Free: Contests & Raffles.
Tough call I've heard a bunch of people saying it should be 2 pt minimum but in my mind that would worsen the genetics and increase yearling spike survival % and decrease the yearling forked bucks survival %Since there are very few big 2's then it would be pretty ineffective to assign permits...particularly because most folks holding those 2x2 only tags would be looking to tip over the first 1.5 yr old buck they saw
Quote from: grundy53 on August 04, 2015, 02:42:35 PMQuote from: Bean Counter on August 04, 2015, 01:43:00 PMThe 4 point minimum seems to have done well in the Northeast corner of WA, why not implement it for the muleys?The 4 minimum on whitetails is basically exactly the same as a three point minimum on mulies. The only difference is that the vast majority of whitetails have eyeguards so they had to add an extra point to the APR. generally a 4 point whitetail is a mainframe 3 point.Sent from my E6782 using TapatalkOne significant difference is I don't think there are any whitetails that top out below 4 pts
Quote from: Bean Counter on August 04, 2015, 01:43:00 PMThe 4 point minimum seems to have done well in the Northeast corner of WA, why not implement it for the muleys?The 4 minimum on whitetails is basically exactly the same as a three point minimum on mulies. The only difference is that the vast majority of whitetails have eyeguards so they had to add an extra point to the APR. generally a 4 point whitetail is a mainframe 3 point.Sent from my E6782 using Tapatalk
The 4 point minimum seems to have done well in the Northeast corner of WA, why not implement it for the muleys?
Quote from: Jonathan_S on August 04, 2015, 03:06:32 PMQuote from: vandeman17 on August 04, 2015, 03:05:11 PMQuote from: bobcat on August 04, 2015, 02:58:17 PMDo deer really care how many points they have? Do the does count points on the bucks when evaluating potential mates? Does it matter that there are mature two point bucks for any reason other than we can't shoot them and if we could they won't score well?I have read a few articles that discussed a topic similar to this and they basically said antler growth is a sign of health as well as gene quality. Besides the hunting aspect, I just don't like the idea of a prolonged antler restriction rule because it eventually will effect the overall make up of the herd. When done in the short term, the effects are minimal at best and should be phased out quickly but the longer you keep the restriction and keep letting the two points walk and breed, the longer term effects it has. I will see if I can find the really good article that I read a while back about this. Does a better job talking about the science and biology behind it.Makes perfect sense but it seems that it would be a slaughter if it were "any buck" I wouldn't go to any buck if it were me, but I would go with at least a limited harvest of some of the two points. The big issue I see is that it opens up the possibility that most of the hunters would instead shoot immature two points that aren't the issue instead of the mature two's as intended.
Quote from: vandeman17 on August 04, 2015, 03:05:11 PMQuote from: bobcat on August 04, 2015, 02:58:17 PMDo deer really care how many points they have? Do the does count points on the bucks when evaluating potential mates? Does it matter that there are mature two point bucks for any reason other than we can't shoot them and if we could they won't score well?I have read a few articles that discussed a topic similar to this and they basically said antler growth is a sign of health as well as gene quality. Besides the hunting aspect, I just don't like the idea of a prolonged antler restriction rule because it eventually will effect the overall make up of the herd. When done in the short term, the effects are minimal at best and should be phased out quickly but the longer you keep the restriction and keep letting the two points walk and breed, the longer term effects it has. I will see if I can find the really good article that I read a while back about this. Does a better job talking about the science and biology behind it.Makes perfect sense but it seems that it would be a slaughter if it were "any buck"
Quote from: bobcat on August 04, 2015, 02:58:17 PMDo deer really care how many points they have? Do the does count points on the bucks when evaluating potential mates? Does it matter that there are mature two point bucks for any reason other than we can't shoot them and if we could they won't score well?I have read a few articles that discussed a topic similar to this and they basically said antler growth is a sign of health as well as gene quality. Besides the hunting aspect, I just don't like the idea of a prolonged antler restriction rule because it eventually will effect the overall make up of the herd. When done in the short term, the effects are minimal at best and should be phased out quickly but the longer you keep the restriction and keep letting the two points walk and breed, the longer term effects it has. I will see if I can find the really good article that I read a while back about this. Does a better job talking about the science and biology behind it.
Do deer really care how many points they have? Do the does count points on the bucks when evaluating potential mates? Does it matter that there are mature two point bucks for any reason other than we can't shoot them and if we could they won't score well?
Quote from: Jonathan_S on August 04, 2015, 02:54:23 PMQuote from: grundy53 on August 04, 2015, 02:42:35 PMQuote from: Bean Counter on August 04, 2015, 01:43:00 PMThe 4 point minimum seems to have done well in the Northeast corner of WA, why not implement it for the muleys?The 4 minimum on whitetails is basically exactly the same as a three point minimum on mulies. The only difference is that the vast majority of whitetails have eyeguards so they had to add an extra point to the APR. generally a 4 point whitetail is a mainframe 3 point.Sent from my E6782 using TapatalkOne significant difference is I don't think there are any whitetails that top out below 4 ptsWhile I agree with you there are mature whitetails that have less than 4 points.Sent from my E6782 using Tapatalk
Quote from: Jonathan_S on August 04, 2015, 03:12:36 PMTough call I've heard a bunch of people saying it should be 2 pt minimum but in my mind that would worsen the genetics and increase yearling spike survival % and decrease the yearling forked bucks survival %Since there are very few big 2's then it would be pretty ineffective to assign permits...particularly because most folks holding those 2x2 only tags would be looking to tip over the first 1.5 yr old buck they sawI see a lot of big 2x2's actually but I agree with you. Maybe it would be a master hunter type hunt with the instructions of holding out for age class... heck I don't know. All I know is that I think something needs to be done to keep from a 2x2 becoming a dominant gene in some areas.
Quote from: vandeman17 on August 04, 2015, 03:15:16 PMQuote from: Jonathan_S on August 04, 2015, 03:12:36 PMTough call I've heard a bunch of people saying it should be 2 pt minimum but in my mind that would worsen the genetics and increase yearling spike survival % and decrease the yearling forked bucks survival %Since there are very few big 2's then it would be pretty ineffective to assign permits...particularly because most folks holding those 2x2 only tags would be looking to tip over the first 1.5 yr old buck they sawI see a lot of big 2x2's actually but I agree with you. Maybe it would be a master hunter type hunt with the instructions of holding out for age class... heck I don't know. All I know is that I think something needs to be done to keep from a 2x2 becoming a dominant gene in some areas. First, is there any proof that this actually is happening? And second, as I said before, why does it matter? Is it only because it's frustrating as a hunter to see a big mature buck that can't be shot because it doesn't have the required number of points? Or is there a biological reason why mature two points are bad?
There actually are permits for 2x2 only mule deer in units 133, 136, 139, and 142.