Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: pianoman9701 on May 13, 2016, 08:56:02 AMThey absolutely fund several hatcheries around the state. Not sure where you're getting your info, but it's incorrect.Hydropower mitigation hatcheries - funded almost entirely by BPA. Tribes are involved and paid to operate many hatcheries - but its not their money.
They absolutely fund several hatcheries around the state. Not sure where you're getting your info, but it's incorrect.
Quote from: idahohuntr on May 13, 2016, 08:52:31 AMQuote from: WAcoyotehunter on May 13, 2016, 08:28:48 AMQuote from: huntnphool on May 12, 2016, 10:24:34 PM I think it's time to pull the trump card and end all this tribal hunting/fishing rights BS. It's time all the tribes across the country assimilate and start living within the same rules/ guidelines as the rest of the Americans.Really? Who do you suppose is responsible for the hatchery and mitigation programs that kept salmon in the rivers after hydropower? It wasn't the philanthropy of big business or the state. It was the tribes.ehhh...I would argue that was done almost entirely by ratepayer and taxpayer funded federal agencies...to the tune of several billion dollars. Tribes do not fund those efforts - not that I'm arguing they should be footing the bill for activities they opposed which harmed their treaty trust resources.Right- I should have been more clear. My point is that tribes are the reason there are any hatcheries. They are the reason there was mitigation for the hydropower that wiped out the salmon populations; it wasn't the rate payers or feds being generous, the tribes made that happen.
Quote from: WAcoyotehunter on May 13, 2016, 08:28:48 AMQuote from: huntnphool on May 12, 2016, 10:24:34 PM I think it's time to pull the trump card and end all this tribal hunting/fishing rights BS. It's time all the tribes across the country assimilate and start living within the same rules/ guidelines as the rest of the Americans.Really? Who do you suppose is responsible for the hatchery and mitigation programs that kept salmon in the rivers after hydropower? It wasn't the philanthropy of big business or the state. It was the tribes.ehhh...I would argue that was done almost entirely by ratepayer and taxpayer funded federal agencies...to the tune of several billion dollars. Tribes do not fund those efforts - not that I'm arguing they should be footing the bill for activities they opposed which harmed their treaty trust resources.
Quote from: huntnphool on May 12, 2016, 10:24:34 PM I think it's time to pull the trump card and end all this tribal hunting/fishing rights BS. It's time all the tribes across the country assimilate and start living within the same rules/ guidelines as the rest of the Americans.Really? Who do you suppose is responsible for the hatchery and mitigation programs that kept salmon in the rivers after hydropower? It wasn't the philanthropy of big business or the state. It was the tribes.
I think it's time to pull the trump card and end all this tribal hunting/fishing rights BS. It's time all the tribes across the country assimilate and start living within the same rules/ guidelines as the rest of the Americans.
Imagine if they shut it down to everyone including tribes for just 2 yearscomments ?
Quote from: idahohuntr on May 13, 2016, 09:50:37 AMQuote from: pianoman9701 on May 13, 2016, 08:56:02 AMThey absolutely fund several hatcheries around the state. Not sure where you're getting your info, but it's incorrect.Hydropower mitigation hatcheries - funded almost entirely by BPA. Tribes are involved and paid to operate many hatcheries - but its not their money.Again, not true. The Quinault Indians fund a coho hatchery on the QU River. That's just one.
Quote from: pianoman9701 on May 13, 2016, 10:31:36 AMQuote from: idahohuntr on May 13, 2016, 09:50:37 AMQuote from: pianoman9701 on May 13, 2016, 08:56:02 AMThey absolutely fund several hatcheries around the state. Not sure where you're getting your info, but it's incorrect.Hydropower mitigation hatcheries - funded almost entirely by BPA. Tribes are involved and paid to operate many hatcheries - but its not their money.Again, not true. The Quinault Indians fund a coho hatchery on the QU River. That's just one.Follow the money - the funding for the vast majority of all hatcheries in the pacific northwest comes from ratepayers and taxpayers. Very, very, very little money comes from revenue generated by tribes. Your example above - notice their website "The hatcheries program pursues grants and outside funding to support its work" "Funds have also been received to improve tribal hatcheries including constructing a salmon return channel... Additional grants funded a formalin delivery egg treatment system..."They then list both the Pacific Salmon Commission and Salmon Recovery Funding Board as Partners...that's because that's where the money comes from...largely federal programs and dollars. This is true for nearly every hatchery in the Northwest - may have tribal involvement - but the money to fund those are not coming from any tribal revenue.
Quote from: MADMAX on May 13, 2016, 08:27:56 AMImagine if they shut it down to everyone including tribes for just 2 yearscomments ?I predict that within our lifetimes, there will be "rest years" where all fishing is suspended to reduce pressure on the runs.As for this, I think sportsmen and the tribes have been tricked into bickering over the scraps. The oceans are getting depleted at a truly alarming rate. It may be time to stop commercial fishing altogether. You want seafood? Go get it yourself or buy farmed. There is a reason that you can't buy wild venison at Safeway.
Quote from: idahohuntr on May 13, 2016, 10:57:51 AMQuote from: pianoman9701 on May 13, 2016, 10:31:36 AMQuote from: idahohuntr on May 13, 2016, 09:50:37 AMQuote from: pianoman9701 on May 13, 2016, 08:56:02 AMThey absolutely fund several hatcheries around the state. Not sure where you're getting your info, but it's incorrect.Hydropower mitigation hatcheries - funded almost entirely by BPA. Tribes are involved and paid to operate many hatcheries - but its not their money.Again, not true. The Quinault Indians fund a coho hatchery on the QU River. That's just one.Follow the money - the funding for the vast majority of all hatcheries in the pacific northwest comes from ratepayers and taxpayers. Very, very, very little money comes from revenue generated by tribes. Your example above - notice their website "The hatcheries program pursues grants and outside funding to support its work" "Funds have also been received to improve tribal hatcheries including constructing a salmon return channel... Additional grants funded a formalin delivery egg treatment system..."They then list both the Pacific Salmon Commission and Salmon Recovery Funding Board as Partners...that's because that's where the money comes from...largely federal programs and dollars. This is true for nearly every hatchery in the Northwest - may have tribal involvement - but the money to fund those are not coming from any tribal revenue. You said none. You were wrong. Just once acknowledge an error you've made. Just once.
Just can't help but wonder what bargaining chips one holds. We work together or what?
Quote from: Gringo31 on May 13, 2016, 01:41:22 PM Just can't help but wonder what bargaining chips one holds. We work together or what?We have the ability to force them to negotiate, just not the balls to do it!