Free: Contests & Raffles.
I personally dont care for BDC reticles, and would opt for the 4-12. SIght in for 200yd zero and she is money out to 300...........just under center mass @100yds, and just high of center mass @ 300 yards..........simple.
Agreed. I find the circles goofy, myself. I am, however, considering the Zeiss Conquest 4-14x44mm with the z800 reticle. LOL I have been for like 4 years. Just too cheap to throw down on it
BDC is generic for caliber, and not precise, 4-12 will give you a bit more for the 200 and over shooting. Plus the bdc to me, is vague in the aiming points.....I like plex and the ability to sight the fine "X" on my target, not a large circle.......thats just my
Has the BDC always been circles??? I thought it use to be hash marks. I am not sure I would like the circles either. My Leupold has hash marks.
Quote from: buckfvr on March 05, 2014, 11:20:12 AMBDC is generic for caliber, and not precise, 4-12 will give you a bit more for the 200 and over shooting. Plus the bdc to me, is vague in the aiming points.....I like plex and the ability to sight the fine "X" on my target, not a large circle.......thats just my Actually, it's not "generic" for caliber. If you go to the Nikon "Spot On" page you can pick the specific ammo you're shooting, not just caliber. In addition, you can factor in things like muzzle velocity, altitude, wind, and barometric pressure. If you handload you can factor in the exact bullet you're shooting as well. Pretty nifty. The circles...? Well, I can't help you there! Different strokes for different folks.
My next scope for my 30-06 will be a 4-12X instead of a 3-9X. Hunting eastern WA in a point restricted area, I had a heck of a time trying to put a third point on a buck at just under 200 yards. My binocular was an 8X. I'd like the extra zoom.
Quote from: Lincoln4 on March 05, 2014, 11:40:31 AMQuote from: buckfvr on March 05, 2014, 11:20:12 AMBDC is generic for caliber, and not precise, 4-12 will give you a bit more for the 200 and over shooting. Plus the bdc to me, is vague in the aiming points.....I like plex and the ability to sight the fine "X" on my target, not a large circle.......thats just my Actually, it's not "generic" for caliber. If you go to the Nikon "Spot On" page you can pick the specific ammo you're shooting, not just caliber. In addition, you can factor in things like muzzle velocity, altitude, wind, and barometric pressure. If you handload you can factor in the exact bullet you're shooting as well. Pretty nifty. The circles...? Well, I can't help you there! Different strokes for different folks.SO if thats the case, then depending on your specifics, the values placed on each of the aiming points would vary all over the place......By bullet weight, velocity, baro, center of scope over center of bore, etc. To me it seems it would get confusing and would be more difficult than moa.
QuoteMy next scope for my 30-06 will be a 4-12X instead of a 3-9X. Hunting eastern WA in a point restricted area, I had a heck of a time trying to put a third point on a buck at just under 200 yards. My binocular was an 8X. I'd like the extra zoom.You need to find some bigger bucks.
If you are willing to spend a little more money Nikon just recently came out with a new line....Prostaff 5...when you buy one you get a card (or I think you can do it online) to fill out with all your rifle and ammo info and Nikon will send you out some custom made turrets. So you just sight in your scope screw down some set screws then put the turrets on. Then you can just dial the range you want to shot. This way you dial right to what you want and you don't need the BDC.http://www.nikonsportoptics.com/en/Nikon-Products/Riflescopes/6754/PROSTAFF-5-3.5-14x40-Custom-XR-Turret.html
For general hunting purposes, a 3-9x is ideal. the only instance I found more magnification to be needed was on my rifles I use for Ground Squirrel shooting, and I doubt you'll be using a .270 on those...
Quote from: jrebel on March 05, 2014, 11:32:43 AMHas the BDC always been circles??? I thought it use to be hash marks. I am not sure I would like the circles either. My Leupold has hash marks.Anyone is free to correct me if i'm wrong but Im pretty sure it is for Nikon. Leupy and Zeiss seem to stick with the hash marks. With Zeiss you can go to their website and type in your load particulars and get a yardage for each corresponding has mark. If i get around to that I'll likely make a small printout and tape it to my stock.
Quote from: Heredoggydoggy on March 08, 2014, 09:33:58 PMFor general hunting purposes, a 3-9x is ideal. the only instance I found more magnification to be needed was on my rifles I use for Ground Squirrel shooting, and I doubt you'll be using a .270 on those... No for ground Squirrels i will stick with my Marlin 39a .22 with the peep sight. That thing is amazing!