collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Interstate hunting regulations???  (Read 1768 times)

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7211
  • Location: Mukilteo
Interstate hunting regulations???
« on: July 31, 2012, 07:05:50 AM »
Say I take a road trip to North Dakota and shoot my possession limit of pheasants there.  Can I stop in Montana and hunt there if I still have the ND pheasants?  How about WA?

Anyone ever make such as trip?


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25062
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 07:26:11 AM »
Thats a good question that i'd like to know the answer to as well... I would guess that since you have Lic for both and as long as your Phesants from ND are processed then you would be ok.  :dunno:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21837
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 07:11:45 PM »
That is an interesting question.  I will do some research. My initial thought: for big game such as deer there is no "possession limit": if you can legally kill a deer in 10 states, you could legally possess 10 deer.  For waterfowl which is federally managed, most interpretations would conclude that one "aggregate possession limit" does indeed add all U.S. kills together.  See page 6: http://www.fws.gov/le/pdffiles/50_CFR_20.pdf

Upland birds are probably more like big game, in that each state's limit would not be counted toward another state's possession limit.  This assumes, of course, that it could be clearly demonstated from which state the species in one's possession were legally killed.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 deer, let's see em! by shmacker
[Today at 11:59:28 AM]


Pan Fried Chicken Recipes by Fidelk
[Today at 11:18:31 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Blacktail Sniper
[Today at 09:26:08 AM]


2025 General Season Rifle Hunt VIDEO. by JDArms1240
[Today at 08:57:03 AM]


2025 Mt. St. Helens success? by Mulie87
[Today at 08:26:10 AM]


The One by Rem14
[Today at 08:25:43 AM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by dmoua
[Today at 08:04:17 AM]


Who knows Stihl Chainsaws? messed up and cooked my 044 hoping to save/rebuild by Emptyhanded
[Today at 07:39:46 AM]


Bullet performance 2025? by highcountry_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:33:11 PM]


Wall Tents Tips and Tricks by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:28:36 PM]


Getting the hang of hanging on to mallards! by 2MANY
[Yesterday at 09:23:11 PM]


Blue mountains deer permit by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:18:11 PM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by hunter399
[Yesterday at 07:16:32 PM]


DIY Cascade Roosevelt Bull Taxidermy Project by Hunting Cowboy
[Yesterday at 05:37:03 PM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by bighorns2bushytails
[Yesterday at 04:10:38 PM]


Aladdin unit 111 mule deer quality tag by bigmacc
[Yesterday at 03:21:16 PM]


Blood trailing in the rain by blackveltbowhunter
[Yesterday at 03:06:53 PM]


Youth Cow Elk - Yakima South GMUs 364, 368 by knh
[Yesterday at 01:54:35 PM]


Skagit Question by lovetogrouse
[Yesterday at 01:35:18 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal