Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: elk247 on October 27, 2013, 10:22:43 AM I would like to see problem elk relocated across the river into the hills of the sauk unit.The OP did say the shooting was on the S Skagit highway
I would like to see problem elk relocated across the river into the hills of the sauk unit.
Are bulls the only problem in this area?
Quote from: Knocker of rocks on October 27, 2013, 10:27:28 AMQuote from: elk247 on October 27, 2013, 10:22:43 AM I would like to see problem elk relocated across the river into the hills of the sauk unit.The OP did say the shooting was on the S Skagit highwayDo you just enjoy trying to discredit everyone? Go back and read my post about the problem elk on hiway 20 and the watchable wildlife area. The op was talking about S. Skagit, i was not. I have many co-workers that have these elk in there yards daily. I have second hand info from what i consider to be a reliable source, but sharing it here will be a waste of my time obviously.
Quote from: huntnphool on October 27, 2013, 10:36:26 AMAre bulls the only problem in this area?I would imagine if it is anything like the herd that causes problems on the Olympic peninsula, that bulls aren't the only problem but they cause way more damage per animal than the cows. The herd of cows will feed on crops and trample some stuff, but usually have their routes long established and don't do a whole lot more unless pushed. The bulls like to rake out big wallows in fields and tear up fences and go out in all directions tearing stuff up. For the herd on the peninsula when they were left alone, the only real damage from the cows/calves was eating a percentage of the crops. Then all the wildlife watcher types have shown up trying to take photos and they keep trying to get closer and it causes the herd to run--leaving big trampled areas, some fence damage and chased elk out into the highway.
Why would anyone doubt the op? I belive him. This is exactily why people aee upset with the dfw. Over 50 elk have been hit by rigs this year from those herds. There is a problem. They should have handled it through a general season late hunt. Too many of us buy tags to see animals go to the soup kitchen.
Quote from: elk247 on October 27, 2013, 12:31:15 AMWhy would anyone doubt the op? I belive him. This is exactily why people aee upset with the dfw. Over 50 elk have been hit by rigs this year from those herds. There is a problem. They should have handled it through a general season late hunt. Too many of us buy tags to see animals go to the soup kitchen.Maybe because he has 21 posts, and started this thread about secret Federal agents shooting elk in the dark. His information is second hand, and to those who seek more proof he answers "go up there and look". To you, Mr Elk247, I answer, why would you believe the OP? His post is incendiary and poorly supported, and there is no reason to take his word as gospel until more information is received
Quote from: fckfords07 on October 27, 2013, 09:51:56 AMWho, from wdfw, can we email about this?I would not bother with DFW . I would rattle local reps. Starting with Kirk Pearson.He is holding a senate resource meeting in Mount Vernon on Tuesday.The DFW is not afraid of us. They are afraid of law makers.
Who, from wdfw, can we email about this?
Is this gmu near the elk area that got all the bad press a few years ago when some people got video of the elk being arrowed in the pasture?I could see WDFW wanting to control numbers in a way that they felt would get the job done quick and quiet.
Quote from: elk247 on October 27, 2013, 10:45:46 AMQuote from: Knocker of rocks on October 27, 2013, 10:27:28 AMQuote from: elk247 on October 27, 2013, 10:22:43 AM I would like to see problem elk relocated across the river into the hills of the sauk unit.The OP did say the shooting was on the S Skagit highwayDo you just enjoy trying to discredit everyone? Go back and read my post about the problem elk on hiway 20 and the watchable wildlife area. The op was talking about S. Skagit, i was not. I have many co-workers that have these elk in there yards daily. I have second hand info from what i consider to be a reliable source, but sharing it here will be a waste of my time obviously.What I was trying to point out, is that the problem is on the south side of the river, right where you want to relocate the north side animals to. One doesn't have to be the smartest man in the room to wonder if that would not exacerbate the problem.Sorry I got you butt hurt
I received what I feel is the final conformation just now. This is happening. Shooters from the USDA are doing it. I have known this person more than 20 years. He is straight up with me.He said in a short answer to a email I sent Yes by the USDA.So I was a doubter, now I am 100% convinced.To the OP thank you for the heads up.For myself I am sickened . The elk are a problem, but hunters could have been part of the solution. Why not shoot them if they must and let un filled tag holders tag the meat. At least some of the folks who plug down there cash for tags and permit draws could maybe get some thing back.
Quote from: Knocker of rocks on October 27, 2013, 06:44:47 AMQuote from: elk247 on October 27, 2013, 12:31:15 AMWhy would anyone doubt the op? I belive him. This is exactily why people aee upset with the dfw. Over 50 elk have been hit by rigs this year from those herds. There is a problem. They should have handled it through a general season late hunt. Too many of us buy tags to see animals go to the soup kitchen.Maybe because he has 21 posts, and started this thread about secret Federal agents shooting elk in the dark. His information is second hand, and to those who seek more proof he answers "go up there and look". To you, Mr Elk247, I answer, why would you believe the OP? His post is incendiary and poorly supported, and there is no reason to take his word as gospel until more information is received I was also informed that the meat is going to tribal food banks instead of our own which is crap! our hard earned money and tax dollars spent to provide more elk to the tribes