Free: Contests & Raffles.
I hunt up lone creek ,Is this close?
does anyone have the tally's of confirmed packs to date and locations ?
With only five breeding pairs so far, WA has along ways to go at the rate WDFW confirm.When wolves are delisted and state management fully replaces federal management, FWS has determined that the recovery goal is being maintained when each state (Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming) maintains at least 15 breeding pairs and 150 wolves.
Quote from: idahohuntr on September 16, 2014, 01:45:33 PMQuote from: snowpack on September 16, 2014, 01:33:53 PMSounds like something wolf/eco whackos would do. That kind of surprises me...I guess maybe those ELF groups that firebomb gas guzzlers or something...but I usually don't think of greenies as being all that proficient with firearms.“It’s a fairly remote area, so it’s not going to be an easy task to determine something to do that will help keep wolves and livestock apart,” he said.The surest way to reduce livestock losses from wolves is to not put livestock in wolf habitat. Not saying thats the only option, but at some point don't livestock producers have to factor in predation losses to their business if they continue to operate where wolves occur and are a protected species?[/color]Magic meatballs would keep the wolves and cattle apart. Maybe it's time to change the wolf habitat. I have a few ideas, quite sure you can guess what they are.
Quote from: snowpack on September 16, 2014, 01:33:53 PMSounds like something wolf/eco whackos would do. That kind of surprises me...I guess maybe those ELF groups that firebomb gas guzzlers or something...but I usually don't think of greenies as being all that proficient with firearms.“It’s a fairly remote area, so it’s not going to be an easy task to determine something to do that will help keep wolves and livestock apart,” he said.The surest way to reduce livestock losses from wolves is to not put livestock in wolf habitat. Not saying thats the only option, but at some point don't livestock producers have to factor in predation losses to their business if they continue to operate where wolves occur and are a protected species?[/color]
Sounds like something wolf/eco whackos would do.
About 8 miles south of Canada.
Just assume they are everywhere. Man price of beef is going up, wonder why? These ranchers going to be run into the dirt at this rate. I am sure the local economy will prosper then! Keeps reminding me of the spotted owl crap. idahodude you propose removing open grazing? That would have huge ramifications across the country. Other states without wolves would be closed as well due to some stupid beetle or endangered rodent. Then the large corps. would get involved due to lack of supply and loosing $. Then it would revert back likely. No win and only the people would suffer. Camp I am setting a camera in the grizz territory to see if I get lucky. He wasnt around last year.
no problem with grazing, just saying that at some point livestock producers need to factor in wolf losses as the cost of doing business in wolf country...I doubt it will have any effect on beef prices in the US.
Quote from: idahohuntr on September 16, 2014, 09:13:46 PMno problem with grazing, just saying that at some point livestock producers need to factor in wolf losses as the cost of doing business in wolf country...I doubt it will have any effect on beef prices in the US. I don't always disagree with you Idahohunter, but these folks were running cattle when there were no wolves. Kind of tough to make them factor it in after-the-fact just because people who don't have to live there (but like the thought of wolves in the wild) think it's a good idea to bring wolves back.