Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: bowbuild on November 30, 2013, 11:01:05 AMQuote from: Machias on November 29, 2013, 06:29:56 PMQuote from: Bob33 on November 29, 2013, 05:48:52 PMQuote from: Machias on November 29, 2013, 03:34:46 PMQuote from: ucwarden on November 29, 2013, 10:02:51 AMThanks. Before WDFW adds more officers (if they ever do) I would like to see them utilize the people they have now. A huge portion of WDFW officer's time is wasted on bs. We (they) spend far too much time on work which has nothing to do with catching poachers. That is one of my goals; to get WDFW back on track catching poachers, not working dope grows etc.AMEN!!!!!It's interesting to read some of the quotes in this thread where people complain about officers being suspicious of hunters. Until poachers start wearing signs around their necks declaring "I'm a Poacher", how are officers expected to identify the lawbreakers without some suspicion? The same way I did as a Police Officer for 20 years. Everyone I made contact with was not a criminal, imagine if I treated all of them that way. Body language, conversations with guys, not interrogations.....I see it in a lot of police officer today as well, the power has gone to their heads and they act more like everything out of their mouth is gospel and you and I are all dirtbags. Most of the good wardens make plenty of arrest without being jerks to everyone they make contact with.My "AMEN" was geared towards Wardens concentrating on game violations then DUI's, Domestics, traffic stops etc... They are more involved in backing up other officers and doing normal LEO duties then Wildlife violations. And with so few of them this really allows a lot of guys to get away with a lot of stuff. They need our help, but I would like to see them focus back on what they were all originally hired for. Protecting the states wildlife codes.This is my number 1 problem with law enforcement. LE must remember that we as citizens when contacted are on the defensive.....we are NOT sure if this is going to be a friendly encounter, or the officer is on a crusade to write tickets......I am ALWAYS Leary, even if I know for sure I am doing nothing wrong...... Let me tell you that law enforcement may apply the same laws, but how, and what they may write you for is officer to officer.....even worse prosecutor to prosecutor. AS A CITIZEN YOU ARE LITERALLY AT THE OFFICERS MERCY.....He can put you through hell with the swipe of his pen, and you have little if any recourse....except the expense of court, and your time. So, officers next time you see a guy/gal nervous......it may be he/she is more worried about what he can't do about his current situation, rather than him/her doing anything wrong! Ask Cenci if he would write you a ticket if you had a rifle/shotgun in the vehicle during archery....he told me to my face......yes. I think he is dead wrong! By the definition of hunt....being in a vehicle is not hunting....until you step out to encounter a animal/bird.(exception would be using a vehicle as a way to injure wildlife, or harass) Never seen anyone ticketed for stalking elk in a park with bino's, and under the definition of "hunt" it would CLEARLY fall under harassment of a animal?? Wouldn't it?? (out of vehicle actively prosuing them)Seems to me that LE should have a very clear message when they are enforcing the law, and should be the same officer to officer when asked a question on what's legal, and what's NOT!I realize officers are NOT lawyers, but they should be able to tell you what every officer would write you a ticket for........without it being a guessing game for the public. BowbuildI wouldn't more on this topic, the reg state:Archery Regulations1. Rules pertaining to all archery huntingseasons:a. It is unlawful for any person to carry orhave in his possession any firearm whilein the field archery hunting, during anarchery season specified for that area,except for modern handguns carried forpersonal protection. Modern handgunscannot be used to hunt big game ordispatch wounded big game during anarchery, big game hunting season.So if you're in the truck, are you "in the field"? I wouldn't think so Seems as soon as you step out of the truck you grab either the bow or the shotgun but NOT BOTH. This law became screwed up soon as the state lost it's authority on disallowing archery hunters carrying a pistol.
Quote from: Machias on November 29, 2013, 06:29:56 PMQuote from: Bob33 on November 29, 2013, 05:48:52 PMQuote from: Machias on November 29, 2013, 03:34:46 PMQuote from: ucwarden on November 29, 2013, 10:02:51 AMThanks. Before WDFW adds more officers (if they ever do) I would like to see them utilize the people they have now. A huge portion of WDFW officer's time is wasted on bs. We (they) spend far too much time on work which has nothing to do with catching poachers. That is one of my goals; to get WDFW back on track catching poachers, not working dope grows etc.AMEN!!!!!It's interesting to read some of the quotes in this thread where people complain about officers being suspicious of hunters. Until poachers start wearing signs around their necks declaring "I'm a Poacher", how are officers expected to identify the lawbreakers without some suspicion? The same way I did as a Police Officer for 20 years. Everyone I made contact with was not a criminal, imagine if I treated all of them that way. Body language, conversations with guys, not interrogations.....I see it in a lot of police officer today as well, the power has gone to their heads and they act more like everything out of their mouth is gospel and you and I are all dirtbags. Most of the good wardens make plenty of arrest without being jerks to everyone they make contact with.My "AMEN" was geared towards Wardens concentrating on game violations then DUI's, Domestics, traffic stops etc... They are more involved in backing up other officers and doing normal LEO duties then Wildlife violations. And with so few of them this really allows a lot of guys to get away with a lot of stuff. They need our help, but I would like to see them focus back on what they were all originally hired for. Protecting the states wildlife codes.This is my number 1 problem with law enforcement. LE must remember that we as citizens when contacted are on the defensive.....we are NOT sure if this is going to be a friendly encounter, or the officer is on a crusade to write tickets......I am ALWAYS Leary, even if I know for sure I am doing nothing wrong...... Let me tell you that law enforcement may apply the same laws, but how, and what they may write you for is officer to officer.....even worse prosecutor to prosecutor. AS A CITIZEN YOU ARE LITERALLY AT THE OFFICERS MERCY.....He can put you through hell with the swipe of his pen, and you have little if any recourse....except the expense of court, and your time. So, officers next time you see a guy/gal nervous......it may be he/she is more worried about what he can't do about his current situation, rather than him/her doing anything wrong! Ask Cenci if he would write you a ticket if you had a rifle/shotgun in the vehicle during archery....he told me to my face......yes. I think he is dead wrong! By the definition of hunt....being in a vehicle is not hunting....until you step out to encounter a animal/bird.(exception would be using a vehicle as a way to injure wildlife, or harass) Never seen anyone ticketed for stalking elk in a park with bino's, and under the definition of "hunt" it would CLEARLY fall under harassment of a animal?? Wouldn't it?? (out of vehicle actively prosuing them)Seems to me that LE should have a very clear message when they are enforcing the law, and should be the same officer to officer when asked a question on what's legal, and what's NOT!I realize officers are NOT lawyers, but they should be able to tell you what every officer would write you a ticket for........without it being a guessing game for the public. Bowbuild
Quote from: Bob33 on November 29, 2013, 05:48:52 PMQuote from: Machias on November 29, 2013, 03:34:46 PMQuote from: ucwarden on November 29, 2013, 10:02:51 AMThanks. Before WDFW adds more officers (if they ever do) I would like to see them utilize the people they have now. A huge portion of WDFW officer's time is wasted on bs. We (they) spend far too much time on work which has nothing to do with catching poachers. That is one of my goals; to get WDFW back on track catching poachers, not working dope grows etc.AMEN!!!!!It's interesting to read some of the quotes in this thread where people complain about officers being suspicious of hunters. Until poachers start wearing signs around their necks declaring "I'm a Poacher", how are officers expected to identify the lawbreakers without some suspicion? The same way I did as a Police Officer for 20 years. Everyone I made contact with was not a criminal, imagine if I treated all of them that way. Body language, conversations with guys, not interrogations.....I see it in a lot of police officer today as well, the power has gone to their heads and they act more like everything out of their mouth is gospel and you and I are all dirtbags. Most of the good wardens make plenty of arrest without being jerks to everyone they make contact with.My "AMEN" was geared towards Wardens concentrating on game violations then DUI's, Domestics, traffic stops etc... They are more involved in backing up other officers and doing normal LEO duties then Wildlife violations. And with so few of them this really allows a lot of guys to get away with a lot of stuff. They need our help, but I would like to see them focus back on what they were all originally hired for. Protecting the states wildlife codes.
Quote from: Machias on November 29, 2013, 03:34:46 PMQuote from: ucwarden on November 29, 2013, 10:02:51 AMThanks. Before WDFW adds more officers (if they ever do) I would like to see them utilize the people they have now. A huge portion of WDFW officer's time is wasted on bs. We (they) spend far too much time on work which has nothing to do with catching poachers. That is one of my goals; to get WDFW back on track catching poachers, not working dope grows etc.AMEN!!!!!It's interesting to read some of the quotes in this thread where people complain about officers being suspicious of hunters. Until poachers start wearing signs around their necks declaring "I'm a Poacher", how are officers expected to identify the lawbreakers without some suspicion?
Quote from: ucwarden on November 29, 2013, 10:02:51 AMThanks. Before WDFW adds more officers (if they ever do) I would like to see them utilize the people they have now. A huge portion of WDFW officer's time is wasted on bs. We (they) spend far too much time on work which has nothing to do with catching poachers. That is one of my goals; to get WDFW back on track catching poachers, not working dope grows etc.AMEN!!!!!
Thanks. Before WDFW adds more officers (if they ever do) I would like to see them utilize the people they have now. A huge portion of WDFW officer's time is wasted on bs. We (they) spend far too much time on work which has nothing to do with catching poachers. That is one of my goals; to get WDFW back on track catching poachers, not working dope grows etc.
So would an Wdfw enforcement officer write someone up for having a sidearm while now or muzzle loader hunting? I doubt it.
Quote from: jmscon on June 07, 2017, 08:19:56 PMSo would an Wdfw enforcement officer write someone up for having a sidearm while now or muzzle loader hunting? I doubt it.No, you are allowed a pistol for personal protection (assuming it is legal for you to have one in your possession).