collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Long Range Accubond Review  (Read 17594 times)

Offline shootem

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 639
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #60 on: December 29, 2015, 09:34:39 PM »
You must be doing something right BLRman. Pretty impressive.

Offline elkaholic123

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 1845
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Groups: Montana Dirty Dozen,Life member RMEF,NAHC, WSF
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #61 on: December 29, 2015, 09:36:19 PM »
The 129 ABLR going 3400 out of my 26 Nosler did considerable damage to a deer at 120 yrds through both shoulders,dropped in its tracks but needed a follow up.similar damage as the old Ballistic tips did out of my 300WM. I have a box of the 142's to try  :dunno: I know they are designed for long range but you never know what distance you will be shooting.
elkaholic

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10706
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #62 on: December 29, 2015, 09:41:10 PM »
The 129 ABLR going 3400 out of my 26 Nosler did considerable damage to a deer at 120 yrds through both shoulders,dropped in its tracks but needed a follow up.similar damage as the old Ballistic tips did out of my 300WM. I have a box of the 142's to try  :dunno: I know they are designed for long range but you never know what distance you will be shooting.
  I think a lot of bullets would have issues at 3400fps :chuckle: :yike:
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8823
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #63 on: December 29, 2015, 10:02:44 PM »
You must be doing something right BLRman. Pretty impressive.
nothing to do over there except shoot stuff and make babies  :chuckle:
« Last Edit: December 29, 2015, 10:11:25 PM by coachcw »

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10706
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #64 on: December 29, 2015, 10:10:05 PM »
You must be doing something right BLRman. Pretty impressive.
nothing to do over there except shot stuff and make babies  :chuckle:
and I'm done with that baby making stuff!  So it only leaves me with one other option...... :chuckle:
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline buglebuster

  • ELKOHOLIC
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3668
  • Location: yakima
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #65 on: December 29, 2015, 10:15:03 PM »
You must be doing something right BLRman. Pretty impressive.
nothing to do over there except shot stuff and make babies  :chuckle:
and I'm done with that baby making stuff!  So it only leaves me with one other option...... :chuckle:
Says you! If we ask kattie its a different answer  :chuckle:

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10706
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #66 on: December 29, 2015, 10:18:55 PM »
You must be doing something right BLRman. Pretty impressive.
nothing to do over there except shot stuff and make babies  :chuckle:
and I'm done with that baby making stuff!  So it only leaves me with one other option...... :chuckle:
Says you! If we ask kattie its a different answer  :chuckle:
4 dogs.  Yep, 4 dogs should occupy her time nicely :yike:
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline WoodlandShooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 1024
  • Location: neither here nor there
  • Groups: P.H.U.
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #67 on: December 30, 2015, 10:21:03 AM »
This is the info I was going by:

http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/nosler-lr-accubonds-bc-testing-results-137554/

Quote
As you can see, the actual BC's can be quite close; within 1-8% of advertised if they're properly stabilized. If they're not properly stabilized (which you might not know according to groups), the BC can be 10-12% lower than advertised.

The LR AB's are well designed (low drag) bullets. One reality of long/low drag bullets is they typically require faster than conventional twist rates to stabilize. However Nosler doesn't provide recommended 'specialty' twist rates for these bullets (at least not that I could find) so users are left to assume that standard twist rates will work.



For example, the .270 caliber 150 grain LRAB fired from a 1:10" twist 270 Winchester only produced an SG (stability factor) of 1.19 under the conditions of the test. This low stability resulted in a G7 BC of 0.278, which is 12% below the advertised value of .317. Note that groups were good at this stability level. However, in order to achieve the highest BC, you need to generate a stability factor of at least 1.5*. Retesting the bullet in a 1:7" twist 270 Winchester produced an SG of 2.31, and a BC that's 4% higher (0.291).

It's the same story with the 7mm 168 grain. Fired from a 'standard' 1:9" twist 7mm Remington Magnum, the stability factor was 1.33, and the BC was 10% less than advertised. Same bullet fired from a 1:7" twist .284 Winchester produced an SG of 2.19, and a BC that's 4% higher, and within 6% of the advertised BC.

This is accurate!!! I have the 150 LRABS all loaded up, doped and trued all they way to 1300 Yards. I am using a 9 twist barrel and the 0.291 G7 BC is good to go.

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10706
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #68 on: December 30, 2015, 11:38:15 AM »
Glad they are spot on for you.  They weren't for me.  Even with an SG of 2.21.  I've stretched these out to 950 (max for where I shoot).
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Selkirk bull moose. by vandeman17
[Today at 03:52:30 AM]


2025 Deer season/hunter399 by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 03:39:08 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by carpsniperg2
[Yesterday at 11:36:21 PM]


Desert unit 290 October buck hunt by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 10:55:13 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 09:54:25 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by mikey549
[Yesterday at 09:17:05 PM]


2021 bear had been previously shot before I killed him by D-Rock425
[Yesterday at 09:11:38 PM]


Rock creek gone? Next? by D-Rock425
[Yesterday at 09:01:52 PM]


Color phase fox by redi
[Yesterday at 08:58:03 PM]


49 DN Moose Success by Alchase
[Yesterday at 08:47:37 PM]


Selling Pistols and rifles by Tacticalhammer
[Yesterday at 07:02:19 PM]


Possible record bull? by Whitefoot
[Yesterday at 06:32:40 PM]


FS Surbu BFG 50 by Tacticalhammer
[Yesterday at 06:16:20 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by ljsommer
[Yesterday at 04:40:12 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by ljsommer
[Yesterday at 04:38:38 PM]


Late Alta Muzzy by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 03:44:09 PM]


CWD drop off station- What a joke! by Stein
[Yesterday at 03:08:22 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 12:35:52 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by TriggerMike
[Yesterday at 12:04:23 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by cavemann
[Yesterday at 10:11:36 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal