 07:05:50 AM »
Say I take a road trip to North Dakota and shoot my possession limit of pheasants there.  Can I stop in Montana and hunt there if I still have the ND pheasants?  How about WA?

Anyone ever make such as trip?


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25063
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 07:26:11 AM »
Thats a good question that i'd like to know the answer to as well... I would guess that since you have Lic for both and as long as your Phesants from ND are processed then you would be ok.  :dunno:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21865
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 07:11:45 PM »
That is an interesting question.  I will do some research. My initial thought: for big game such as deer there is no "possession limit": if you can legally kill a deer in 10 states, you could legally possess 10 deer.  For waterfowl which is federally managed, most interpretations would conclude that one "aggregate possession limit" does indeed add all U.S. kills together.  See page 6: http://www.fws.gov/le/pdffiles/50_CFR_20.pdf

Upland birds are probably more like big game, in that each state's limit would not be counted toward another state's possession limit.  This assumes, of course, that it could be clearly demonstated from which state the species in one's possession were legally killed.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho deer question by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 11:08:25 PM]


good area for idaho elk open to public by pd
[Yesterday at 10:29:47 PM]


Who knows electric bikes? looking at Quietkat options by Westside88
[Yesterday at 09:00:34 PM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by ASHQUACK
[Yesterday at 08:55:35 PM]


Blackstone newbie by kenzmad
[Yesterday at 08:48:46 PM]


Anyone own a Hewescraft Sportsman 160? by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 08:23:33 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Yesterday at 08:03:41 PM]


Tease 'l' by highcountry_hunter
[Yesterday at 07:43:59 PM]


Quality deer hunt by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 07:36:09 PM]


Ice fishing for walleye by Russ McDonald
[Yesterday at 07:05:13 PM]


Put a ring on it by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 05:20:59 PM]


Hunting DNR Natural Area Preserves by 509
[Yesterday at 05:18:11 PM]


Pointing Dog Trainer by wildweeds
[Yesterday at 04:52:56 PM]


Homemade saltwater fishing gear by Wetwoodshunter
[Yesterday at 04:32:08 PM]


Montana Cutting Deer Licenses by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 02:55:36 PM]


The Lookback by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 01:06:08 PM]


This year, last year by Caseknife
[Yesterday at 12:58:10 PM]


Stickers by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 12:16:11 PM]


From Behind by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 11:48:13 AM]


Kubota repair shop by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 10:40:20 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal