collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: State land logging?  (Read 12723 times)

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38450
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: State land logging?
« Reply #30 on: November 15, 2014, 08:54:03 PM »
So is it only on the east side of the state that the DNR decided to rape the state land?

So this is how the thread starts.  No information, no specifics, just a random rant.  Stir the pot and see what happens.

How do you end up talking about school class sizes and herbicide spray programs based on this statement?  Perhaps he/she was just complaining about feller-buncher tire marks across the clear-cuts.

Woodswalker - that's a lot of big statements without any substantiation.  I'd love to see some data or proof to justify your arguments about big biz and environmental groups.  I agree conservancy groups are trying to grab up some land, but how can that be a bad thing?  Your kids or grandkids will benefit from having that land out of timber production.  Big game needs old growth too.

Regardless of what the original intent of the thread was, I think DNR is doing a pretty good job in satisfying the monetary needs of the state while being pretty good stewards of our public land.  Not perfect, but pretty good.  If it was me, I would spray the herbicide immediately after the cut is done then   require the replanting take place by the next spring.  I could complain endlessly about the alder plantations which require plantings every six feet, then thinning around year six.  The thinning slash is dangerous to big game animals and leaves those 40 -100 acre cut areas almost unusable to wildlife and hunters for another decade, until the slashed alder melts into the ground.  Regardless, I think DNR is doing a pretty good job on minimal funding.

I agree, of all the entities I see logging their lands, I like the DNR forest practices about the best. Logging benefits a lot of wildlife, but I do hope they keep the herbicide spraying to a minimum.
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline csaaphill

  • Anti Hunters are weird animals.
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 9588
  • Hunting is non-negotiable it's what I do!
  • Groups: G.O.A., Rocky Mountain ELk Foundation
Re: State land logging?
« Reply #31 on: November 15, 2014, 09:17:38 PM »
some areas over here could use some selective harvesting.
They planted these pondarosa pines a years ago now you can't walk through without haveing to almost crawl through.
SO ya some selective harvesting would be good.
from what we've found out during the complex and school fire areas that were choked with trees are now pretty open except scrub brush. If they selective harvest then if a fire does break out it doesn't completly clear out the area like it did/does.
"When my bow falls, so shall the world. When me heart ceases to pump blood to my body, it will all come crashing down. As a hunter, we are bound by duty, nay, bound by our very soul to this world. When a hunter dies we feel it, we sense it, and the world trembles with sorrow. When I die, so shall the world, from the shock of loosing such a great part of ones soul." Ezekiel, Okeanos Hunter

Offline fishnfur

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2014
  • Posts: 3805
  • Location: longview
Re: State land logging?
« Reply #32 on: November 15, 2014, 11:09:30 PM »
I could easily be wrong, but I think the DNR is actively managing Eastern WA forests through selective harvests in order to increase spacing between trees to slow the progress of the Mountain Pine Beetle, which has devastated huge pine forests in N. America.  Affected areas ay have been harvested rather than left as standing dead timber.  Wiki link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_pine_beetle
“When I die, I want to die like my grandfather who died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like all the passengers in his car.”  - Will Rogers

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Hoof Rot by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:08:45 AM]


MA-10 Coho by metlhead
[Today at 06:02:06 AM]


Ever win the WDFW Big Game Raffle? by addicted1
[Yesterday at 10:56:29 PM]


Honda BF15A Outboard Problems by Sandberm
[Yesterday at 08:18:08 PM]


Idaho General Season Going to Draw for Nonresidents by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 08:16:36 PM]


Eastern WA-WT hunting from tree stands?? by addicted1
[Yesterday at 06:47:44 PM]


A question for any FFL holders on here by ryan2202
[Yesterday at 05:01:26 PM]


Bow mount trolling motors by BigGoonTuna
[Yesterday at 01:29:55 PM]


I’m on a blacktail mission by addicted1
[Yesterday at 12:10:11 PM]


where is everyone? by nwwanderer
[Yesterday at 06:01:04 AM]


Wolf documentary PBS by Skyvalhunter
[Yesterday at 05:58:56 AM]


Stuffed Pork Chop by EnglishSetter
[June 07, 2025, 11:12:59 PM]


Another great day in the turkey woods. by Remington Outdoors
[June 07, 2025, 09:43:57 PM]


Buck age by kentrek
[June 07, 2025, 08:56:47 PM]


Oregon special tag info by Judespapa
[June 07, 2025, 08:37:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal