collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: *censored* outfitters  (Read 49184 times)

Offline Taco280AI

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 2961
  • Location: FL350
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #15 on: May 29, 2017, 05:39:00 PM »
Looks like the mods have struck, without giving explanation  :chuckle:

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #16 on: May 29, 2017, 05:54:34 PM »
i think it was explained last time it came up.the outfit in question made it clear with their intent to sue the forum or members for slander. Bearpaw asked that their names did not come up.he is still a member on the forum i think.
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline emac

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1737
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #17 on: May 29, 2017, 05:58:32 PM »
How is it slander by just bringing up the outfitters name.  I didnt say anything bad about them i just said keep him over on the west side

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


Offline Stalkin Prey

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2016
  • Posts: 229
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #18 on: May 29, 2017, 06:02:14 PM »
They're simply staying out of it in my opinion. These days everyone is sue happy and no one wants to end up in a long drawn out case.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline emac

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1737
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #19 on: May 29, 2017, 07:26:03 PM »
If they are staying out of it why did the change the title of it

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #20 on: May 29, 2017, 07:29:39 PM »
Really?Because you put a name in it that's why.
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9286
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #21 on: May 29, 2017, 07:33:34 PM »
Emac has said absolutely nothing against the outfitter. He's concerned with more land getting swallowed up.
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

Offline 1972Pinto

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2017
  • Posts: 27
  • Location: Spokane Washington
  • Groups: NRA
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #22 on: May 29, 2017, 07:34:41 PM »
Sorry to mix chemicals guys, being new to the forum I didn't know I was striking a nerve  :sry:

Offline emac

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1737
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #23 on: May 29, 2017, 07:35:21 PM »
Really?Because you put a name in it that's why.
And whats wrong with putting a name. People do it all the time. The name has been put on this forum numerous times.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #24 on: May 29, 2017, 07:40:40 PM »
ok ill just leave it up to the owner of the forum.you asked i answered what i thought,you dont like the answer so
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8870
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #25 on: May 29, 2017, 07:45:11 PM »
Where abouts is this 300 acre ,is it next to public land you hunt.Can't really stop anybody from hunting on there own land .

Offline emac

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1737
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2017, 08:04:57 PM »
ok ill just leave it up to the owner of the forum.you asked i answered what i thought,you dont like the answer so
Oh mah. I am on this forum frequently and know you like to stir stuff up. I am not going to bite. So go back to your other threads

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Offline emac

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1737
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #27 on: May 29, 2017, 08:06:12 PM »
Where abouts is this 300 acre ,is it next to public land you hunt.Can't really stop anybody from hunting on there own land .
Completely surrounded by private ground. Actually land locked by other land owners. Will have to get an easement

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


Offline jay.sharkbait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 6507
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #28 on: May 29, 2017, 08:10:51 PM »
So i have read all the post about theses guys throughout the years. Would you guys please keep them on the westside. I just got word brian is leasing to own 300 acres in my next of the woods and from what i have read on this forum we dont need him in our neck of the woods.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Why don't you approach the landowner and offer to buy?

Offline emac

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1737
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #29 on: May 29, 2017, 08:22:16 PM »
So i have read all the post about theses guys throughout the years. Would you guys please keep them on the westside. I just got word brian is leasing to own 300 acres in my next of the woods and from what i have read on this forum we dont need him in our neck of the woods.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Why don't you approach the landowner and offer to buy?
I dont need to buy the land and i wouldnt pay what he is paying for it.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho on the verge of outlawing by spin05
[Yesterday at 11:15:21 PM]


WHAT DID YOUR TRUCK COST NEW? by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 10:16:50 PM]


Hunting with a suppressor - dumb idea? by Antlershed
[Yesterday at 09:25:33 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by fishngamereaper
[Yesterday at 09:22:41 PM]


Roadless Rule Public Comment by addicted1
[Yesterday at 09:22:08 PM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by lonedave
[Yesterday at 09:13:58 PM]


Curious Kitty by Bearhunter308
[Yesterday at 08:46:06 PM]


Goose hunting in Spokane by Pomdale
[Yesterday at 08:34:54 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by Birdguy
[Yesterday at 08:29:13 PM]


Smoked salmon by CaNINE
[Yesterday at 08:22:01 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 06:58:25 PM]


Talking About Barely Legal by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 06:48:19 PM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 05:55:51 PM]


2021 bear had been previously shot before I killed him by cjjcb
[Yesterday at 05:55:10 PM]


.45 kentucky rifle and patched roundballs by TitusFord
[Yesterday at 05:31:48 PM]


Selkirk GMU 113 Moose by vandeman17
[Yesterday at 04:42:53 PM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by Machias
[Yesterday at 11:56:18 AM]


Aladdin unit 111 mule deer quality tag by Ridgerunner
[Yesterday at 11:41:42 AM]


Boring & relining .22 barrel, any recommendations? by Blacktail Sniper
[Yesterday at 10:12:06 AM]


Sitka Beanie's and WS Jetstream gloves on sale by TheYoungSelfStarter
[Yesterday at 09:16:07 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal