collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Proposed draft 2013 regulations now available  (Read 7105 times)

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 16214
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: Proposed draft 2013 regulations now available
« Reply #15 on: January 31, 2013, 12:06:40 PM »
What about the moose? I am getting that they are again changing it to 1 moose in a persons lifetime. Basically not letting people apply for cow moose hunts that have taken a bull before. Anyone else read it that way? :dunno: I know I have put in for it for the last 3 years and it would suck if they didn't let people use there points they have established.
I think that question would apply to even those that haven't been drawn before.  If it is now once in a lifetime my cow points are worthless as I will only be putting in for bull from now on.
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Proposed draft 2013 regulations now available
« Reply #16 on: January 31, 2013, 12:11:55 PM »
I thought it said bull permit.  I think if you drew an antlerless only one you are still good to go for a bull.  Wonder if it works the other way around though?  If you draw a bull permit, can you continue to apply for cows?

According to this, deer hunting will only be allowed on San Juan Island since they did not change the Seasons/Limits table to include the new GMUs that they want to make for each island.  Only 2nd deer antlerless hunts will be allowed the way it is listed.  And, Stuart and some of the other smaller islands are not included in any GMU's , this is so stupid!

Offline 6x6in6

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3593
  • Location: Bellingham, WA
Re: Proposed draft 2013 regulations now available
« Reply #17 on: January 31, 2013, 12:19:00 PM »
What about the moose? I am getting that they are again changing it to 1 moose in a persons lifetime. Basically not letting people apply for cow moose hunts that have taken a bull before. Anyone else read it that way? :dunno: I know I have put in for it for the last 3 years and it would suck if they didn't let people use there points they have established.
The draft makes it kind of difficult to read.  Here is it how it will read, if approved, and with the changes made:

(a) Who May Apply:
Anyone EXCEPT those who previously harvested a moose in Washington state may apply for a moose permit.  An individual may only harvest one moose
during his or her lifetime.  However, this restriction is waived for hunters who have previously harvested a moose under an antlerless-only, master-hunter hunt, raffle, or auction permit, as well as for applications for an antlerless-only, master-hunter, raffle, or auction permit.

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Proposed draft 2013 regulations now available
« Reply #18 on: January 31, 2013, 12:20:01 PM »
What about the moose? I am getting that they are again changing it to 1 moose in a persons lifetime. Basically not letting people apply for cow moose hunts that have taken a bull before. Anyone else read it that way? :dunno: I know I have put in for it for the last 3 years and it would suck if they didn't let people use there points they have established.

Yet another example of why the category system is flawed.  They never should have had separate categories for OIL species.  Then when WDFW decides to change the rules, they will get complaints by people with points in categories that can't make use of those points.  They could have avoided that problem by not having separate categories. :twocents:
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline asl20bball

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 358
  • Location: Maple Valley
Re: Proposed draft 2013 regulations now available
« Reply #19 on: January 31, 2013, 12:38:05 PM »
 :chuckle: I just about sharted my pants thinking the proposed season dates for Muzzy and Firearm deer were to began on a Sunday....then I realized that was the 2012 dates.   :chuckle:
Take up your bow, a quiver full of arrows, head out to the country and hunt some wild game.  GEN 27:3

Offline 6x6in6

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3593
  • Location: Bellingham, WA
Re: Proposed draft 2013 regulations now available
« Reply #20 on: January 31, 2013, 12:45:34 PM »
What about the moose? I am getting that they are again changing it to 1 moose in a persons lifetime. Basically not letting people apply for cow moose hunts that have taken a bull before. Anyone else read it that way? :dunno: I know I have put in for it for the last 3 years and it would suck if they didn't let people use there points they have established.
The draft makes it kind of difficult to read.  Here is it how it will read, if approved, and with the changes made:

(a) Who May Apply:
Anyone EXCEPT those who previously harvested a moose in Washington state may apply for a moose permit.  An individual may only harvest one moose
during his or her lifetime.  However, this restriction is waived for hunters who have previously harvested a moose under an antlerless only, master-hunter hunt, raffle, or auction permit, as well as for applications for an antlerless-only, master-hunter, raffle, or auction permit.

I think what they are trying to say here, above in my prior quote, is that the "as well as" part of the last sentence may mean those who were drawn for a bull tag may continue to apply for an antlerless tag?   :dunno: 

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Proposed draft 2013 regulations now available
« Reply #21 on: January 31, 2013, 12:53:48 PM »
What about the moose? I am getting that they are again changing it to 1 moose in a persons lifetime. Basically not letting people apply for cow moose hunts that have taken a bull before. Anyone else read it that way? :dunno: I know I have put in for it for the last 3 years and it would suck if they didn't let people use there points they have established.
The draft makes it kind of difficult to read.  Here is it how it will read, if approved, and with the changes made:

(a) Who May Apply:
Anyone EXCEPT those who previously harvested a moose in Washington state may apply for a moose permit.  An individual may only harvest one moose
during his or her lifetime.  However, this restriction is waived for hunters who have previously harvested a moose under an antlerless only, master-hunter hunt, raffle, or auction permit, as well as for applications for an antlerless-only, master-hunter, raffle, or auction permit.

I think what they are trying to say here, above in my prior quote, is that the "as well as" part of the last sentence may mean those who were drawn for a bull tag may continue to apply for an antlerless tag?   :dunno:

I can see that possibility.  Very cumbersome verbage though.

Offline 6x6in6

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3593
  • Location: Bellingham, WA
Re: Proposed draft 2013 regulations now available
« Reply #22 on: January 31, 2013, 12:58:58 PM »
What about the moose? I am getting that they are again changing it to 1 moose in a persons lifetime. Basically not letting people apply for cow moose hunts that have taken a bull before. Anyone else read it that way? :dunno: I know I have put in for it for the last 3 years and it would suck if they didn't let people use there points they have established.
The draft makes it kind of difficult to read.  Here is it how it will read, if approved, and with the changes made:

(a) Who May Apply:
Anyone EXCEPT those who previously harvested a moose in Washington state may apply for a moose permit.  An individual may only harvest one moose
during his or her lifetime.  However, this restriction is waived for hunters who have previously harvested a moose under an antlerless only, master-hunter hunt, raffle, or auction permit, as well as for applications for an antlerless-only, master-hunter, raffle, or auction permit.

I think what they are trying to say here, above in my prior quote, is that the "as well as" part of the last sentence may mean those who were drawn for a bull tag may continue to apply for an antlerless tag?   :dunno:

I can see that possibility.  Very cumbersome verbage though.
Yeah, you would think they could make the language a bit clearer if this be the case.  I mean, confusing language can cause a loss of application revenue to the coffers which a good share of us strongly feel the bust up the special ap's was a pure money grab.   :chuckle:

Offline chukarchaser

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 463
Re: Proposed draft 2013 regulations now available
« Reply #23 on: January 31, 2013, 09:19:57 PM »
Anyone else notice that this years new revenue stream would appear to be shifting general doe tags to second deer tags?   

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Proposed draft 2013 regulations now available
« Reply #24 on: January 31, 2013, 10:03:30 PM »
Anyone else notice that this years new revenue stream would appear to be shifting general doe tags to second deer tags?

Surprised???   $$$$$$$$$$

Offline chukarchaser

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 463
Re: Proposed draft 2013 regulations now available
« Reply #25 on: January 31, 2013, 10:58:55 PM »
No I guess not, just depressed that the they will for single out the most vulnerable user group each increase.  eventually driving more and more away from the sport until we have no clout and then they can do away with hunting or just make it for the very rich just like Europe 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Pouge unit help by jstone
[Today at 12:47:37 PM]


What are some good 12 ga factory loads for predators? by Blacktail Sniper
[Today at 11:33:03 AM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by ganghis
[Today at 10:04:09 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Bonehuntn
[Today at 09:53:06 AM]


What gmu's in sw Washington hold elk? by Sundance
[Today at 09:26:43 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Shooter4
[Today at 08:10:30 AM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by HntnFsh
[Today at 08:06:15 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 07:59:15 AM]


New scope or not? by Sneaky
[Today at 07:02:05 AM]


Making memories by boneaddict
[Today at 06:17:16 AM]


Question about hunting wilderness areas by Threewolves
[Today at 04:01:56 AM]


Called about Returned Alta Buck Permit by Shrimper
[Yesterday at 10:17:51 PM]


Idaho unit 10A by Naches Sportsman
[Yesterday at 08:44:27 PM]


Any MT deer updates? by Britt-dog
[Yesterday at 08:32:50 PM]


Grizzly? by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 07:38:21 PM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by Stein
[Yesterday at 07:35:27 PM]


Cash Poor/Equity Rich And Don't Want To Refinance by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 07:13:04 PM]


Palouse buck deer by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 06:27:11 PM]


What pond creature am I dealing with here? by Barehunter
[Yesterday at 06:16:30 PM]


cougar calling locations by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 05:06:42 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal