collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle  (Read 27805 times)

Offline bhawley76

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 939
  • Location: curlew wa
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #75 on: December 12, 2013, 12:18:54 PM »
270 would be my choice, if recoil is a problem put a break on it. maybe down the road you can chamber it out to a weatherby if you are looking for a lil more :twocents: thats one of my favorate go to's that I have.

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8099
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #76 on: December 12, 2013, 12:44:32 PM »
:) .270 will do anything the .243 will, but the 243 will not do everything the 270 will.
Carl
A 270 cant shoot as a repeater out of a short action like a 243 can  :chuckle:
 :sry: just had to...

Offline 2ndtimer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2013
  • Posts: 3
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Groups: NRA
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #77 on: December 15, 2013, 06:23:38 PM »
I have used the .243 Win, .270 Win, 7mm-08,  and while I haven't had a .260 Rem, I do have a Howa 1500 chambered for the 6.5x55 Swedish Mauser.  All of them are fine cartridges and would work well for the tasks mentioned, coyotes and deer.  Obviously, the .243 is going to have the least recoil, but if you get one in a short barrel youth model, the muzzle blast might make for a greater flinch than a 22" barrel .270 Win.  If the OP handloads, I would suggest the .270 Win.  It can easily be loaded down to .243 Win recoil levels, and in full load version is capable of handling larger game.  If the OP is not a handloader, then the .243 Win is probably the best option, just don't fall for the 16" barrel version.  I don't like muzzle brakes, either, because you only get one pair of ears, and they need to last you your whole life.

Offline bhawley76

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 939
  • Location: curlew wa
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #78 on: December 16, 2013, 07:45:20 AM »
I only use the break at the range, they are loud. but I just take it off and put on the cap when hunting. I had one made for all of my bigger guns it works great

Offline dscubame

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3603
  • Location: Spokane WA
  • 2013 Idaho Elk Hunt
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #79 on: December 16, 2013, 02:58:53 PM »
I like them to be able to hold on target and continue the scope view after the shot, l will even be putting one on the .243.  There are more advantages to them than just recoil reduction.  Also there are certain mfg that do not increase the shooters decibel level.
It's a TIKKA thing..., you may not understand.

Eyes in the Woods.   ' '

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4498
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #80 on: December 16, 2013, 03:26:13 PM »
In the day of enlightenment, who the heck shoots without hearing protection ????

Id put a brake on anything....nice watching impact and staying on target through out the shot cycle. 

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #81 on: December 16, 2013, 04:39:36 PM »
In the day of enlightenment, who the heck shoots without hearing protection ??

You mean while hunting? Or target shooting?

Offline bhawley76

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 939
  • Location: curlew wa
Re: 243 vs. 270 opinions for general purpose rifle
« Reply #82 on: December 17, 2013, 07:22:08 AM »
What? :chuckle:

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Breaking news: Lorna Smith and WWF sue WDFW Director and Deputy Director by Westside88
[Today at 09:22:43 PM]


Bucket List Elk shed help wanted by hunter399
[Today at 09:01:54 PM]


Discretion !!! by beav1980
[Today at 08:51:01 PM]


.45-70 Loads and Twist Rate by jrebel
[Today at 08:43:40 PM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by HntnFsh
[Today at 08:39:36 PM]


Your biggest spike elk by Brute
[Today at 08:04:49 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by fishngamereaper
[Today at 08:02:37 PM]


Multi season draw odds by tonymiller7
[Today at 06:43:40 PM]


Youth turkey season 2026 by Bunny Thumper
[Today at 06:20:18 PM]


Razor Clams by Sitka_Blacktail
[Today at 04:55:52 PM]


12th Annual - 2026 YOUTH TURKEY HUNT CONTEST (enter by Mar 15) by teanawayslayer
[Today at 10:30:39 AM]


Cancellation Alaskan Bear Hunt by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 11:33:49 PM]


Chasing the kids by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 07:38:39 PM]


MA10 Blackmouth anyone? by CP
[Yesterday at 07:16:06 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by Mfowl
[Yesterday at 06:31:00 PM]


Questions regarding WDFW Commissioner use of taxpayer money by Jake Dogfish
[Yesterday at 06:29:24 PM]


Big game season proposals by Ghost Hunter
[Yesterday at 04:40:21 PM]


Can't miss this girl by h2ofowlr
[Yesterday at 02:18:40 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal