collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries  (Read 18969 times)

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44805
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #30 on: May 13, 2016, 10:31:36 AM »
They absolutely fund several hatcheries around the state. Not sure where you're getting your info, but it's incorrect.
Hydropower mitigation hatcheries - funded almost entirely by BPA.  Tribes are involved and paid to operate many hatcheries - but its not their money.
Again, not true. The Quinault Indians fund a coho hatchery on the QU River. That's just one.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Online HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6221
  • Location: Toledo
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #31 on: May 13, 2016, 10:37:54 AM »
I think it's time to pull the trump card and end all this tribal hunting/fishing rights BS.

 It's time all the tribes across the country assimilate and start living within the same rules/ guidelines as the rest of the Americans.
Really? Who do you suppose is responsible for the hatchery and mitigation programs that kept salmon in the rivers after hydropower?  It wasn't the philanthropy of big business or the state.  It was the tribes.
ehhh...I would argue that was done almost entirely by ratepayer and taxpayer funded federal agencies...to the tune of several billion dollars.  Tribes do not fund those efforts - not that I'm arguing they should be footing the bill for activities they opposed which harmed their treaty trust resources.
Right- I should have been more clear.  My point is that tribes are the reason there are any hatcheries.  They are the reason there was mitigation for the hydropower that wiped out the salmon populations; it wasn't the rate payers or feds being generous, the tribes made that happen.

In some instances.

Offline magnanimous_j

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 8659
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #32 on: May 13, 2016, 10:49:22 AM »
Imagine if they shut it down to everyone including tribes for just 2 years
comments ?

I predict that within our lifetimes, there will be "rest years" where all fishing is suspended to reduce pressure on the runs.

As for this, I think sportsmen and the tribes have been tricked into bickering over the scraps. The oceans are getting depleted at a truly alarming rate. It may be time to stop commercial fishing altogether.

You want seafood? Go get it yourself or buy farmed. There is a reason that you can't buy wild venison at Safeway.

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3604
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #33 on: May 13, 2016, 10:57:51 AM »
They absolutely fund several hatcheries around the state. Not sure where you're getting your info, but it's incorrect.
Hydropower mitigation hatcheries - funded almost entirely by BPA.  Tribes are involved and paid to operate many hatcheries - but its not their money.
Again, not true. The Quinault Indians fund a coho hatchery on the QU River. That's just one.
Follow the money - the funding for the vast majority of all hatcheries in the pacific northwest comes from ratepayers and taxpayers.  Very, very, very little money comes from revenue generated by tribes.  Your example above - notice their website "The hatcheries program pursues grants and outside funding to support its work" "Funds have also been received to improve tribal hatcheries including constructing a salmon return channel... Additional grants funded a formalin delivery egg treatment system..."

They then list both the Pacific Salmon Commission and Salmon Recovery Funding Board as Partners...that's because that's where the money comes from...largely federal programs and dollars. 

This is true for nearly every hatchery in the Northwest - may have tribal involvement - but the money to fund those are not coming from any tribal revenue. 
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32899
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #34 on: May 13, 2016, 11:01:44 AM »
They absolutely fund several hatcheries around the state. Not sure where you're getting your info, but it's incorrect.
Hydropower mitigation hatcheries - funded almost entirely by BPA.  Tribes are involved and paid to operate many hatcheries - but its not their money.
Again, not true. The Quinault Indians fund a coho hatchery on the QU River. That's just one.
Follow the money - the funding for the vast majority of all hatcheries in the pacific northwest comes from ratepayers and taxpayers.  Very, very, very little money comes from revenue generated by tribes.  Your example above - notice their website "The hatcheries program pursues grants and outside funding to support its work" "Funds have also been received to improve tribal hatcheries including constructing a salmon return channel... Additional grants funded a formalin delivery egg treatment system..."

They then list both the Pacific Salmon Commission and Salmon Recovery Funding Board as Partners...that's because that's where the money comes from...largely federal programs and dollars. 

This is true for nearly every hatchery in the Northwest - may have tribal involvement - but the money to fund those are not coming from any tribal revenue.

 +1
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38525
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #35 on: May 13, 2016, 11:07:15 AM »
Imagine if they shut it down to everyone including tribes for just 2 years
comments ?

I predict that within our lifetimes, there will be "rest years" where all fishing is suspended to reduce pressure on the runs.

As for this, I think sportsmen and the tribes have been tricked into bickering over the scraps. The oceans are getting depleted at a truly alarming rate. It may be time to stop commercial fishing altogether.

You want seafood? Go get it yourself or buy farmed. There is a reason that you can't buy wild venison at Safeway.

It's much more complicated than that. Part of the problem are enviros closing hatcheries while at the same time wanting to save runs. They are essentially reducing opportunity for all fishers. Fish farming sounds like an answer for the commercial market but it has it's own problems too. I think the answer is to let all fishers have equal opportunity every year so that nobody gets totally cheated out of opportunity. We were having record runs in recent years, now the enviros are trying to close hatcheries.
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44805
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #36 on: May 13, 2016, 11:10:01 AM »
They absolutely fund several hatcheries around the state. Not sure where you're getting your info, but it's incorrect.
Hydropower mitigation hatcheries - funded almost entirely by BPA.  Tribes are involved and paid to operate many hatcheries - but its not their money.
Again, not true. The Quinault Indians fund a coho hatchery on the QU River. That's just one.
Follow the money - the funding for the vast majority of all hatcheries in the pacific northwest comes from ratepayers and taxpayers.  Very, very, very little money comes from revenue generated by tribes.  Your example above - notice their website "The hatcheries program pursues grants and outside funding to support its work" "Funds have also been received to improve tribal hatcheries including constructing a salmon return channel... Additional grants funded a formalin delivery egg treatment system..."

They then list both the Pacific Salmon Commission and Salmon Recovery Funding Board as Partners...that's because that's where the money comes from...largely federal programs and dollars. 

This is true for nearly every hatchery in the Northwest - may have tribal involvement - but the money to fund those are not coming from any tribal revenue.
You said none. You were wrong. Just once acknowledge an error you've made. Just once.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3604
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #37 on: May 13, 2016, 11:17:13 AM »
They absolutely fund several hatcheries around the state. Not sure where you're getting your info, but it's incorrect.
Hydropower mitigation hatcheries - funded almost entirely by BPA.  Tribes are involved and paid to operate many hatcheries - but its not their money.
Again, not true. The Quinault Indians fund a coho hatchery on the QU River. That's just one.
Follow the money - the funding for the vast majority of all hatcheries in the pacific northwest comes from ratepayers and taxpayers.  Very, very, very little money comes from revenue generated by tribes.  Your example above - notice their website "The hatcheries program pursues grants and outside funding to support its work" "Funds have also been received to improve tribal hatcheries including constructing a salmon return channel... Additional grants funded a formalin delivery egg treatment system..."

They then list both the Pacific Salmon Commission and Salmon Recovery Funding Board as Partners...that's because that's where the money comes from...largely federal programs and dollars. 

This is true for nearly every hatchery in the Northwest - may have tribal involvement - but the money to fund those are not coming from any tribal revenue.
You said none. You were wrong. Just once acknowledge an error you've made. Just once.
:chuckle: I'd love to agree with you...but there's no sense in both of us being wrong! :brew:

 
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32899
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #38 on: May 13, 2016, 11:38:15 AM »
 This whole thing could have/should have been dealt with a few years ago when the tribes were fighting casino taxes.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #39 on: May 13, 2016, 01:23:59 PM »
Funny how this PS closure happened soon after 90% of us already bought our saltwater licences,wonder if we'll get a refund? :rolleyes:.. They better come up with something by 2017 or suffer a major revenue loss. They'll most likely increase our freshwater license though.

Tribes are only human too and want the salmon for themselves. What they do is out of spite mainly. Too bad becuase if we worked together we could create enough salmon for everyone plus some. Another reason they don't want to work with WDFW is becuase like us they don't trust them :twocents:
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

Offline Gringo31

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 5607
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #40 on: May 13, 2016, 01:31:30 PM »
I'm going to say something I've been thinking.


I've been wondering if there more of a battle between WDFW and the tribes than we think.  I look at the Colockum and can't figure out why they are allowing such harvest rates.  Over 500 elk harvested last year and looking to repeat this year.  Then I had this idea...

What if this battle was getting ugly so WDFW is allowing a major reduction in the elk herd, to make things more difficult on the tribes?  Kind of a "work with us or we'll make it harder on you" stance.  Makes me wonder if it is related to the fishing side as well or if I'm just talking crazy talk.....
We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.
-Ronald Reagan

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44805
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #41 on: May 13, 2016, 01:36:18 PM »
It's you, Gringo, so of course it's crazy talk!  :chuckle: But I do believe there's more to this story we're not hearing.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline Gringo31

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 5607
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #42 on: May 13, 2016, 01:41:22 PM »
 :tup:

Just can't help but wonder what bargaining chips one holds.  We work together or what?
We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.
-Ronald Reagan

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32899
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #43 on: May 13, 2016, 04:39:24 PM »
:tup:

Just can't help but wonder what bargaining chips one holds.  We work together or what?

We have the ability to force them to negotiate, just not the balls to do it!
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19635
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Statement from WDFW Director Jim Unsworth on Puget Sound fisheries
« Reply #44 on: May 13, 2016, 04:44:29 PM »
:tup:

Just can't help but wonder what bargaining chips one holds.  We work together or what?

We have the ability to force them to negotiate, just not the balls to do it!
Bingo!!!!!! If I had Bill Gates money, I'd hire a butt load of lawyers and the fight would be on.
“In common with”..... not so much!!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 Montana alternate list by ASHQUACK
[Today at 07:21:44 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by bear
[Today at 07:03:22 AM]


Modified game cart... 🛒 by hunter399
[Today at 06:45:54 AM]


Calling Bears by hunter399
[Today at 06:12:44 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by bustedoldman
[Today at 06:10:08 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by kodiak06
[Today at 05:43:11 AM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by hunter399
[Today at 05:14:41 AM]


Lizard Cam by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 04:48:54 AM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by bearpaw
[Today at 12:53:11 AM]


Pocket Carry by Westside88
[Yesterday at 09:33:35 PM]


2025 Coyotes by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:15:03 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by Yeti419
[Yesterday at 06:11:55 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 02:14:23 PM]


2025 Crab! by Stein
[Yesterday at 01:48:55 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by Kales15
[Yesterday at 01:04:52 PM]


Price on brass? by Magnum_Willys
[Yesterday at 12:18:54 PM]


Utah cow elk hunt by kselkhunter
[Yesterday at 09:03:55 AM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by Sneaky
[Yesterday at 04:09:53 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[July 05, 2025, 11:25:17 PM]


THE ULTIMATE QUAD!!!! by Deer slayer
[July 05, 2025, 10:33:55 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal