collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens  (Read 2838 times)

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« on: June 09, 2016, 08:41:44 AM »


http://tdn.com/lifestyles/wdfw-hopes-to-expand-wildlife-area-in-toutle-river-valley/article_7290a6cc-1eb2-5d79-a172-324873018d59.html

 Some of this transaction has been discussed before, but it is a long process.  One big issue is the 7,000 WDFW St. Helens Wildlife area has NO legal public access and no public use easements.  So this public land is completely at the mercy of Weyerhaeuser.  In one place 180 FEET separates the wildlife area with the highway!   The public land can't apply for recreation grants because it has no legal access. 

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25064
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2016, 09:32:20 AM »
What I want to know is why does the state grant acess across its lands for private companies like wh if they dont?
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Dhoey07

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3355
  • Location: Parts Unknown
    • No Facebook for this guy
Re: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2016, 09:36:14 AM »
So why do they need a 10 million dollar acquisition?  Why don't they purchase a 100' strip for access?

Offline headshot5

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 1398
  • Location: Port Orchard, WA
Re: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2016, 10:38:59 AM »
Quote
What I want to know is why does the state grant access across its lands for private companies like wh if they dont?

They do, that's how the state logs landlocked land behind locked WH gates.  Generally access is written in for Fire patrols/Fire Fighting, and for logging/maintenance. 

It isn't however generally written in for public access.   

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25064
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2016, 11:13:22 AM »
It should be
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Mudman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 7347
  • Location: Wetside rock garden.
  • Get R Done.
Re: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2016, 11:51:19 AM »
Wow, I do wish they could get this done but cant help being angry that weyco has been allowed to restrict access to public land.  They really have their way with this state.  More so than the Gov. or people.  Cake and Ice Cream too!  High lakes area appeals to me a lot.  However this would all be special permit draws so State could collect revenue thus restricting access to hunters.  Back to square one. 
MAGA!  Again..

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2016, 01:08:36 PM »
So why do they need a 10 million dollar acquisition?  Why don't they purchase a 100' strip for access?

That might happen--the strip would secure a place for an access trail and has an existing road to near the sediment dam, but the main block of the "mudflow" is via the 3100 which is further up the valley past Hoffstadt bridge.  I think the state is starting with the whole enchilada, and will end up working backward to something smaller, like the strip plus maybe a public use easement on the 3100.  They could do conservation easements with public access on the rest if the dollars for purchase are too much. 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

MOA or MRAD, & Why? by Magnum_Willys
[Today at 09:57:59 PM]


Swakane by full choke
[Today at 09:48:04 PM]


Pics from this year 2025 by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 09:36:06 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by jstone
[Today at 09:14:54 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Crunchy
[Today at 08:12:33 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by TeacherMan
[Today at 07:38:11 PM]


Trap Check Time by TeacherMan
[Today at 07:33:16 PM]


Lion Down - the Savor of Success by IdeehoT
[Today at 07:33:01 PM]


Dodge 48re transmission recommendations by 92xj
[Today at 06:19:32 PM]


Crazy looking Deer by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 06:10:52 PM]


"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 05:31:47 PM]


In the background by boneaddict
[Today at 03:49:49 PM]


Leopard Cur Pups by teanawayslayer
[Today at 11:05:27 AM]


Smelt ? by Trapper John
[Today at 10:41:03 AM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by Dan-o
[Today at 10:26:27 AM]


Jim Horn's elk calling, instructional audio CD's. by WapitiTalk1
[Today at 10:06:23 AM]


Long Range Steel Choke by Elmer Fletch
[Today at 06:10:11 AM]


West side antler buyers by addicted1
[Yesterday at 10:19:05 PM]


Is it a conflict of interest by bbarnes
[Yesterday at 08:54:11 PM]


Shotgun Sight help by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 08:38:11 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal