Free: Contests & Raffles.
Since i am a meat hunter i would say overall body size. Big fat hogs of bears. Agreed on a few points...all over the state where pressure is less and forage is abundant there will be big bears. Big in body should also relate to big skulls.
Radsav....very interesting...thanks for posting up.
Quote from: h20hunter on March 05, 2013, 06:27:17 AMSince i am a meat hunter i would say overall body size. Big fat hogs of bears. Agreed on a few points...all over the state where pressure is less and forage is abundant there will be big bears. Big in body should also relate to big skulls.In Washington state big bodies don't neccessarily relate to big skulls. It's an oddity I don't quite understand as Vancouver Island has big skulls and Oregon has big skulls, but Washington rarely does. The record books reflect this. In Oregon you shoot a 325# bear and you'll probably make P&Y. In Washington we've taken boars as large as 450# that don't make P&Y minimums.Want big bodies...I'd go late Sept early October on high west slope of the Cascades. Green River Watershed and north. There are pockets of good skulls in there, but not very wide spread. Also Early September far enough on the coast you can smell the salt. Want big skulls...I would probably not be hunting west of the pacific crest. Unless I was going to the mid coast south. Again I want to be close enough to the coast to smell the salt. The coastal bears are not what they used to be. Few eat fish anymore and government hunters took out a lot of the good gene pool late 60's into the early seventies. But there are still larger pockets of big ones to be found than on the high west slope Cascades. They are just A LOT harder to hunt now that you can not use bait.