Free: Contests & Raffles.
"I was informed this last week (Oct 21st) that a young lady, Dawn Garton, who had such a coveted permit, did take a branched bull within the unit. It was further reported that William Moore/WDFW R3 Biologist told her prior to the hunt, with witnesses, that the radio collars might not be very visible on bulls and that if she did take a bull with a collar she could take another bull to replace the meat lost. "While the timing of the collaring was really bad, I don't see the issue you are putting forth here. She took a bull with a collar, and has the same choices she had presented to her before the hunt. The comment about the collar being hard to see is clearly the bio telling her to be careful about pulling the trigger on a bull. You think a collar is hard to see? Ask a guy if that spike filtering in and out of the trees across the canyon has a 2" point somewhere on one of his antlers.She knew the score going into the game. Was it idea that the WDFW effectively tainted the meat ahead of time? Absolutely not, and I think they need to be held to account for that. But should she get to change the rules as presented to her just because she killed a big bull with a collar, even though she was fully aware (with witnesses) that she would not be able to keep the meat from the bull if she killed it? I don't think so.
That's a bunch of questions. I'm not sure about the importance of some of them- including needing to know the staff involved???Surely poor timing on the states part. Why didn't she take the meat offered? I know it's a distant consolation prize, but it was probably the best they could do, right then. Should she be able to go kill another elk...hmmmm I don't know.