I-594 Special Notice from DOR

[jay.sharkbait]

I am sure it would require a background check since they consider a receiver/frame a firearm.

The feds do, but does 594 address it?

interesting.  feds regulate a part, 594 mentions firearm...a receiver doesn't propel a projectile with gunpowder.

Exactly

[Windwalker]

 Hard to keep civil thoughts reading this. Must be getting old and grumpy..
 
Tax Tax Tax -
If $ changes hands- and sometimes even if it doesn't you can bet there will will be a tax owed.
Use tax...? There is no longer any defense against arbitrary taxation.

If it goes through the pipes for registration I am sure it will be tagged for taxes.

[carpsniperg2]

I am sure it would require a background check since they consider a receiver/frame a firearm.

The feds do, but does 594 address it?

interesting.  feds regulate a part, 594 mentions firearm...a receiver doesn't propel a projectile with gunpowder.

Exactly

I see what you are saying.  This is the exact wording on 594:

"Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.

I am sure they would have thought about that but it's not very clear by there definition. I know what the fed's call a firearm. On the state level who knows, maybe the consider it a device used for making a gun?

[jay.sharkbait]

I am sure it would require a background check since they consider a receiver/frame a firearm.

The feds do, but does 594 address it?

interesting.  feds regulate a part, 594 mentions firearm...a receiver doesn't propel a projectile with gunpowder.

Exactly

I see what you are saying.  This is the exact wording on 594:

"Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.

I am sure they would have thought about that but it's not very clear by there definition. I know what the fed's call a firearm. On the state level who knows, maybe the consider it a device used for making a gun?

I don't know if they thought of it.

I know on the Federal level a frame/rec'r falls under a different classification when it comes to FET.

[hrd2fnd]

I recall bigtex stating in another thread that 504 stills applies even if on tribal land