collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Puyallup river closed for the year  (Read 8060 times)

Offline stickman999

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 46
  • Location: Bonney Lake
  • Groups: RMEF sustaining member
Puyallup river closed for the year
« on: May 27, 2016, 07:10:37 AM »
I just read in the Tacoma News Tribune that the Puyallup river is closed to fishing for the year. You can bet it will be corked off by the Indians though. I am happy I didn't waste my cash on a license this year. This state has become a joke with our WDFW caving to the tribes. Glad I'm heaxed to Alaska next month.

Online Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 15999
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2016, 07:14:38 AM »
I hadn't seen that yet.  I did get an email that they had reached an agreement on salmon fishing.

Let me just remind everyone that this is a heated subject and right now it is in the fishing section not off topics.  Please remember to follow forum rules, it makes our high paying jobs easier.  :chuckle:

Carry on.
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline mud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 35
  • Location: Kapowsin/Graham
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2016, 07:50:57 AM »
Nisqually closed Sept and Oct. while Puyallup remains closed all season. 

Offline krout81

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 629
  • Location: Tacoma, Washington
Flinging Arrows with Thunderhead 125's since 1992 
Why Change now?

Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #4 on: May 27, 2016, 08:56:54 AM »
Makes me sick to my stomach that in 2016 this is still considered okay to give privileges to one race over another. It should be closed to EVERYONE!!!  :twocents:

Offline Derailed

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 103
  • Location: Bremerton
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #5 on: May 27, 2016, 02:16:10 PM »
 :bash:
"A lie doesn't become truth, wrong doesn't become right and evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by a majority."
Unknown

Offline Alchase

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 20344
  • Location: Tinker AFB, OK
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #6 on: May 27, 2016, 02:27:45 PM »
http://wdfw.wa.gov/fishing/northfalcon/

Does not sound like an agreement when only one side has all the closures!
Only 2 defining forces sacrificed themselves for you:
The American Soldier and Jesus Christ. One died for your freedom, the other for your soul.

My rock,
He trains my hands for war and my fingers for battle.
Psalm 144.1

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14545
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #7 on: May 27, 2016, 02:31:51 PM »
The state's 50% is being caught in the saltwater. (supposed reason)

Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #8 on: May 27, 2016, 02:33:06 PM »
http://wdfw.wa.gov/fishing/northfalcon/

Does not sound like an agreement when only one side has all the closures!

Exactly! what was being negotiated? how much money the WDFW was going to receive from the tribe? Doesn't seem like much of a negotiation. Seems like the tribes said "we are going to do whatever we want" and WDFW said "okay"

Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #9 on: May 27, 2016, 02:34:43 PM »
The state's 50% is being caught in the saltwater. (supposed reason)

huh, Does 50% of salmon fisherman fish saltwater only? If not, Did they up the limits for those that do?

Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #10 on: May 27, 2016, 02:37:16 PM »
The state's 50% is being caught in the saltwater. (supposed reason)

I don't fish the saltwater. Where is my 50% that I already paid for?

Not asking you specifically JimmyHoffa. Just sayin. this sucks.

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14545
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #11 on: May 27, 2016, 02:51:36 PM »
The state's 50% is being caught in the saltwater. (supposed reason)

I don't fish the saltwater. Where is my 50% that I already paid for?

Not asking you specifically JimmyHoffa. Just sayin. this sucks.
If they were to go for the 50% in the river, then they would have to close all the saltwater.  I guess they think that the half caught in the sound will happen so fast they can't open river, no under quota from the salt?  I think that was the trade off with WDFW to open up the sound.
I don't get to the saltwater anymore either, and with the nets almost pointless to go to the river half the week.

Offline fish vacuum

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 2227
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #12 on: May 27, 2016, 03:25:02 PM »
The state's 50% is being caught in the saltwater. (supposed reason)

I don't fish the saltwater. Where is my 50% that I already paid for?

Not asking you specifically JimmyHoffa. Just sayin. this sucks.
If there's any non tribal commercial coho fishery, that will count against your 50% too. Maybe you can buy one of "your" fish.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk


Offline 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 5499
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #13 on: May 27, 2016, 03:29:06 PM »
You guys have to remember, WDFW is not caving to the tribes. The tribes will do whatever they want because they have Federal backing. The state (us and WDFW) get what's left basically. The state has no say in what the Indians do.
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #14 on: May 27, 2016, 03:39:49 PM »
You guys have to remember, WDFW is not caving to the tribes. The tribes will do whatever they want because they have Federal backing. The state (us and WDFW) get what's left basically. The state has no say in what the Indians do.

If they have no say, Then what are the negotiations for?

Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #15 on: May 27, 2016, 03:42:11 PM »
The state's 50% is being caught in the saltwater. (supposed reason)

I don't fish the saltwater. Where is my 50% that I already paid for?

Not asking you specifically JimmyHoffa. Just sayin. this sucks.
If there's any non tribal commercial coho fishery, that will count against your 50% too. Maybe you can buy one of "your" fish.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

Are there commercial coho fisherys on the Puyallup River? I want to catch the fish I paid for on the river next to my house. If that river doesn't have enough fish. then that is fine. KNOWONE should be able to fish it.

Offline fish vacuum

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 2227
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #16 on: May 27, 2016, 03:46:00 PM »
Puyallup fish are caught in recreational and commercial fisheries in the salt. Those caught in the salt still count as Puyallup river fish.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk


Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #17 on: May 27, 2016, 03:47:13 PM »
You guys have to remember, WDFW is not caving to the tribes. The tribes will do whatever they want because they have Federal backing. The state (us and WDFW) get what's left basically. The state has no say in what the Indians do.

If they have no say, Then what are the negotiations for?

fyi, Not trying to be an ass. These are serious questions. I know im not the most knowledgeable but this seems so wrong to me. What did the tribes give up for the slow coho run this year? Cause they are still going to slaughter them in the Puyallup. We know that much.

Offline chester

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1797
  • Location: Western WA
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #18 on: May 27, 2016, 03:48:24 PM »
Who has a commercial fishery in puget sound? State or tribes? Or both?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Dilligaf

Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #19 on: May 27, 2016, 03:49:26 PM »
Puyallup fish are caught in recreational and commercial fisheries in the salt. Those caught in the salt still count as Puyallup river fish.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

Do the tribes not catch any Puyallup river fish in the salt sense they are fishing the river?

Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #20 on: May 27, 2016, 03:52:57 PM »
The state's 50% is being caught in the saltwater. (supposed reason)

I don't fish the saltwater. Where is my 50% that I already paid for?

Not asking you specifically JimmyHoffa. Just sayin. this sucks.
If there's any non tribal commercial coho fishery, that will count against your 50% too. Maybe you can buy one of "your" fish.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

Oh yeah, Already paid for "my" fish with my fishing license. Not going to pay for it again at the store.

Offline fish vacuum

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 2227
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #21 on: May 27, 2016, 04:08:21 PM »
Who has a commercial fishery in puget sound? State or tribes? Or both?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Normally, it's both. I don't know what their seasons will be this year with the low projections.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk


Offline BigGoonTuna

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 2418
  • Location: Yelm
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #22 on: May 27, 2016, 04:40:36 PM »
we really need to eliminate the commercial fishing mandate in this state.  the tribes can more than fill the need that the cowboys currently take from the recreational anglers.

in years of low returns, rivers need to make escapement before fisheries in the salt(mixed stock) are conducted.  that way we can allow more opportunity in rivers with good numbers and less in areas with less.  however, the boat manufacturers and charter industry have a lot of say in the process and WDFW will not sacrifice the ocean fisheries for the sake of the good of the fish.
you can still get gas in heaven, and a drink in kingdom come,
in the meantime, i'll be cleaning my gun

Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #23 on: May 27, 2016, 05:48:14 PM »
we really need to eliminate the commercial fishing mandate in this state.  the tribes can more than fill the need that the cowboys currently take from the recreational anglers.

in years of low returns, rivers need to make escapement before fisheries in the salt(mixed stock) are conducted.  that way we can allow more opportunity in rivers with good numbers and less in areas with less.  however, the boat manufacturers and charter industry have a lot of say in the process and WDFW will not sacrifice the ocean fisheries for the sake of the good of the fish.
agreed.

Offline SteelheadTed

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2014
  • Posts: 414
  • Location: Wandering Southerly
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #24 on: June 01, 2016, 05:59:03 PM »
Puyallup fish are caught in recreational and commercial fisheries in the salt. Those caught in the salt still count as Puyallup river fish.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

Do the tribes not catch any Puyallup river fish in the salt sense they are fishing the river?

The Puyallup tribe only fishes in river.  That is the case with many but not all tribes.  Part of the reason the seasons this year are what they are is that some tribes can only catch in river fish, so, in order to allow them the 50% they get per the Boldt decision, some rivers are closed to rec guys since they had their shot at the fish in the salt and the tribe didn't (it isn't quite this simple everywhere but on the Puyallup it is nearly that simple).  What this fails to account for though is not all rec guys can fish in the salt, that is a considerably more expensive proposition.  So, this further disadvantages the fisherman with little disposable income.  With the likes of the Green, Puyallup, Nisqually and Skokomish rivers shut down in September and October and the Puyallup all season, there is hundreds, if not thousands of fisherman that will have to make alternate plans or just not fish. 

This is what happens when there aren't enough fish for everyone and it sucks.  My biggest fear is that we won't get some of these fisheries back next year...
« Last Edit: June 01, 2016, 06:04:51 PM by SteelheadTed »
I know I've lost it, let me know if you come across it

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19633
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #25 on: June 01, 2016, 07:00:41 PM »
This whole mess is a crap sandwich, and only the non natives have to take a bite! The natives are loving this you can guarantee that.
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline Alchase

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 20344
  • Location: Tinker AFB, OK
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #26 on: June 02, 2016, 06:29:40 PM »
So who is it that sets gill nets every year in the middle of the ferry routes in Eliot Bay?
The tribes fish all over Puget Sound.
Only 2 defining forces sacrificed themselves for you:
The American Soldier and Jesus Christ. One died for your freedom, the other for your soul.

My rock,
He trains my hands for war and my fingers for battle.
Psalm 144.1

Offline SteelheadTed

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2014
  • Posts: 414
  • Location: Wandering Southerly
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #27 on: June 02, 2016, 06:38:37 PM »
So who is it that sets gill nets every year in the middle of the ferry routes in Eliot Bay?
The tribes fish all over Puget Sound.

Could be Muckleshoots or commercial boats, depends on where they were, there is a portion only the tribe can fish.
I know I've lost it, let me know if you come across it

Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #28 on: June 02, 2016, 07:40:27 PM »
This whole mess is a crap sandwich, and only the non natives have to take a bite! The natives are loving this you can guarantee that.
:yeah:

Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/
Re: Puyallup river closed for the year
« Reply #29 on: June 02, 2016, 07:42:02 PM »
Puyallup fish are caught in recreational and commercial fisheries in the salt. Those caught in the salt still count as Puyallup river fish.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

Do the tribes not catch any Puyallup river fish in the salt sense they are fishing the river?

The Puyallup tribe only fishes in river.  That is the case with many but not all tribes.  Part of the reason the seasons this year are what they are is that some tribes can only catch in river fish, so, in order to allow them the 50% they get per the Boldt decision, some rivers are closed to rec guys since they had their shot at the fish in the salt and the tribe didn't (it isn't quite this simple everywhere but on the Puyallup it is nearly that simple).  What this fails to account for though is not all rec guys can fish in the salt, that is a considerably more expensive proposition.  So, this further disadvantages the fisherman with little disposable income.  With the likes of the Green, Puyallup, Nisqually and Skokomish rivers shut down in September and October and the Puyallup all season, there is hundreds, if not thousands of fisherman that will have to make alternate plans or just not fish. 

This is what happens when there aren't enough fish for everyone and it sucks.  My biggest fear is that we won't get some of these fisheries back next year...
i did not know that first part. Thanks for the clarification. I am also worried we won't get it back.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 07:59:50 PM]


Sockeye Numbers by The Butcher
[Today at 07:54:34 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 07:27:02 PM]


3 pintails by Dan-o
[Today at 07:20:12 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Today at 05:42:19 PM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by Alan K
[Today at 03:46:09 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Buckhunter24
[Today at 12:43:12 PM]


2025 Crab! by trophyhunt
[Today at 11:09:27 AM]


erronulvin trail cam photos by kodiak06
[Today at 10:19:35 AM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Today at 09:55:24 AM]


If you've been following.... by HighlandLofts
[Today at 03:03:24 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal