collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.  (Read 7280 times)

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« on: May 27, 2014, 08:44:01 AM »
Have followed up with USFS about hunting pamphlet stating that Monument land is closed to hunting in Margaret Unit.
Here's from the USFS.

"The hunters’ pamphlet is incorrect.  The only area of the Margaret unit inside the Monument where hunting is not allowed is the south-facing slope along the north side of Coldwater Lake, where no off-trail hiking is permitted.  This is the same restriction that has been in place for years, so there is no change in hunting restrictions from previous years."

 Mitch Wainwright
South Zone Wildlife Biologist
Mt. Adams R.D.
Mt. St. Helens R.D.
42218 NE Yale Bridge Rd.
Amboy, WA  98601

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10635
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2014, 08:52:39 AM »
Until WDFW changes it (typically in their pamphlet errata) it will still be illegal to hunt in that area, even if the USFS says it's ok to do so because state regulations (WAC) are currently written to prohibit hunting in that area.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2014, 08:58:57 AM »
Bigtex, I don't see why the WDFW have to make a correction for hunting to be legal in that area.

Here is what the note says in the pamphlet: 

"Currently the USFS does not allow hunting on the portion of GMU 524 that is within Mt. St. Helens National Volcanic Monument per USFS rules."

So if the current USFS rules say it's okay, then it should be.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2014, 09:10:58 AM by bobcat »

Offline Blacktail Sniper

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5916
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Kill'em all...let the gravy sort'em out!!!
  • Groups: blacktail sniper
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2014, 09:03:33 AM »
You really willing to gamble on that?????
It is better to be consistently incorrect than inconsistently correct...

Sarcasm: The ability to insult stupid people without them realizing it. 

My level of sarcasm depends on your level of stupidity...

Sarcasm makes smart people laugh and stupid people mad.

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #4 on: May 27, 2014, 09:09:47 AM »
The USFS also said they will follow-up with the state on a correction.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #5 on: May 27, 2014, 09:15:36 AM »
You really willing to gamble on that?????

Sure, I would. But I didn't apply for Margaret so I don't have to worry. And if I did, I would pay the $150 and hunt Weyerhaeuser.

The note looks to be simply information the WDFW is providing. It doesn't prohibit hunting that area. It only says the USFS does. Well, they don't, so who's going to be enforcing a rule that doesn't exist?

Having said all that, I'm sure the WDFW will put a correction online (where most people won't see it anyway)  :chuckle:
« Last Edit: May 27, 2014, 06:02:29 PM by bobcat »

Offline bowhunterty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 530
  • Location: Eastside
  • Hunt Hard or Stay Home!!!
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #6 on: May 27, 2014, 10:42:42 AM »
Ther has always been a portion closed in the Margaret as stated previously. If the monument was closed to hunting portions of other units would be closed as well. Along with the Upper Smith Creek, Mt Whittier hunts.

Online furbearer365

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 941
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #7 on: May 27, 2014, 05:04:32 PM »
Im glad to hear this.  I put in for the archery tag and have a solid chance to get it.  Im not sure yet whether which area I will hunt if I draw, but it is an archery tag and I cant remember the last time the woods were not shut down at least a bit during September.  At least there is still an option to hunt barring hot weather and an inevitable fire closure by Weyco.  Thanks Fireweed for taking the time to look into this. :tup: :tup:

Offline bowhunterty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 530
  • Location: Eastside
  • Hunt Hard or Stay Home!!!
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #8 on: May 27, 2014, 05:29:56 PM »
Hunted the Margaret the last tw years. Get the Weyerhauser permit if you get drawn. Some dandy areas on Weyerhauser property.

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3496
  • Location: west coast
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #9 on: May 27, 2014, 05:30:39 PM »
Thank you for checking into this  :tup:

That area is the only reason i apply for that unit and with the amount of people getting discouraged from hoof rot or private land issues I feel like this is the year   8) 8)


Offline Big6bull

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 529
  • Location: Wet side
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #10 on: May 27, 2014, 06:14:16 PM »
Thank you for checking into this  :tup:

That area is the only reason i apply for that unit and with the amount of people getting discouraged from hoof rot or private land issues I feel like this is the year   8) 8)

There's just as much of a hoof rot issue up high as there is down lower  :twocents:

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #11 on: May 27, 2014, 06:24:56 PM »
Thank you for checking into this  :tup:

That area is the only reason i apply for that unit and with the amount of people getting discouraged from hoof rot or private land issues I feel like this is the year   8) 8)

There's just as much of a hoof rot issue up high as there is down lower  :twocents:

I think what he's saying is that with hoof rot being prevalent in the St. Helens area, that less people may have applied for the Margaret permit this year, so his odds of drawing are better this year than in the past.

Offline Big6bull

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 529
  • Location: Wet side
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #12 on: May 27, 2014, 08:31:29 PM »
Thank you for checking into this  :tup:

That area is the only reason i apply for that unit and with the amount of people getting discouraged from hoof rot or private land issues I feel like this is the year   8) 8)

There's just as much of a hoof rot issue up high as there is down lower  :twocents:


I think what he's saying is that with hoof rot being prevalent in the St. Helens area, that less people may have applied for the Margaret permit this year, so his odds of drawing are better this year than in the past.

Thanks I read that differently lol.  I'm in the same boat, and would be ecstatic to draw any bull tag in the area!

Offline Bullkllr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 4924
  • Location: Graham
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2014, 03:29:28 PM »
Thank you for checking into this  :tup:

That area is the only reason i apply for that unit and with the amount of people getting discouraged from hoof rot or private land issues I feel like this is the year   8) 8)

There's just as much of a hoof rot issue up high as there is down lower  :twocents:

I think what he's saying is that with hoof rot being prevalent in the St. Helens area, that less people may have applied for the Margaret permit this year, so his odds of drawing are better this year than in the past.

Looking at last year's reported success rates, I'm thinking the draw odds should be getting better anyway:

  Bull Hunts
Mod. Rut- 100%
Modern- 58%
Archery-50%
Muzz- 23.5%
Total overall = 52%

Antlerless Hunts
Modern- 62%
Archery- 13.5%
Muzz- 18.5%
Dis.- 20%
Total Overall = 38%

I know the unit is unique in some ways, but those  success rates are topped by many other units.
Ain't what it used to be by a long shot.
A Man's Gotta Eat

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3496
  • Location: west coast
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #14 on: May 28, 2014, 04:06:38 PM »
Thank you for checking into this  :tup:

That area is the only reason i apply for that unit and with the amount of people getting discouraged from hoof rot or private land issues I feel like this is the year   8) 8)

There's just as much of a hoof rot issue up high as there is down lower  :twocents:

I think what he's saying is that with hoof rot being prevalent in the St. Helens area, that less people may have applied for the Margaret permit this year, so his odds of drawing are better this year than in the past.

Bingo  :tup: you might run into a random infected elk but for the most part the elk in the area up there are pretty healthy

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #15 on: May 28, 2014, 04:18:13 PM »
The access fee will probably reduce application numbers more than the hoof disease. For me it was the two things put together. I considered paying the $150 for access, but then thought I really don't want to pay and especially don't want to pay to kill a sick elk.

Offline bowhunterty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 530
  • Location: Eastside
  • Hunt Hard or Stay Home!!!
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #16 on: May 28, 2014, 04:55:32 PM »
Last year in the late season never saw any sick elk in the Margaret. Saw some nice bulls also.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #17 on: May 28, 2014, 05:05:16 PM »
The bull I killed up high had hoof rot. I haven't seen many limping elk up there but I watched him for a long time and he never limped so who knows.

I think the low success rates are mostly due to people thinking it's gonna be easy. The Margaret is so grown up now it's not drive around and shoot a big bull like it used to be. There are still a ton of elk and some good bulls in there.



Offline DIYARCHERYJUNKIE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 3106
  • Location: hoodcanal
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #18 on: May 29, 2014, 07:15:20 AM »
Did you eat all the meat?  I'm glad to hear all this after being so discouraged about the hoof rot and access.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #19 on: May 29, 2014, 07:38:42 AM »
Absolutely I did. There was nothing wrong with the meat. I've been a part of killing several elk with hoof rot and none of them had tainted meat.



Offline DIYARCHERYJUNKIE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 3106
  • Location: hoodcanal
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #20 on: May 29, 2014, 08:07:37 AM »
Good to know.  I have never hunted the Helens herd.  I will if drawn.  I will buy the access pass too.  I have a spot I hunt that has a lot of elk I don't really see the need to change areas.  But if the hoof rot and permits displace the crowds I could see my area being very crowded.  So I hope I draw but will probably start out of state next year for elk.  I'll buy a tag for the eastside and put in for archery permits but if not selected I'll hunt out of state.

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #21 on: May 29, 2014, 09:14:08 AM »
FYI
The Forest Service is putting together another Land and Water Conservation Fund grant to purchase the Margaret "high Lakes" area.  It has the backing of the Trust for Public Lands.  If any group would like to offer a letter of support to be enclosed with the grant, please PM me.  I think if you sent one in two years ago (like WFW did Thanks!) it is still good.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #22 on: May 29, 2014, 09:17:57 AM »
Will Agnew be willing to sell? I assumed he had that for his own private hunting area.  Great news if they can make it happen!

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3496
  • Location: west coast
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #23 on: May 29, 2014, 09:29:48 AM »
Will Agnew be willing to sell? I assumed he had that for his own private hunting area.  Great news if they can make it happen!

 :yeah:  :yeah: its not just Agnes tho...theres a few different land owners up there


Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10635
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #24 on: May 29, 2014, 09:35:01 AM »
FYI
The Forest Service is putting together another Land and Water Conservation Fund grant to purchase the Margaret "high Lakes" area.  It has the backing of the Trust for Public Lands.  If any group would like to offer a letter of support to be enclosed with the grant, please PM me.  I think if you sent one in two years ago (like WFW did Thanks!) it is still good.
We need to get as much land in the public domain in this state as we can.

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #25 on: May 29, 2014, 10:01:19 AM »
We need to get as much land in the public domain in this state as we can.
Communism hasn't been shown to be a success anywhere else it has been tried, not sure why Washington would be different.   :dunno:

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2014, 10:07:27 AM »
Will Agnew be willing to sell? I assumed he had that for his own private hunting area.  Great news if they can make it happen!
It's not Agnew, but to the east of him, bordering the Monument, with the lakes and access that could reconnect the old Mt. Margaret Trail system.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

If this is your trap by JakeLand
[Today at 04:26:02 PM]


Raffle ticket sales 2025 by trophyhunt
[Today at 03:57:41 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 03:55:08 PM]


The end? Bird bands. by hdshot
[Today at 03:44:43 PM]


WA Moose scouting by TriggerMike
[Today at 03:15:08 PM]


3 days for Kings by Tball77
[Today at 02:46:19 PM]


North Sea Fishing trip by BLH69
[Today at 02:05:14 PM]


2025 Crab! by BLH69
[Today at 02:02:40 PM]


Cell cam recommendation for security? by birdshooter1189
[Today at 10:18:50 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by MMCCAULEY
[Today at 09:25:10 AM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by riflehunter
[Today at 08:03:26 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by CNELK
[Today at 07:31:32 AM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:01:45 AM]


Hunting bears in the thick stuff by J-Bone
[Yesterday at 09:23:26 PM]


Calling in August in Western Washington by J-Bone
[Yesterday at 06:44:50 PM]


How To Get Your $0.00 Tax Stamp - Black Hammer Arms by dreadi
[Yesterday at 06:39:00 PM]


Crabbing at cornet bay? by swanderek
[Yesterday at 06:32:44 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by bobcat
[Yesterday at 06:23:38 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal