Free: Contests & Raffles.
Won't these hunting spots be better than ever in a year or two?
Its not mother nature I am worried about it's the WDFW
Yup ya gotta trust in good old Mother Nature for the long term
If deer numbers decline drastically, couldn't we expect that predators would do the same?
What a lot of people don't realize now is the Methow deer herd is a mere shadow of what it used to be. It has continued to decline. Now there is another predator raising it's head, then you throw in the WDFW's proposal to increase doe tags. It's a shame to see this once trophy herd diminished to what it is.
bigmacc, can you remember when the wdfw gave 500 doe tags for unit 224,,, and 500 for each of all the surrounding units? I think 1960's-1970's. We always put in for the tag and wouldn't use it if we were drawn. I also remember talking to a retired wdfw guy at the game range on the Loop Loop, he told me he would bring feed in for the deer to help them make it though the winter. He said there would be 300-400 deer in Shrive Canyon when they migrated down for the winter. I was pretty excited about that till I talked to my grandfather, he had a ranch not far from there, He said "thats too bad" he said he would ride his horse up to Shrive and Peterson Canyons and would lose track of the count when it got over 1000 or so, he said thats sitting still and counting, not moving around! He moved there form Wenatchee in the 1920's, not sure of the year, but he was there to the 1950's How times change! Now thats sad!
Good to hear from some folks that have been there and done that and KNOW. Last spring I saw a whopping 20 deer in that canyon where there used to be 800-1000. The herd is pitiful compared to the past that I know of it and I am not going back as far as you guys. Some of the range that used to have 100's of deer only had what you could count on one or TWO hands this last spring. Quite frankly at these levels, the remaining range might even be enough to sustain the others coming into it. I wonder if the powers to be are almost excited as this is a great excuse to divert off of their wolf catastrophe. Now they can blame the horrible fire of 2014 and the winter afterwards for the demise of the herd. Some of us will know that the hole was already dug and coffin hovereing to be lowered.
One thing I wish I had done,,, before this burn, is spend a few days in my old hunting grounds at the end of October and the first of November, that is when our hunting group would hunt before they shortened the season and threw us all into the same week. We would always hunt the last week of the season, and it always ended after October, or first few days of November, heck I remember Veterans day being the day after the season ended and we had an extra day to pack up camp.I would like to compare the deer now to see how it would compare to the past. I don't think the wdfw will ever extend seasons again, they got $692,000 in 2013 for Quality deer and Buck deer draw tags alone!, thats just those two, not counting the others and the cost of the license. Maybe they could have a draw tag for Wolves, now I'd try that one!OK I'll shutup John G
It will be interesting to get "in the woods" and see how hot the fire got, 20 years ago there was a small fire at the head of Wolf Canyon, east of Lower Beaver Creek Rd. it burned so hot that nothing grew for 10-12 years, there wasn't even a stump left where it was hottest. From what I could see from hiway 20 it wasn't that hot, I only hope most of it wasn't that hot.By the way, although there was no vegetation the deer still moved though, just nothing to stop for! Time will tell
Maybe some of these crucial deer areas can be re-planted and seeded.Aren't the areas that are so incinerated the same areas where the underbrush was too thick? Maybe these areas should of been let naturally burned years ago?
Quote from: singleshot12 on August 21, 2014, 07:44:12 AMMaybe some of these crucial deer areas can be re-planted and seeded.Aren't the areas that are so incinerated the same areas where the underbrush was too thick? Maybe these areas should of been let naturally burned years ago?That's why the Mule Deer Foundation is working in E. WA now more than ever. We will be re-seeding and/or planting different plugs to re-establish forage in many crucial areas. If you ever want to help out, let us know and come out and get some boots on the ground with us!For the burning, we also bought a prescribed burn trailer for WDFW and their "burn boss". In areas they have done prescribed burns like the Sinlahekin, when fires do pop up, they burn very fast and don't do much damage. We are currently looking at purchasing another trailer or two for them, to increase the amount of "preventative prescribed burning", to help avoid some of what has happened in Okanogan, Chelan and Kittitas counties over the last few years. Stay tuned for what else we are up to in Okanogan this fall and winter in helping the deer get through the winter...we're doing our best to provide options that will convince WDFW to drop the proposed extra deer tags. Hopefully we'll see positive results after this winter!
Here's a question: Has anybody heard if the mighty Conservation Northwest has done anything to help in the recovery efforts??
I too remember those times, counting 300-400 on a hillside in a few different canyons. Funny how there were more hunters back then too and yet I seldom saw more than a handful total in a weeks worth of hunting the hills. Some great hunting spots have burned this year, I'm hoping a few more of them are spared.
Quote from: huntnphool on August 20, 2014, 11:48:45 PM I too remember those times, counting 300-400 on a hillside in a few different canyons. Funny how there were more hunters back then too and yet I seldom saw more than a handful total in a weeks worth of hunting the hills. Some great hunting spots have burned this year, I'm hoping a few more of them are spared.I cant hardly believe there were more hunters back then as compared to now, It seems these days the woods are crawling with people.
Quote from: blindluck on August 22, 2014, 07:12:04 AMQuote from: huntnphool on August 20, 2014, 11:48:45 PM I too remember those times, counting 300-400 on a hillside in a few different canyons. Funny how there were more hunters back then too and yet I seldom saw more than a handful total in a weeks worth of hunting the hills. Some great hunting spots have burned this year, I'm hoping a few more of them are spared.I cant hardly believe there were more hunters back then as compared to now, It seems these days the woods are crawling with people.I think that's because there is less land to hunt. Hunters are concentrated into smaller areas
Quote from: singleshot12 on August 22, 2014, 07:52:16 AMQuote from: blindluck on August 22, 2014, 07:12:04 AMQuote from: huntnphool on August 20, 2014, 11:48:45 PM I too remember those times, counting 300-400 on a hillside in a few different canyons. Funny how there were more hunters back then too and yet I seldom saw more than a handful total in a weeks worth of hunting the hills. Some great hunting spots have burned this year, I'm hoping a few more of them are spared.I cant hardly believe there were more hunters back then as compared to now, It seems these days the woods are crawling with people.I think that's because there is less land to hunt. Hunters are concentrated into smaller areas Actually it's because the season has been condensed down to one week, forcing everyone to take the same time off and swarm the land. We used to be able to hunt a weeks time and see a handful of other hunters in the field during our entire hunt. It became exponentially worse after 2004, which is where it's been since. It's about time they considered extending the general season, at least to the 25th.