collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.  (Read 7437 times)

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #15 on: May 28, 2014, 04:18:13 PM »
The access fee will probably reduce application numbers more than the hoof disease. For me it was the two things put together. I considered paying the $150 for access, but then thought I really don't want to pay and especially don't want to pay to kill a sick elk.

Offline bowhunterty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 530
  • Location: Eastside
  • Hunt Hard or Stay Home!!!
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #16 on: May 28, 2014, 04:55:32 PM »
Last year in the late season never saw any sick elk in the Margaret. Saw some nice bulls also.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #17 on: May 28, 2014, 05:05:16 PM »
The bull I killed up high had hoof rot. I haven't seen many limping elk up there but I watched him for a long time and he never limped so who knows.

I think the low success rates are mostly due to people thinking it's gonna be easy. The Margaret is so grown up now it's not drive around and shoot a big bull like it used to be. There are still a ton of elk and some good bulls in there.



Offline DIYARCHERYJUNKIE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 3106
  • Location: hoodcanal
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #18 on: May 29, 2014, 07:15:20 AM »
Did you eat all the meat?  I'm glad to hear all this after being so discouraged about the hoof rot and access.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #19 on: May 29, 2014, 07:38:42 AM »
Absolutely I did. There was nothing wrong with the meat. I've been a part of killing several elk with hoof rot and none of them had tainted meat.



Offline DIYARCHERYJUNKIE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 3106
  • Location: hoodcanal
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #20 on: May 29, 2014, 08:07:37 AM »
Good to know.  I have never hunted the Helens herd.  I will if drawn.  I will buy the access pass too.  I have a spot I hunt that has a lot of elk I don't really see the need to change areas.  But if the hoof rot and permits displace the crowds I could see my area being very crowded.  So I hope I draw but will probably start out of state next year for elk.  I'll buy a tag for the eastside and put in for archery permits but if not selected I'll hunt out of state.

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #21 on: May 29, 2014, 09:14:08 AM »
FYI
The Forest Service is putting together another Land and Water Conservation Fund grant to purchase the Margaret "high Lakes" area.  It has the backing of the Trust for Public Lands.  If any group would like to offer a letter of support to be enclosed with the grant, please PM me.  I think if you sent one in two years ago (like WFW did Thanks!) it is still good.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #22 on: May 29, 2014, 09:17:57 AM »
Will Agnew be willing to sell? I assumed he had that for his own private hunting area.  Great news if they can make it happen!

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3499
  • Location: west coast
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #23 on: May 29, 2014, 09:29:48 AM »
Will Agnew be willing to sell? I assumed he had that for his own private hunting area.  Great news if they can make it happen!

 :yeah:  :yeah: its not just Agnes tho...theres a few different land owners up there


Online bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #24 on: May 29, 2014, 09:35:01 AM »
FYI
The Forest Service is putting together another Land and Water Conservation Fund grant to purchase the Margaret "high Lakes" area.  It has the backing of the Trust for Public Lands.  If any group would like to offer a letter of support to be enclosed with the grant, please PM me.  I think if you sent one in two years ago (like WFW did Thanks!) it is still good.
We need to get as much land in the public domain in this state as we can.

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #25 on: May 29, 2014, 10:01:19 AM »
We need to get as much land in the public domain in this state as we can.
Communism hasn't been shown to be a success anywhere else it has been tried, not sure why Washington would be different.   :dunno:

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Hunting Pamphlet incorrect about USFS Margaret Closure.
« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2014, 10:07:27 AM »
Will Agnew be willing to sell? I assumed he had that for his own private hunting area.  Great news if they can make it happen!
It's not Agnew, but to the east of him, bordering the Monument, with the lakes and access that could reconnect the old Mt. Margaret Trail system.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Weyerhauser: St Helens - inscrutable? by ljsommer
[Today at 02:32:56 PM]


Anyone use game carts? by MightyWhite
[Today at 02:28:34 PM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by Humptulips
[Today at 01:10:22 PM]


Hunting w/ 30 rd magazine by andrew_in_idaho
[Today at 12:37:25 PM]


Hancock/Manulife........No Trespassing signs everywhere! What's the deal. by hunter399
[Today at 11:36:44 AM]


Flynn’s 1st rooster!!! by Forrestrover
[Today at 11:11:07 AM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by no.cen.wa
[Today at 11:00:20 AM]


NAVY BEAN SOUP by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 10:50:59 AM]


Interview of Greg Jones about wolves by Humptulips
[Today at 10:44:44 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by mikey549
[Today at 10:23:03 AM]


Rabbit guts, feet heads for trapping bait by HighlandLofts
[Today at 10:18:53 AM]


As He Lay by ganghis
[Today at 09:28:02 AM]


Piebald blacktail fawn by highside74
[Today at 09:26:27 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by craigapphunt
[Today at 08:51:58 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by HntnFsh
[Today at 06:46:18 AM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by bearpaw
[Today at 06:17:35 AM]


Big buck, bad eye by 2MANY
[Today at 05:44:31 AM]


Cougar and an elk same pic/video by redi
[Yesterday at 08:52:46 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 07:48:21 PM]


Entiat Modern hunting by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 03:58:02 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal