collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: spotting scopes under $1000  (Read 20098 times)

Offline Slimdog350

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 236
  • Location: Kelso
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #30 on: December 26, 2013, 09:47:20 AM »
I keep hearing vortex or swaro ....vortex must be pretty good then....who sells vortex around here son I can check them out
I myself have been looking at spotting scopes and have narrowed it down to the vortex razor hd. Find a dealer with one and check them out but if you want to purchase one pm Elknut on this forum and he will hook you up! :tup:

Offline deerhunter_98520

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 8920
  • Location: aberdeen, wa
  • Chief Executive Head Anarchist of YKWTSASFFRO
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #31 on: December 26, 2013, 04:34:09 PM »
Thanks for the input guys  :tup: that's exactly what I was wanting to hear....so unless I come across a great deal on a swaro it will probably be a vortex or Leupold gold ring.....OK so now what do you guys like straight or angled eye piece...advantages/disadvantages? I've only used straight
« Last Edit: December 26, 2013, 04:47:02 PM by deerhunter_98520 »
Official hunt-wa bigfoot field researcher!

Online JPhelps

  • I EAT ELK!!!
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 2915
  • Location: Pe Ell
  • Groups: Rmef, NWTF
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #32 on: December 26, 2013, 05:15:11 PM »
Straight is better for target acquisition and when being used on a Ridgeline. The downfall is the tripod will need to be taller (stability) and the neck will fatigue faster.

The pros for the angled is the lower tripod height, glassing out of the bottoms and more comfortable over long periods.  Downfall for me is not being able to quickly find the target.

With that said I prefer a straight spotter.

Offline Alan K

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 3062
  • Location: Lewis County, WA
  • University of Idaho Alumni
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #33 on: December 26, 2013, 05:22:15 PM »
Straight is better for target acquisition and when being used on a Ridgeline. The downfall is the tripod will need to be taller (stability) and the neck will fatigue faster.

The pros for the angled is the lower tripod height, glassing out of the bottoms and more comfortable over long periods.  Downfall for me is not being able to quickly find the target.

With that said I prefer a straight spotter.

Well said, straight for me too!

Offline deerhunter_98520

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 8920
  • Location: aberdeen, wa
  • Chief Executive Head Anarchist of YKWTSASFFRO
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #34 on: December 26, 2013, 05:26:30 PM »
Good enough reasons for me straight it is
Official hunt-wa bigfoot field researcher!

Offline teanawayslayer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 4380
  • Location: Eastside
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #35 on: December 26, 2013, 06:27:04 PM »
Can you really "easily" count points on a buck 2 miles away? What x magnification are you talking about? Legit question. Not trying to be a smart guy.
that's at 60x.
Happiness is being in the woods!!!

Offline Crunchy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 5053
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #36 on: December 26, 2013, 08:12:05 PM »
I rarely use the 60 power unless I really want to get up close.  For reference this is a bull from last week at 20 power using my phone camera at I think was 3 or 4 hundred yards.

Offline deerhunter_98520

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 8920
  • Location: aberdeen, wa
  • Chief Executive Head Anarchist of YKWTSASFFRO
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #37 on: December 26, 2013, 08:16:41 PM »
Where was this spot at so I can check it out with my Bushnell to compare  :chuckle:
Official hunt-wa bigfoot field researcher!

Offline cbond3318

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 3275
  • Location: Idaho
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #38 on: December 26, 2013, 08:20:15 PM »
Straight is better for target acquisition and when being used on a Ridgeline. The downfall is the tripod will need to be taller (stability) and the neck will fatigue faster.

The pros for the angled is the lower tripod height, glassing out of the bottoms and more comfortable over long periods.  Downfall for me is not being able to quickly find the target.

With that said I prefer a straight spotter.


Well said, straight for me too!

 :yeah: I have a straight view Nikon and can be on target instantly almost aiming the spotting scope before looking thru it. I spent ten minutes with my buddies angled scope and was lost as soon as I put my eyes thru it. The straight does take getting use to what glassing positions are most comfortable but become habit quickly.
Just tend your own and live.

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8099
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #39 on: December 27, 2013, 09:05:47 AM »
I went with angled. Seemed easier for me to usee on a tripod amd the window mount.

Offline Bill W

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1936
  • Location: Moses Lake
  • Groups: NRA, CBA
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #40 on: December 27, 2013, 10:54:03 AM »
I favored straight eyepiece spotting scopes for hunting and angled for target shooting.   My first straight eyepiece scope also had a set of big "peep sights" on one side that allowed rough aiming at an object.  They were situated so that the object was then in the scope's field of view.    Might be a good add on for an angled eyepiece spotting scope as they shouldn't be too hard to align.

Offline scottcrb

  • NRA, RMEF, Wa marketing director Montucky Cold Snack, MDF, BHA,
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 1103
  • Location: Cle elum
    • Montucky Cold Snacks
  • Groups: nra, RMEF,MDF
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #41 on: December 27, 2013, 11:12:22 AM »
Tagging. Also I used a swarovski last elk season and the angle eye piece is hard to use on a car window mount .

Offline teanawayslayer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 4380
  • Location: Eastside
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #42 on: December 27, 2013, 06:46:42 PM »
my previous nikon was straight.  The new swarovski is angled.  It took quite a few times of using it to get dialed in on my target. I mainly use it in the high country and the angled is the only way to go.
Happiness is being in the woods!!!

Offline deerhunter_98520

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 8920
  • Location: aberdeen, wa
  • Chief Executive Head Anarchist of YKWTSASFFRO
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #43 on: January 12, 2014, 11:35:46 AM »
I checked out the vortex razor hd today and all I can say is wow is that clear...I'll be purchasing one of those like a lot of you recommended  :tup:
Official hunt-wa bigfoot field researcher!

Offline Elkohol

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 115
  • Location: CWU
Re: spotting scopes under $1000
« Reply #44 on: January 12, 2014, 11:52:16 AM »
I checked out the vortex razor hd today and all I can say is wow is that clear...I'll be purchasing one of those like a lot of you recommended  :tup:

Good choice :tup: I ordered mine last Monday.. Can't wait for it to arrive!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Some nice animals from last season by Pathfinder101
[Today at 11:20:11 AM]


turkey hunting question series - question 3 by Dan-o
[Today at 10:42:20 AM]


Looking for Your Help - Donate Used or New Gear by silverdalesauer
[Today at 10:35:54 AM]


Oregon antelope by boneaddict
[Today at 10:34:27 AM]


turkey hunting question series - question 2 by birddogdad
[Today at 10:05:31 AM]


when should i give up on a turkey and move on? by birddogdad
[Today at 10:02:25 AM]


blacktail deer bait by 270Flat
[Today at 10:00:19 AM]


CRSSE license by LayMdown
[Today at 08:30:51 AM]


North Idaho Houndsmen Association Banquet by Machias
[Today at 08:11:25 AM]


First time coyote hunting by birdshooter1189
[Today at 06:47:57 AM]


Birds are gobbling hard now! by bearpaw
[Today at 06:16:17 AM]


Looking for help with Cummins 6CTA (8.3 liter medium duty diesel) by Skillet
[Yesterday at 11:05:51 PM]


Anyone tried the .338 ARC by FlyFish360
[Yesterday at 08:45:04 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 07:17:46 PM]


Wyoming 2026, who's in? by HoytHunter24
[Yesterday at 04:04:10 PM]


Vet's day finale by metlhead
[Yesterday at 03:09:37 PM]


R.I.P. ~ Gary York by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 10:58:04 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal