collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.  (Read 7281 times)

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« on: May 27, 2014, 08:44:01 AM »
Have followed up with USFS about hunting pamphlet stating that Monument land is closed to hunting in Margaret Unit.
Here's from the USFS.

"The hunters’ pamphlet is incorrect.  The only area of the Margaret unit inside the Monument where hunting is not allowed is the south-facing slope along the north side of Coldwater Lake, where no off-trail hiking is permitted.  This is the same restriction that has been in place for years, so there is no change in hunting restrictions from previous years."

 Mitch Wainwright
South Zone Wildlife Biologist
Mt. Adams R.D.
Mt. St. Helens R.D.
42218 NE Yale Bridge Rd.
Amboy, WA  98601

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10635
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2014, 08:52:39 AM »
Until WDFW changes it (typically in their pamphlet errata) it will still be illegal to hunt in that area, even if the USFS says it's ok to do so because state regulations (WAC) are currently written to prohibit hunting in that area.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2014, 08:58:57 AM »
Bigtex, I don't see why the WDFW have to make a correction for hunting to be legal in that area.

Here is what the note says in the pamphlet: 

"Currently the USFS does not allow hunting on the portion of GMU 524 that is within Mt. St. Helens National Volcanic Monument per USFS rules."

So if the current USFS rules say it's okay, then it should be.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2014, 09:10:58 AM by bobcat »

Offline Blacktail Sniper

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5916
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Kill'em all...let the gravy sort'em out!!!
  • Groups: blacktail sniper
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2014, 09:03:33 AM »
You really willing to gamble on that?????
It is better to be consistently incorrect than inconsistently correct...

Sarcasm: The ability to insult stupid people without them realizing it. 

My level of sarcasm depends on your level of stupidity...

Sarcasm makes smart people laugh and stupid people mad.

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #4 on: May 27, 2014, 09:09:47 AM »
The USFS also said they will follow-up with the state on a correction.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #5 on: May 27, 2014, 09:15:36 AM »
You really willing to gamble on that?????

Sure, I would. But I didn't apply for Margaret so I don't have to worry. And if I did, I would pay the $150 and hunt Weyerhaeuser.

The note looks to be simply information the WDFW is providing. It doesn't prohibit hunting that area. It only says the USFS does. Well, they don't, so who's going to be enforcing a rule that doesn't exist?

Having said all that, I'm sure the WDFW will put a correction online (where most people won't see it anyway)  :chuckle:
« Last Edit: May 27, 2014, 06:02:29 PM by bobcat »

Offline bowhunterty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 530
  • Location: Eastside
  • Hunt Hard or Stay Home!!!
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #6 on: May 27, 2014, 10:42:42 AM »
Ther has always been a portion closed in the Margaret as stated previously. If the monument was closed to hunting portions of other units would be closed as well. Along with the Upper Smith Creek, Mt Whittier hunts.

Offline furbearer365

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 941
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #7 on: May 27, 2014, 05:04:32 PM »
Im glad to hear this.  I put in for the archery tag and have a solid chance to get it.  Im not sure yet whether which area I will hunt if I draw, but it is an archery tag and I cant remember the last time the woods were not shut down at least a bit during September.  At least there is still an option to hunt barring hot weather and an inevitable fire closure by Weyco.  Thanks Fireweed for taking the time to look into this. :tup: :tup:

Offline bowhunterty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 530
  • Location: Eastside
  • Hunt Hard or Stay Home!!!
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #8 on: May 27, 2014, 05:29:56 PM »
Hunted the Margaret the last tw years. Get the Weyerhauser permit if you get drawn. Some dandy areas on Weyerhauser property.

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3496
  • Location: west coast
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #9 on: May 27, 2014, 05:30:39 PM »
Thank you for checking into this  :tup:

That area is the only reason i apply for that unit and with the amount of people getting discouraged from hoof rot or private land issues I feel like this is the year   8) 8)


Offline Big6bull

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 529
  • Location: Wet side
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #10 on: May 27, 2014, 06:14:16 PM »
Thank you for checking into this  :tup:

That area is the only reason i apply for that unit and with the amount of people getting discouraged from hoof rot or private land issues I feel like this is the year   8) 8)

There's just as much of a hoof rot issue up high as there is down lower  :twocents:

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #11 on: May 27, 2014, 06:24:56 PM »
Thank you for checking into this  :tup:

That area is the only reason i apply for that unit and with the amount of people getting discouraged from hoof rot or private land issues I feel like this is the year   8) 8)

There's just as much of a hoof rot issue up high as there is down lower  :twocents:

I think what he's saying is that with hoof rot being prevalent in the St. Helens area, that less people may have applied for the Margaret permit this year, so his odds of drawing are better this year than in the past.

Offline Big6bull

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 529
  • Location: Wet side
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #12 on: May 27, 2014, 08:31:29 PM »
Thank you for checking into this  :tup:

That area is the only reason i apply for that unit and with the amount of people getting discouraged from hoof rot or private land issues I feel like this is the year   8) 8)

There's just as much of a hoof rot issue up high as there is down lower  :twocents:


I think what he's saying is that with hoof rot being prevalent in the St. Helens area, that less people may have applied for the Margaret permit this year, so his odds of drawing are better this year than in the past.

Thanks I read that differently lol.  I'm in the same boat, and would be ecstatic to draw any bull tag in the area!

Offline Bullkllr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 4924
  • Location: Graham
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2014, 03:29:28 PM »
Thank you for checking into this  :tup:

That area is the only reason i apply for that unit and with the amount of people getting discouraged from hoof rot or private land issues I feel like this is the year   8) 8)

There's just as much of a hoof rot issue up high as there is down lower  :twocents:

I think what he's saying is that with hoof rot being prevalent in the St. Helens area, that less people may have applied for the Margaret permit this year, so his odds of drawing are better this year than in the past.

Looking at last year's reported success rates, I'm thinking the draw odds should be getting better anyway:

  Bull Hunts
Mod. Rut- 100%
Modern- 58%
Archery-50%
Muzz- 23.5%
Total overall = 52%

Antlerless Hunts
Modern- 62%
Archery- 13.5%
Muzz- 18.5%
Dis.- 20%
Total Overall = 38%

I know the unit is unique in some ways, but those  success rates are topped by many other units.
Ain't what it used to be by a long shot.
A Man's Gotta Eat

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3496
  • Location: west coast
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #14 on: May 28, 2014, 04:06:38 PM »
Thank you for checking into this  :tup:

That area is the only reason i apply for that unit and with the amount of people getting discouraged from hoof rot or private land issues I feel like this is the year   8) 8)

There's just as much of a hoof rot issue up high as there is down lower  :twocents:

I think what he's saying is that with hoof rot being prevalent in the St. Helens area, that less people may have applied for the Margaret permit this year, so his odds of drawing are better this year than in the past.

Bingo  :tup: you might run into a random infected elk but for the most part the elk in the area up there are pretty healthy

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Raffle ticket sales 2025 by 6haase6
[Today at 05:25:46 PM]


3 days for Kings by cem3434
[Today at 05:18:20 PM]


Cell cam recommendation for security? by Stein
[Today at 05:01:50 PM]


Looking for Solid 22 LR input by Zardoz
[Today at 04:57:06 PM]


If this is your trap by MADMAX
[Today at 04:40:56 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 03:55:08 PM]


The end? Bird bands. by hdshot
[Today at 03:44:43 PM]


WA Moose scouting by TriggerMike
[Today at 03:15:08 PM]


North Sea Fishing trip by BLH69
[Today at 02:05:14 PM]


2025 Crab! by BLH69
[Today at 02:02:40 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by MMCCAULEY
[Today at 09:25:10 AM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by riflehunter
[Today at 08:03:26 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by CNELK
[Today at 07:31:32 AM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:01:45 AM]


Hunting bears in the thick stuff by J-Bone
[Yesterday at 09:23:26 PM]


Calling in August in Western Washington by J-Bone
[Yesterday at 06:44:50 PM]


How To Get Your $0.00 Tax Stamp - Black Hammer Arms by dreadi
[Yesterday at 06:39:00 PM]


Crabbing at cornet bay? by swanderek
[Yesterday at 06:32:44 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal