collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.  (Read 7487 times)

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39215
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #15 on: May 28, 2014, 04:18:13 PM »
The access fee will probably reduce application numbers more than the hoof disease. For me it was the two things put together. I considered paying the $150 for access, but then thought I really don't want to pay and especially don't want to pay to kill a sick elk.

Offline bowhunterty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 530
  • Location: Eastside
  • Hunt Hard or Stay Home!!!
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #16 on: May 28, 2014, 04:55:32 PM »
Last year in the late season never saw any sick elk in the Margaret. Saw some nice bulls also.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #17 on: May 28, 2014, 05:05:16 PM »
The bull I killed up high had hoof rot. I haven't seen many limping elk up there but I watched him for a long time and he never limped so who knows.

I think the low success rates are mostly due to people thinking it's gonna be easy. The Margaret is so grown up now it's not drive around and shoot a big bull like it used to be. There are still a ton of elk and some good bulls in there.



Offline DIYARCHERYJUNKIE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 3106
  • Location: hoodcanal
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #18 on: May 29, 2014, 07:15:20 AM »
Did you eat all the meat?  I'm glad to hear all this after being so discouraged about the hoof rot and access.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #19 on: May 29, 2014, 07:38:42 AM »
Absolutely I did. There was nothing wrong with the meat. I've been a part of killing several elk with hoof rot and none of them had tainted meat.



Offline DIYARCHERYJUNKIE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 3106
  • Location: hoodcanal
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #20 on: May 29, 2014, 08:07:37 AM »
Good to know.  I have never hunted the Helens herd.  I will if drawn.  I will buy the access pass too.  I have a spot I hunt that has a lot of elk I don't really see the need to change areas.  But if the hoof rot and permits displace the crowds I could see my area being very crowded.  So I hope I draw but will probably start out of state next year for elk.  I'll buy a tag for the eastside and put in for archery permits but if not selected I'll hunt out of state.

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #21 on: May 29, 2014, 09:14:08 AM »
FYI
The Forest Service is putting together another Land and Water Conservation Fund grant to purchase the Margaret "high Lakes" area.  It has the backing of the Trust for Public Lands.  If any group would like to offer a letter of support to be enclosed with the grant, please PM me.  I think if you sent one in two years ago (like WFW did Thanks!) it is still good.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39215
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #22 on: May 29, 2014, 09:17:57 AM »
Will Agnew be willing to sell? I assumed he had that for his own private hunting area.  Great news if they can make it happen!

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3505
  • Location: west coast
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #23 on: May 29, 2014, 09:29:48 AM »
Will Agnew be willing to sell? I assumed he had that for his own private hunting area.  Great news if they can make it happen!

 :yeah:  :yeah: its not just Agnes tho...theres a few different land owners up there


Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10663
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #24 on: May 29, 2014, 09:35:01 AM »
FYI
The Forest Service is putting together another Land and Water Conservation Fund grant to purchase the Margaret "high Lakes" area.  It has the backing of the Trust for Public Lands.  If any group would like to offer a letter of support to be enclosed with the grant, please PM me.  I think if you sent one in two years ago (like WFW did Thanks!) it is still good.
We need to get as much land in the public domain in this state as we can.

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #25 on: May 29, 2014, 10:01:19 AM »
We need to get as much land in the public domain in this state as we can.
Communism hasn't been shown to be a success anywhere else it has been tried, not sure why Washington would be different.   :dunno:

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2014, 10:07:27 AM »
Will Agnew be willing to sell? I assumed he had that for his own private hunting area.  Great news if they can make it happen!
It's not Agnew, but to the east of him, bordering the Monument, with the lakes and access that could reconnect the old Mt. Margaret Trail system.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Selkirk bull moose. by millerwheeler
[Today at 08:26:28 PM]


Late season in gods Country My big buck by High Climber
[Today at 08:23:19 PM]


Idaho deer question by Tbob
[Today at 08:20:43 PM]


Real world feedback needed: Rangefinder Binos by actionshooter
[Today at 08:06:20 PM]


The Okanogan Deer Book by Ridgerunner
[Today at 07:56:42 PM]


Best service for estimating draw odds by actionshooter
[Today at 07:50:29 PM]


Cowichie muzzy bull this year by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 07:43:52 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by 10thmountainarcher
[Today at 07:21:33 PM]


Diarrhea ? by Knocker of rocks
[Today at 06:39:31 PM]


Old recessed buck by boneaddict
[Today at 06:29:16 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 06:19:55 PM]


Big Bull Elk Hit On Hwy 970? by Roslyn Rambler
[Today at 06:19:23 PM]


My wife found her first shed by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 05:18:09 PM]


Perfect evening hunt by bearhunter99
[Today at 05:16:50 PM]


WA Bucket List….Mule Deer Permit by huntnphool
[Today at 04:44:02 PM]


White River late archery by trophyhunt
[Today at 04:23:56 PM]


Long distance love affair by boneaddict
[Today at 03:37:45 PM]


5 Points......(mule deer or blacktails) by boneaddict
[Today at 02:46:16 PM]


Dash cams by CP
[Today at 12:44:52 PM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by bearhunter99
[Today at 11:04:37 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal