collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Crazy but I liked the 11-33X50 over the 20-60x65  (Read 3219 times)

Offline fullpipe77

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 63
  • Location: tri cities
Crazy but I liked the 11-33X50 over the 20-60x65
« on: September 04, 2015, 08:17:03 PM »
Like I said was at sportsman and had the Tri pod out that I'm going to buy and decided to set a vortex razor 20-60x65. We took it out side and was looking at a hill 10 miles away.  I could see people and their dogs walking down a trail. I think the problem was the Tri pod but any ways I had It maxed out and was hard to look through with the wables.  Than decided to put on the little spotter 11-33x50. My friend and I were very amazed. That little thing was great. I could still see the hikers and the dogs on the trail. Not as shaky because it was only at 33x. Its so freaking little and light I literly put in my pocket.  For me this thing is the perfect back pack spotter.  You can put it in the glove box. For me this would be perfect. I'm not gonna be looking for deer 10miles away.  I can't say enough that think was awesome.

Offline Crunchy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4944
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: Crazy but I liked the 11-33X50 over the 20-60x65
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2015, 08:27:39 PM »
I have a 20X60X65 and usually start at about 20-25 power until I want a closer look and zoom it in until 40-50.  Then that extra zoom comes in handy.  Im sure yours will do great.

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50270
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Crazy but I liked the 11-33X50 over the 20-60x65
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2015, 08:27:51 PM »
Nobody is going to be looking at deer 10 miles away. Ive been there done that with the little scopes and they're too limiting IMO.

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2

:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

Offline Mark251

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 2608
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Crazy but I liked the 11-33X50 over the 20-60x65
« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2015, 08:41:18 PM »
 I'm looking at the razor 11-33x50 as well.  Jakelope are you thinking its limiting because it tops out at 33x or is there something I'm missing?

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50270
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Crazy but I liked the 11-33X50 over the 20-60x65
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2015, 08:43:42 PM »
I'm looking at the razor 11-33x50 as well.  Jakelope are you thinking its limiting because it tops out at 33x or is there something I'm missing?

Yeah. Probably not the end of the world, but id rather have the extra x's. With that said ive not had the little razor. If you have a big spotter and want a small dedicated backpacking spotter I think you cant go wrong. If you're like me and cant afford multiple spotters then id go for the 20-60x all day.


Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

Offline Mark251

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 2608
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Crazy but I liked the 11-33X50 over the 20-60x65
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2015, 09:06:39 PM »
Makes sense.  Thanks jackelope.

Offline CouesFanatic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 122
Re: Crazy but I liked the 11-33X50 over the 20-60x65
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2015, 11:10:39 PM »
I didn't think Vortex's Razor had a 65 mm scope with a 20-60. I have a 16-48x65 Razor. They do make a 20-60x85.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32895
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Crazy but I liked the 11-33X50 over the 20-60x65
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2015, 11:14:06 PM »
The other obvious issue is you were comparing during retail hours. Where optics show their true colors comparatively is during dawn and dusk hours. :twocents:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Mark251

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 2608
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Crazy but I liked the 11-33X50 over the 20-60x65
« Reply #8 on: September 05, 2015, 11:55:21 AM »
With a smaller 50mm objective lens would the little razor do well during low-light hours? Any ideas?

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39201
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Crazy but I liked the 11-33X50 over the 20-60x65
« Reply #9 on: September 05, 2015, 12:06:56 PM »

With a smaller 50mm objective lens would the little razor do well during low-light hours? Any ideas?

My guess is it would work at 11 power, but if you increase that by much the exit pupil gets too small. Just think of it at 25 power, with the 50mm objective that's an exit pupil of 2mm. At that, there's just not going to be enough light getting through to your eye. Typical binoculars have an exit pupil of 4 to 5 millimeters.


Offline Mark251

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 2608
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Crazy but I liked the 11-33X50 over the 20-60x65
« Reply #10 on: September 05, 2015, 12:15:49 PM »
Makes sense...thanks Bobcat.  Sounds like another good reason to try scopes out in low-light conditions before buying.  I appreciate the help.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

How a Product That Changed Hunting FOREVER was invented in the 1980's by addicted1
[Yesterday at 11:54:19 PM]


Challis/salmon idaho packstrings? by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 10:50:58 PM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:53:08 PM]


Can’t fish for pinks area 8-2? by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 08:56:33 PM]


Norway Pass Bull by Mtnwalker
[Yesterday at 08:07:59 PM]


Dandy Bull by Buckhunter24
[Yesterday at 07:26:58 PM]


Iceberg shrimp closed by Mfowl
[Yesterday at 06:23:25 PM]


New video from Sportsmen's Alliance includes some damning new records from the 4 by Windwalker
[Yesterday at 04:58:45 PM]


That "lake taste" in freshwater fish by Karl Blanchard
[Yesterday at 03:06:00 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by Turner89
[Yesterday at 02:37:16 PM]


Pet Beaver by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 01:24:55 PM]


90's Yamaha no telltale? by Stein
[Yesterday at 01:23:57 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by hunter399
[Yesterday at 01:23:45 PM]


Tricer AD tripod by gee_unit360
[Yesterday at 12:53:24 PM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by geauxtigers
[Yesterday at 12:27:43 PM]


2024 Quality Buck coming home by hunter399
[Yesterday at 06:06:35 AM]


New Bow by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 05:48:23 AM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by EnglishSetter
[June 26, 2025, 11:41:55 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal