collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: *censored* outfitters  (Read 51374 times)

Offline Taco280AI

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 2937
  • Location: FL350
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #15 on: May 29, 2017, 05:39:00 PM »
Looks like the mods have struck, without giving explanation  :chuckle:

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6613
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #16 on: May 29, 2017, 05:54:34 PM »
i think it was explained last time it came up.the outfit in question made it clear with their intent to sue the forum or members for slander. Bearpaw asked that their names did not come up.he is still a member on the forum i think.
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline emac

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1724
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #17 on: May 29, 2017, 05:58:32 PM »
How is it slander by just bringing up the outfitters name.  I didnt say anything bad about them i just said keep him over on the west side

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


Offline Stalkin Prey

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2016
  • Posts: 229
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #18 on: May 29, 2017, 06:02:14 PM »
They're simply staying out of it in my opinion. These days everyone is sue happy and no one wants to end up in a long drawn out case.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline emac

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1724
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #19 on: May 29, 2017, 07:26:03 PM »
If they are staying out of it why did the change the title of it

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6613
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #20 on: May 29, 2017, 07:29:39 PM »
Really?Because you put a name in it that's why.
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9293
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #21 on: May 29, 2017, 07:33:34 PM »
Emac has said absolutely nothing against the outfitter. He's concerned with more land getting swallowed up.
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

Offline 1972Pinto

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2017
  • Posts: 27
  • Location: Spokane Washington
  • Groups: NRA
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #22 on: May 29, 2017, 07:34:41 PM »
Sorry to mix chemicals guys, being new to the forum I didn't know I was striking a nerve  :sry:

Offline emac

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1724
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #23 on: May 29, 2017, 07:35:21 PM »
Really?Because you put a name in it that's why.
And whats wrong with putting a name. People do it all the time. The name has been put on this forum numerous times.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6613
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #24 on: May 29, 2017, 07:40:40 PM »
ok ill just leave it up to the owner of the forum.you asked i answered what i thought,you dont like the answer so
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9079
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #25 on: May 29, 2017, 07:45:11 PM »
Where abouts is this 300 acre ,is it next to public land you hunt.Can't really stop anybody from hunting on there own land .

Offline emac

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1724
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2017, 08:04:57 PM »
ok ill just leave it up to the owner of the forum.you asked i answered what i thought,you dont like the answer so
Oh mah. I am on this forum frequently and know you like to stir stuff up. I am not going to bite. So go back to your other threads

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Offline emac

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1724
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #27 on: May 29, 2017, 08:06:12 PM »
Where abouts is this 300 acre ,is it next to public land you hunt.Can't really stop anybody from hunting on there own land .
Completely surrounded by private ground. Actually land locked by other land owners. Will have to get an easement

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


Offline jay.sharkbait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 6482
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #28 on: May 29, 2017, 08:10:51 PM »
So i have read all the post about theses guys throughout the years. Would you guys please keep them on the westside. I just got word brian is leasing to own 300 acres in my next of the woods and from what i have read on this forum we dont need him in our neck of the woods.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Why don't you approach the landowner and offer to buy?

Offline emac

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1724
Re: *censored* outfitters
« Reply #29 on: May 29, 2017, 08:22:16 PM »
So i have read all the post about theses guys throughout the years. Would you guys please keep them on the westside. I just got word brian is leasing to own 300 acres in my next of the woods and from what i have read on this forum we dont need him in our neck of the woods.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Why don't you approach the landowner and offer to buy?
I dont need to buy the land and i wouldnt pay what he is paying for it.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

HIGH HUNT DUMB QUESTION by Chet43
[Today at 01:39:45 PM]


Spring bear 2026 by GeoSwan
[Today at 01:32:14 PM]


Free Speech and standing up for WA hunters and Sportsmen by GeoSwan
[Today at 01:25:37 PM]


Yellow/red lab puppies by flinger
[Today at 12:59:50 PM]


Turkey Fan/beard Plaques by fire*guy
[Today at 11:36:21 AM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by cavemann
[Today at 11:20:50 AM]


Hound puppies $300 by Machias
[Today at 09:11:25 AM]


.45-70 Loads and Twist Rate by huntingfool7
[Today at 09:02:28 AM]


Top recommended elk hunt gear items.... by hunter399
[Today at 08:25:58 AM]


Small plastic boats? by HntnFsh
[Today at 07:39:36 AM]


Anyone fish ocean out of Tokeland? by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 12:01:54 AM]


Wolves behind Oak Creek by acrocker
[Yesterday at 03:40:14 PM]


Holy Smokes what a shock!! by Call em in
[Yesterday at 01:39:36 PM]


Unable to get kids' hunter-ed certificates into WDFW system by tdog
[Yesterday at 01:36:22 PM]


Montana Big Game Combo Draw chances by Magnum_Willys
[Yesterday at 11:49:01 AM]


Idaho Fish and Game Commissioner charged with poaching multiple bull elk by MR5x5
[Yesterday at 07:51:53 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal