collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Interstate hunting regulations???  (Read 1762 times)

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7199
  • Location: Mukilteo
Interstate hunting regulations???
« on: July 31, 2012, 07:05:50 AM »
Say I take a road trip to North Dakota and shoot my possession limit of pheasants there.  Can I stop in Montana and hunt there if I still have the ND pheasants?  How about WA?

Anyone ever make such as trip?


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25060
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 07:26:11 AM »
Thats a good question that i'd like to know the answer to as well... I would guess that since you have Lic for both and as long as your Phesants from ND are processed then you would be ok.  :dunno:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21827
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 07:11:45 PM »
That is an interesting question.  I will do some research. My initial thought: for big game such as deer there is no "possession limit": if you can legally kill a deer in 10 states, you could legally possess 10 deer.  For waterfowl which is federally managed, most interpretations would conclude that one "aggregate possession limit" does indeed add all U.S. kills together.  See page 6: http://www.fws.gov/le/pdffiles/50_CFR_20.pdf

Upland birds are probably more like big game, in that each state's limit would not be counted toward another state's possession limit.  This assumes, of course, that it could be clearly demonstated from which state the species in one's possession were legally killed.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Color phase fox by Jpmiller
[Today at 02:54:40 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 10:51:39 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 10:47:35 PM]


Late Alta Muzzy by BoomWhop
[Yesterday at 10:24:17 PM]


Possible record bull? by Limhangerslayer
[Yesterday at 09:13:55 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by Moose Master
[Yesterday at 09:04:51 PM]


re-barreling a gun by Bob33
[Yesterday at 07:13:13 PM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by greenhead_killer
[Yesterday at 06:32:24 PM]


AMMO 6.5 PRC 143 Gr ELD-X Hornady by dblungshot
[Yesterday at 06:22:55 PM]


CWD drop off station- What a joke! by tgomez
[Yesterday at 05:12:43 PM]


Krackers Blow your doors off Razor chowder by avidnwoutdoorsman
[Yesterday at 03:32:06 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by CNELK
[Yesterday at 01:54:45 PM]


Boring & relining .22 barrel, any recommendations? by Blacktail Sniper
[Yesterday at 12:14:08 PM]


Muzzleloader scope options by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 12:10:09 PM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 11:27:03 AM]


Selkirk GMU 113 Moose by Ridgeratt
[Yesterday at 11:22:29 AM]


seeking recommendation for women's raingear by Westside88
[Yesterday at 11:16:28 AM]


European mounts around Spokane by washingtonmuley
[Yesterday at 11:12:05 AM]


Dehydrating Chantrelles by ASHQUACK
[Yesterday at 09:10:20 AM]


2025 Deer season/hunter399 by hunter399
[Yesterday at 09:02:52 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal